Nice additions. I hope it's ok to float an idea here. What if there were an "outdoor recreation" community that included things like camping, hiking, backpacking, but also longboarding, inline skating, paddleboarding, parasailing, disc golf, and any other outdoor activities that don't really need a dedicated community? Just an idea.
Beehaw Support
Support and meta community for Beehaw. Ask your questions about the community, technical issues, and other such things here.
A brief FAQ for lurkers and new users can be found here.
Our September 2024 financial update is here.
For a refresher on our philosophy, see also What is Beehaw?, The spirit of the rules, and Beehaw is a Community
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
Nice to see Beehaw growing om in a controlled matter and not rushing forward! Still keeping our awesome!
I'm tentatively excited for the veg community here. The communities on other sites can be...a lot.
Maybe just making the name "vegetarian & plant-based" would make people happier? This way people could talk about plant-based cooking regardless of whether it's for dietary, ethical, environmental, religious, or medical reasons as opposed to the specific culture around veganism in particular. I think both vegans and plant-based non-vegans might appreciate it not having the name be inherently tied to veganism.
Regardless, thank you and...good luck! You'll need it, haha
I love photography! I like taking pictures of my dog. her name's pancake and she's a sweetheart. thank you for signing up to be a moderator and keep our communities safe from transphobic trolls.
All this elitism and drama over the vegan and vegetarian community reminded me why I hate vegans (yes, I'm a vegan who hates vegans. We exist)
I will never understand vegan elitism. The goal should be reducing harm as much as we can. Elitism does nothing to promote veganism as a philosophy and there will always be someone more strict and more ridiculous than you.
There are people who say eating mushrooms isn't vegan because fungi share similarities with animals. I kid you not.
Can I suggest naming the community simply plant-based?
That ways it not only includes the philosophies of veganism and vegetarianism, but also people that for religious reasons or health problems have to follow a dietary regime based solely or mostly on grains, plants, etc.
I'm against calling the group plant-based. Veganism is concerned with animal welfare and the well-being of the planet, while plant-based ignores all that and only focuses on diet. You say you hate vegans? That's fine, start another group but leave our group alone.
You say you hate vegans? That’s fine, start another group but leave our group alone.
I see you decided to ignore the fact that I AM VEGAN (which I even mention in my comment) and that I was clearly joking.
Animal welfare and the well-being of the planet are two reasons to be vegan. Some people care about both... scratch that, every decent human being cares about both including people who are not vegan. You can, for example, be a person that loves cats and doesn't want the amazon to be destroyed without being vegan.
Anyway, some people are vegan for those two reasons. Some are vegan for only one of them. And some are vegan for a combination of other reasons.
Such as "I will get sick if there's butter in this cake" or "meat is too expensive" or "I follow a religion that says not to kill animals" (which is not the same thing as "animal welfare"). Or maybe someone is a manager at a restaurant, and they're sick of one in ten customers asking "can you make this dairy free?" so they added a vegan label to everything on the menu that is vegan. Or maybe they just want "leather" gloves that can handle frequent exposure to water (vegan leather performs better in wet conditions).
I'm probably missing some. There are lots of reasons someone might want to discuss "vegan" topics.
AskBeehaw, let’s go!
Really happy for the new communities! Great stuff, keep Be(e)ing awesome!
Good work. I wonder if the anime community will be spun up before the Gundam finale on Sunday, hehe
Very polemic the decision to group veganism and vegetarian.
Why do you think a diet and a philosophy are the same thing? I do not understand this decision and the stubbornness of it. Why are you not open to discussion?
Please explain how this makes any sense. Why not then socialism and vegetarian? or conservatism and steaks?
Veganism is not a diet. I am not making this up and can be checked by literally any source on the internet.
With this decision, you are undermining what veganism is by reducing it to a simple diet that can be grouped with other non even similar diets.
You pride yourselves that this lemmy instance is respectful and inclusive. But you are disregarding vegans and refusing to even talk about it to improve things so you don't hurt people's feelings.
you have two options here, man. those options are:
- stop taking this absolutist position and learn to compromise;
- do not use our community or our site (or i suppose get forcibly removed from it eventually)
the community is going to be made, regardless of how you personally feel--at the end of the day we're not catering to an audience of one and for basically everybody else this is not a worthwhile distinction.
The absolutist position is yours. I am just stating that this is not a well thought choice and you are being stubborn about it.
You don't even care about the implications of mixing a philosophy with a diet. You don't care what veganism is and you certainly didn't do any research before creating this community.
You are imposing this on everyone without any previous consideration or conversation. The fact that I am the only one saying this doesn't mean that I am the only one thinking like this.
If this isn't being authoritarian, then what is it?
Also, was point 2 a threat? Not sure so just asking for the records.
It's very difficult to engage in a constructive dialogue with someone making a series of "you" statements telling the other person their opinion.
I hear that you are upset by this, and I can tell there are strong emotions behind your post, but I think it may be best to take a break from this thread as what has been posted is not constructive.
It was made clear in the OP that the admin team did not believe there is a critical mass of users to support a separate space just for veganism. That had been explained clearly. Others have pointed out that many vegans consider vegetarianism to be similar enough to veganism for them to be combined, so it should be apparent that compromise is acceptable to others.
Refusing to compromise or engage in meaningful, authentic discussion, trying to hear what others are saying, is not going to be a successful strategy. Here or anywhere, for that matter. It's absolutism.
Anyway, I don't have a horse in this race. I'm neither vegan nor vegetarian and won't be participating in that community, but I would suggest you take a break from this thread and start a new post in a few days when you are emotionally ready to listen to understand.
you have a heterodox perspective here. most people don't perceive vegans and vegetarians as different in some foundational way, and people who self describe as vegans aren't necessarily in alignment with your perspective. i certainly am not. whatever certainty you seem to have about the distinction between veganism and vegetarianism is not as obvious to other people as you seem to think.
if you truly are having trouble understanding why veganism and vegetarianism would be grouped together, you are likely in an information silo, because the links between the two are well described on wikipedia, and the philosophical underpinnings of the movements (because vegetarianism is not just a diet, its an ancient and significant cultural practice) are deeply interlinked.
genuinely would recommend assessing where it is you are getting your attitudes from. to those not invested in the minutia of differences between philosophical movements with similar goals, you arguing to divide along these lines comes off as dogmatic behavior.
Vegetarians can eat fish, eggs, milk, honey, etc. Vegetarians may enjoy leather clothes. Vegetarian can also enjoy activities like fishing or going to see caged animals in a zoo.
This is a small example but these activities are not vegan because it involves the exploitation and suffering of animals.
When the community is created, pictures containing food with dead animals can be perfectly uploaded under this 'Vegan and Vegetarian' category. Do you think vegans like to see animals that have been killed for their taste?
Vegetarians usually don’t eat fish, that’s a pescatarian. The distinction between vegans and vegetarians is that one believes in using animal products, and the other doesn’t. That’s a considerable philosophical position, can you feed an animal and take its milk, eggs, honey, etc? They also tend not to extend their philosophy into stuff, which is a weak position to take, but even vegans have trouble not using animal products (tbh it’s hard enough to buy things that don’t involve human exploitation let alone animal, impossible to go to the hospital as a vegan, etc). I don’t think it’s fair to call one a diet and the other a philosophy, but rather both exist on a spectrum of ethics and conservation. That orientation on the spectrum now has a community. Socialism certainly has its infighting, but we cooperate, and you should too.
i am aware of the distinctions you are describing. i am even sympathetic to your position. i'm telling you that the sort of lines you are drawing here are not ones that most people feel the need to draw, and that regardless of how right you believe yourself to be, your opinion that these communities aught not touch is both not common, and not universal to vegans. there are places for which the sort of exclusive moderation policies you describe would be welcome and even necessary. the formation of such a communi in the fediverse is inevitable. but that does require a certain critical mass of people who support such a community, and if that support doesn't exist, then it doesn't exist.
also, the likelihood that people in a community about veganism and vegetarianism will inevitably include pictures containing dead animals, is, i think, at least a little bit presumptive. the content moderation will be determined by the moderators in the community, which doesn't exist yet, so you don't know that for certain.
the content moderation of Beehaw seems to me not in service of granular, insular subcultures, but collections of common interests, and like it or not, vegans and vegetarians do have many common interests.
Honestly based on my own experiences in real life I'd say it's more likely for the vegans to make the vegetarians uncomfortable through discussing the realities behind the production of certain animal products - I've only met one vegan IRL who was actually offended by people eating animal products, but I've definitely had a few veggo friends get a bit sad after overhearing me yarn about the dairy industry with an ex-dairy-farmer mate of mine!
i definitely had the thought that a combined vegan and vegetarian community would maybe be a viable "radicalization pipeline". expose vegetarians to the pretty solid reasons that refraining from meat but not from dairy or eggs is not morally consistent, and maybe change some minds. that might be wishful thinking though.
I've observed a utopian vs eutopian difference, philosophically, between vegans and vegetarians respectively. I was vegan for a while, but it was my position that my goal was to reduce my impact, not to eliminate animal products entirely, instead aiming for building a world where livestock, pets, and game animals live enjoyable lives free of suffering. Given this, I found myself aligned much more with the vegetarians I encountered who had the same goals, and were often understanding of that a purely vegan lifestyle is in many ways less sustainable for the planet than one that allows for animal products, and that vegan products are often priced outside what many consumers can afford. The vegans I encountered, however, treated me as if I were literally Hermann Goering
You should probably stop taking any medications and vaccinations as well as not see any doctors because I'd wager that 90% of medical science has been gained by exploitation of animals.
Militant beliefs are no good for anyone and upon closer inspection, don't make much sense.
I actually volunteered to moderate that sub specifically for this reason. I'm hoping mods will be contacted before subs are created to discuss.
IMO 'Vegetarian and Plant Based' is probably a more fitting sub name/subject.
I don't think Beehaw is ready for an honest conversation about veganism.
No, they showed they are not ready.
Which is very strange given that they cater to multiple ideologies, sexual inclinations, races, etc. But no, "there will be no discussion about veganism and you will enjoy what we are imposing, period".
I'm shocked.
I might be missing something, but is it the case that we won't be able to discuss veganism? I'm vegan for ethical reasons so I do get where you're coming from with this, but I think there might be perspectives you're not seeing.
I became vegan something like six years ago and prior to that I was vegetarian for my entire life. I was vegetarian because I had a moral problem with killing things. I became vegan because I eventually ended up actually listening to vegans' arguments for why dairy etc. aren't hugely different morally speaking from meat. If you want to create more vegans - and thereby reduce suffering - vegetarians are probably some of the most receptive people to these points, assuming they don't get alienated.
Assuming I'm not missing something and it is the case that we'd be able to have friendly discussions with people about why we believe veganism is a better moral choice, I don't really see what's so wrong here.
Yeah I went through basically the same pipeline as you (except I went vegetarian at ~11yo then vegan about 6 years ago) and to me vegetarianism was far more akin to a philosophy than "just" a diet - I just had some cognitive dissonance / wilful ignorance that I used as an excuse to continue eating cheese and eggs!
There’s a real argument to be made that a combined group is better for vegans, because it exposes them to the thought process.
You could easily make the same arguments about nearly any community we have on this site and most especially about POC or LGBTQ, the difference is that these groups have chosen to be inclusive of similar identities rather than exclusionary.
I don't think it's strange.
Moderating online communities can be a lot of work. And Beehaw is really trying to maintain civili friendly discourse here.
Part of maintaining civility (without tons of moderating power) is limiting conversation topics where different members are passionately on different sides.
The philosophical implications of the word 'veganism' aren't always obvious to those from outside vegan spaces, which is why I suggested 'plant based' as an alternative phrasing.
i think that plant based is maybe a better descriptor as well. more of a big tent than a specific philosophy.
I think that the “plant-based” phrasing would be a lot less vulnerable to this kind of philosophical debate, and it better captures the overlap.
they cater to multiple ideologies, sexual inclinations, races, etc.
They don’t, though. [email protected] and [email protected] are single communities that each represent several different minority groups. Combined, the LGBTQ+ and POC communities are probably a larger percentage of the world (and Beehaw) than people who don’t eat meat.
I am a vegan, and I understand that veganism is a philosophy. However, the reality is that we’re a small group, and we have a lot in common with vegetarians. We are either going to get a combined community for people who don’t eat meat, or no community at all.
Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
Honestly, I joined beehaw knowing that the admins would run it like a benevolent dictatorship. It's their instance, their servers, their time and effort, and I respect that.
you will enjoy what we are imposing, period
Yep, if you want to make your own community your own way, there's plenty of other instances that offer that.
Veganism may be more than a diet, but it certainly involves a diet. This would be your place to discuss the dietary component.
Doubtless there are other communities that could house the philosophical component. If not, you could spin up a Lemmy instance just for Vegans.
The point is, most people are not vegans and not even all vegans share your view, so expecting them to cater your very specific perspective is less than realistic. Your ideological purity is not this website's priority. Nor should it be, assuming the goal is to create a vibrant community.
I'm vegan personally, but my vegetarian friends and family members approach it much more similarly to my veganism (i.e a philosophy) than a simple diet. You're also forgetting about the millions of people who are lactovegetarian for religious reasons - I'm pretty sure they'd say that it's more than just a diet!
I am happy to have a vegan space here, but I'm not about to exclude ANYONE because the community does not fully match my expectations. This is a social place to have fun and talk and have constructive discussion. The last thing I want is to put a gate up in a inclusive space. I'm vegan for the animals, but I love everyone here. I choose beehaw for the inclusive and safe space, not to expect it to change to vegan echo chambers similar to reddit.
Veganism is not a diet.
Neither is vegetarianism. Both are philosophies that involve plant-based diets.
if there will be a dota 2 community I'll help out with that. Dota 2 in lemmy right now is a weird one. There is a major going on and when i make post, some show up most don't. I messaged the mod but no response. Thise which show up takes up like 5 hours to show. So i dont know what is wrong there.
I personally would also love to have a community for "Uplifting news", since global news can be very depressing sometimes. Having some uplifting news is a nice change imo
I'd like this but I'd hate it if it became like a orphan-crushing machine scenario where it sounds nice that a child sold lemonade over the summer and saved money to pay for kids lunches, but like all kids should have basic nutrition guaranteed at school and options to allow less fortunate students to eat breakfast and/or take home meals. So like genuinely good news about good policy or positive news about anything that isn't tainted by the typical capitalist bullshit or ulterior motive or quasi-nationalism if you can understand what I'm trying to express.
There wasn't a place in the application to write extra notes, so I'll slap em here.
I'd be willing to moderate the anime community but I wouldn't want to be head mod, primarily because I don't want to be responsible for the community guidelines. I think it'd be very nice to have a community that actually moderates transphobic slur usage in the anime community, but this is a touchy subject in the anime community for some reason. I prefer to have someone else to defer to on these kinds of decisions though, because I feel like I can be pretty uptight about stuff.
spoiler
i mean the word "trap" to be clear. the origin of the term is an old 4chan meme with admiral ackbar saying "its a trap", referring to male characters who dress in fem clothes. It implies that the only goal of crossdressing is to "trap" men into dating other men. I hope I don't have to elaborate any more on why that's a bad thing or how specifically its transphobic (or, at best, toxic to cis/straight crossdressers).
Is there any possibility of creating communities for fans of individual games/game franchises? I suppose as of right now, the size of Beehaw means that Gaming works fairly well for all video game content but I feel like this is something that won't work forever, especially for games with very large fanbases such as Counter Strike (r/GlobalOffensive on Reddit) or World of Warcraft (r/wow and other related subs on Reddit).
This is an interesting topic to me. I really wonder if a dedicated Lemmy instance will appear just related to small gaming communities. I miss them too
I'll do it for $7.25/hr