this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
86 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22200 readers
3514 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aaaa@lemmy.world 61 points 9 months ago (3 children)

How is it that the general response to this debate is "Trump rambled nonsensically and told conflicting lies and wants to undermine democracy, but Biden was recovering from a cold, so he's unfit."

Like in what world are these issues comparable?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago (1 children)

but Biden was recovering from a cold, so he’s unfit.”

Literally haven't seen that excuse yet...

Has he been recovering from a cold the last decade?

[–] aaaa@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago (3 children)

The biggest thing people are complaining about was Biden was a little hoarse against Trump's booming nonsensical rambling.

I don't care if Biden was hoarse. At Trump's best, he made no sense, and at his worst, he was pushing terrible ideologies

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It seemed a lot worse than being a little hoarse. He was conflating issues, mid sentence. And getting confused regularly in addition to seeming really feeble and not being able to answer what is asked of him. Listen if this was the first i was seeing this from the president, then i might buy this is just him mid fever. But it’s not and is expected from a man at his age. Still voting for him, but i am thinking Kamala Harris is going to have to take over the presidency before long.

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The biggest thing people are complaining about was Biden was a little hoarse

Who is saying that?

It's not in the article you're commenting on, and I haven't seen a single complaint about his voice being "hoarse".

Can you link what you're talking about where the main complaint about Biden was he seemed hoarse?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He was recovering from a cold? Is this really the excuse Democrats are gonna go with?

[–] aaaa@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The point isn't the "excuse", it's the criticism over him not having full power behind his voice during the debate being irrelevant.

Which is incidentally the only real criticism I could see this morning, beyond people falsely claiming he was incoherent. Which he absolutely was not.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Oh right, his just going mid-sentence from abortion to illegal immigration is textbook coherency, amirite?

Like PSA said, "new strategy to pivot from your strongest to your weakest issue!"

Tell me you didn't watch the debate without telling me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TunaCowboy@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

...

...

...

...

We finally beat medicare!

[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 39 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

both candidates are the age of my grandfather who lives with me because he needs care

no way either candidate has escaped the ravages of time

Biden and Trump both are selfishly keeping a younger generation from stepping in

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 31 points 9 months ago

Yup. Fuck them.

I'm voting for Biden, but fuck them both all the same.

[–] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago

I hate this timeline.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.earth 26 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Such obvious bullshit.

He's leading the party just fine against Trump right now.

I'm saying this as someone that donated ~$1000 to Bernie.

I'm personally glad Biden is handling Ukraine & not Sanders.

You'd have to be astoundingly stupid to think that the DNC is going to change tack 5 months prior to the election.

EDIT: Oh look, there are 12 of them now.

[–] TheDannysaur@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Starting with a declaimer of being fairly far left...

Biden is not looking like he has a winning chance. He's barely leading in national polls, but those polls are misleading, as, because of the senate, democrats typically need to win by 2.5-3 points in order to have a shot at the electoral college. So he's behind there.

He's behind in several key states where he needs to win. If you count states where he's down 2 points or less, he BARELY has enough to win. Can't miss a single state.

The debate hurt Biden. This is not a logical contest, it's a popularity one, and Biden is not doing well. I think he's done some great policy things, but that's not how people vote. Democrats have to learn that it's not enough to be "right" if you're going to lose elections.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Above all, Joe Biden’s allies wanted him to demonstrate strength and energy on the debate stage to help put to rest questions about the 81-year-old Democrat’s physical and mental acuity.

But on the biggest stage in U.S. politics on Thursday night, Biden did not meet their modest expectations.

And by the end of the 90-minute showdown, the Democratic president’s allies — party strategists and rank-and-file voters alike — descended into all-out panic following a debate performance punctuated by repeated stumbles, uncomfortable pauses, and a quiet speaking style that was often difficult to understand. Publicly and privately, Democrats questioned whether the party could or should replace him as the party’s presidential nominee against the 78-year-old Republican former President Donald Trump this fall.

"I’m not the only one whose heart is breaking right now. There’s a lot of people who watched this tonight and felt terribly for Joe Biden,” former Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill said on MSNBC. “I don’t know if things can be done to fix this.”

What we can do is run a better candidate before it's too late.

The convention isn't for over a month, and the DNC has been very open about how they can just nominate anyone they want.

We're only stuck with Biden because Biden and the people he put in charge of the DNC would rather risk trump than Biden step aside.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Did we even watch the same debate? Trump is a rambling moron. Biden is old, that is a very real concern, but he wasn't incoherent even a little bit.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago (3 children)

What?

When asked about abortion, Biden started ranting about illegal immigrants murdering women...

And for an example used an instance where we don't know who the murderers are, but right wing media keeps claiming it was immigrants.

Like, this isn't just you and me bub.

Feel free to provide a source from literally any major news organization claiming Biden did well and was coherent.

You're currently commenting on one about the opposite, but I can find more if you want

[–] Today@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Trump didn't answer a single question with anything other than, "I'm rubber; you're glue." Biden was stumbly but he at least answered questions and you 90% knew what he was talking about.

[–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

To rephrase this, trump performed as expected, Biden performed worse than expected.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Exactly.

I don't know why people want to declare Biden did a great job just because Trump showed up and acted like trump.

[–] Today@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Obviously, neither candidate did a great job. I just don't see how anyone can declare Trump the winner. Everything is about what Biden did poorly. Are the right-wing forums sitting around this morning discussing what great ideas Trump put out last night?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I just don’t see how anyone can declare Trump the winner

trump supporters were always going to say it, but who cares what they think?

Everything is about what Biden did poorly.

Because when the only other option is trump, it really matters if Biden isn't capable.

Are the right-wing forums sitting around this morning discussing what great ideas Trump put out last night?

Again, who cares?

And why does it sound like you want Dem voters to be more like Republican voters and have zero standards besides the letter by someone's name?

You can't turn the Dem party into the Republican party. If that's what Dem voters wanted from a party. They'd be Republican voters.

It's easier to change the candidate than 60 million Dem voter's standards...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Biden was stumbly but he at least answered questions and you 90% knew what he was talking about.

He didn't answer every question, multiple times he just went off about something else.

If you feel like you understood him 90% of the time, then you're the exception. I'm sure every trump supporter is saying trump made sense most of the time too.

That's why I asked:

Feel free to provide a source from literally any major news organization claiming Biden did well and was coherent.

And you apparently couldn't find one...

Edit:

And I shouldn't have to repeat this in every comment...

But yes.

Trump is terrible.

But Biden might not be good enough to beat Trump, so why not run someone that is while we're still a month away from the convention and as the DNC loves to say: they can nominate anyone they want, primaries aren't real elections.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

When asked about abortion, Biden started ranting about illegal immigrants murdering women...

That is an outright lie. I'm not a fan of Biden for different reasons, but let's stick to the truth.

I actually watched the debate. Its clear you didnt. Biden was coherent, even trump was for the most part coherent, he just made stuff up constantly.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

During a response to a question about abortion, Biden mentioned, seemingly out of nowhere, a young woman who was recently murdered by an immigrant — an apparent reference to a 12-year-old Houston girl who was strangled to death, allegedly by two Venezuelan men who entered the country illegally.

The connection to abortion was unclear.

https://apnews.com/live/presidential-debate-2024-updates

This isn't the 1970s... We don't have to rely on our memories of what happened

If you don't believe the AP's live updates, if the full debate is uploaded to YouTube somewhere you can watch Biden say it.

[–] SquirtleHermit@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Calling it ranting is hyperbole, but but he did randomly start talking about immigrants murdering women when answering the question about abortion.

https://youtu.be/z8eMauO_T88?si=_MDIXV7B-Hi3IU_5

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Calling it ranting is hyperbole

For an average person? Sure.

Rant: to talk in a noisy, excited, or declamatory manner

For last night? It was one of Biden's most energetic responses...

For him, it was noisy, excited, and declamatory in manner.

In the context of Joe Biden, he was ranting about it.

Quick edit:

Your clip isn't the one I'm remembering from last night and that my link referenced. I'll try and find the other one, I didn't know he pulled the same pivot twice.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CaptainKickass@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You didn't watch the debate. You were on 4chan apparently. This is the same exact thing those chuds are saying over there.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

During a response to a question about abortion, Biden mentioned, seemingly out of nowhere, a young woman who was recently murdered by an immigrant — an apparent reference to a 12-year-old Houston girl who was strangled to death, allegedly by two Venezuelan men who entered the country illegally.

The connection to abortion was unclear.

https://apnews.com/live/presidential-debate-2024-updates

It literally happened...

You can go back and watch it happen.

I get that it's not what you want to have happened, but that doesn't change reality

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Can you imagine what it would look like if they chose someone like Jon Stewart instead? How a debate like that would have gone? A guy can dream...

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 20 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Jon Stewart is someone I would actually look forward to giving my vote.

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Would he have to leave the Daily Show though?

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

No but he would only agree to working one day a week as POTUS.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Just anyone with more charisma than a bowl of cold oatmeal.

If nothing matters except beating trump, why arent we coalescing around a candidate Dem voters want so that we'll get as much votes against trump as possible

[–] aubeynarf 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Which candidate do you suggest, givesomefucks?

[–] CaptainKickass@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

They have no ideas, they only know that they don't like something

People who only dislike things are so fucking boring

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The problem is that the DNC would never go for him or anyone like him, because he’s not a blatant neoliberal.

If they swap, it’ll be someone like Newsom.

[–] aubeynarf 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Voters choose the candidate in the primary, not “the DNC”.

[–] Krono@lemmy.today 7 points 9 months ago

This is false, the DNC has fought in court for the right to overrule the results of the primary. It was litigated in Wilding v. DNC Services Corporation.

Court Concedes DNC Had the Right to Rig Primaries Against Sanders

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aubeynarf 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Which candidate do you suggest, givesomefucks?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

We're only stuck with Biden because Biden and the people he put in charge of the DNC would rather risk trump than Biden step aside.

We're stuck with Biden precisely because the DNC doesn't want to risk Trump, and the incumbent advantage is significant.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

and the incumbent advantage is significant.

An incumbent advantage helps but isn't an automatic win.

Biden's poll numbers are abysmal for Dem voters. The incumbent advantage likely won't overcome his unpopularity.

And when the most common reason his supporters give us just "he's not trump" then literally any Dem candidate has that too.

[–] rickdg@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago (4 children)

These debates are only there for Biden to lose 🤷

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments