owenfromcanada

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 day ago (4 children)

We joke a lot because what is happening in the US is really scary.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Humanity has seen crashes like this before, and worse. There's a lot of philosophical arguments around natalism, but at the end of the day, there's an argument to be made for having kids--even in a rough time.

All we can do at this point is try to equip our kids for the worst, and give them our best while we can. Their lives will be harder than ours in some ways, but possibly better in others. For example, kids today have such better emotional intelligence at a younger age than anyone in my generation did. They're not perfect, but overall I'm super proud of how the newer generations are turning out. I hope to inspire my own kids by working for positive change, to eventually pass them the torch to do the same. And if I can find some value in that, I hope they can as well.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Ubuntu minus snaps plus a better DE? Mint.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The stock market.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

DEMOCRATS used HARSH REBUKE

It's not very effective...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Brilliant, no notes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Even more apparent is when you draw the parallel to birth defects, diseases, or literally any reason we affect our bodies.

Pretty much all bigots don't realize it. There are almost no Bond villains in real life--humans can't really exist in a state where they truly believe they're the "bad guy." Some people know they're wrong, but they see themselves as a victim, not a villain.

Not only do they not recognize their bigotry, they believe themselves to be the "good guys" in this situation, with opinions on other people ranging from condescending pity to complete disregard.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If you're genuinely curious, I can give you a glimpse into their rationality (though I strongly disagree with it).

Say, for just a brief moment, that you consider trans people to be mentally ill. Calling them by their preferred pronouns would be like giving a drink to an alcoholic--you'd be encouraging it, which would be to their detriment. And worse, you'd be liable to whatever diety might be displeased with your actions that caused someone else to continue in their sin.

Of course, that only works if you have a very poor understanding of both gender and theology. The real reason the bigots don't like trans people is because it challenges their worldview, which is uncomfortable. And instead of facing that head on, they'd rather try to justify their current view.

The Oatmeal wrote a great info comic on this.

[–] [email protected] 189 points 2 days ago (9 children)

No, every person on that chat (other than the editor from the Atlantic) should lose their clearance and be fired. They were all using an unapproved, off-record system for discussing matters of national security. They are all responsible.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

They're very reputable. Sometimes biased to one side, but most are to one direction or another, at least a bit. Works just fine though.

[–] [email protected] 150 points 2 days ago (1 children)
 
 

Considering the proliferation of AI-generated slop, as well as the lines between satire and reality being blurred, I wonder if future historians will have a harder time understanding what was really going on.

 

Also mildly interesting is the difference in the L/R waveforms. Taken from the end of a Danny Go song.

 

(Detroit, MI) Republicans have begun a crusade against the time-honored 1981 classic Raiders of the Lost Ark, citing a lack of respect for the first amendment and encouraging political violence.

Sites like imdb.com have seen a surge in new accounts as Conservative Americans across the nation are creating profiles in order to leave a one-star rating for the Spielberg classic Raiders of the Lost Ark. According to these reviews, the film contains gratuitous politically-motivated violence, and a complete disregard for the first amendment right granting freedom of speech. According to inside sources, viewers feel threatened by the persecution experienced by the characters in the film, decrying it as glorifying violence.

"I don't expect them to agree on everything," one reviewer writes, "but violence isn't warranted for differences in political alignments. Ultimately, [Jones] and his competition have more in common than they have different." Another critic writes that they "of course don't identify with the politics of these characters, but cannot condone the slander and persecution presented against them." Similarly, many reviews cite tolerance as a virtue sadly missing from the movie. Summarizing the position aptly, one review states, "if he would simply sit down and have a rational debate, rather than punching the Nazis, I'm certain Indiana could have resolved his differences without so much bloodshed."

Related, ratings for 1963's The Great Escape have seen a sharp improvement, with reviews praising the dedication and efficiency of the soldiers depicted in the film, even though three prisoners manage to escape.

1
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 

My therapist said I had impasta syndrome.

 

The recipe always says to reserve some pasta water. I either forget, or I just don't bother. The one or two times I've needed it, I just added regular water and it was fine.

 

I just moved, but haven't sold my old house yet. So I left my tools there for any work that needs to be done. My dad let me borrow his tools for the new place (and I'm very grateful for that), but they're not the same.

 
 

Can't even salvage the pot

 

I told her I ate all the candy. Maybe I'm doing it wrong?

view more: next ›