this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
556 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22705 readers
4266 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 74 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Canadian here wondering the same thing.

Biden may be old, but Trump is literally unintelligible half the time. I've had more focused conversations with 2 year old children.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Brando. It's what plants crave!

[–] not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Camacho was a good president. Cared about people. Even tried to help them.

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Most importantly, respected the opinion of someone smarter than himself.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He tried to kill that smart person when the changes made didn't result in immediate benefits.

[–] Sc00ter@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

Wait you wanna use water, like from the toilet?

[–] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 45 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Even for the non-right-wing-owned media companies, Trump represents something they desperately want: ratings, clicks, money.

Trump, narcissistic power-mad entertainer that he is, kept people glued to the news nonstop from 2016 to today. Oh sure he wants to jail journalist and execute reporters, but those are news workers. The owners of the news companies won't suffer, and Trump will make them tons of money. They can just hire interns to do the reporting.

When Biden isn't in the news its because the modern media doesn't run feel good stories about the president doing good things.

They want Trump, they want endless controversy and fear and anger driving millions to their phones to click on news stories and look at ads. And they do not care about the consequences and side effects.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 15 points 9 months ago

Corporate media shouldn't have the same protections as a "free press." They aren't doing the job that such protections were meant for.

If their only goal is profit at all costs, then they aren't important enough to protect anymore.

And in my opinion, opinion shows shouldn't be allowed on the same networks as actual news with actual journalists. Fucking scum like fox news and MSNBC abuse the shit out of that and put opinion shows up that ~~lie~~ speak as fact, hiding behind the opinion designation which allows them to be as dishonest as they please.

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

That's absolutely it. In my mind, regardless of stance, all of the main stream media wants trump to win. It's best for shareholders, and that's all corporations care about. (In fact it's illegal for them not to)

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 35 points 9 months ago

Why would corporate media criticize their preferred candidate?

[–] wagesj45@kbin.run 34 points 9 months ago (3 children)

no one

I swear to god half the country has been talking about it non-stop for almost a decade now. What do you mean no one is talking about?! We're talking about it! Just because we've started talking about a new thing doesn't mean we stopped talking about the old thing!

"NO ONE."

I SWEAR THIS IS GOING TO TURN ME INTO THE JOKER. It makes my brain itch for the whataboutism when we've been talking about it the whole time.

[–] Blackout@kbin.run 28 points 9 months ago

Since the revelation about Trump on the Epstein docs my news feed has been nothing but Biden's performance in the debate 2 WEEKS AGO! Not just 1 story, but story after story and it's everywhere. From Fox News to the new Republic. It should be the other way around. News media is firmly with the right even when they don't mean to be.

[–] Commiunism@lemmy.wtf 28 points 9 months ago

In an interview on Wednesday night with CNN host Kaitlan Collins, Sen. Chris Coons (D-Delaware), who is now in his third term, said he had a revealing conversation with an unnamed "European head of state." That leader appeared worried about the double standard the media was applying to Biden, while largely ignoring former President Donald Trump despite his increasingly unhinged tone during press conferences and public appearances.

The article isn't talking about regular people, but the media.

[–] slickgoat@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

You're right. The real question is why no-one cares?

[–] Beaver@lemmy.ca 29 points 9 months ago

Yeah it’s really strange how the old age criticisms is thrown at Joe Biden’s way

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago

Because it's the norm. That's what everyone expects of the Mango Mussolini.

Until recently, people thought that the right wing echo chamber was lying about the mental state of Biden (because lying about Biden is of course their bread and butter), but then it was on display for 90 minutes on one of the most anticipated live broadcasts of the year. OF COURSE people are going to talk about it!

This article is just one big whataboutism from a Biden apologist pretending that everything's fine.

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (4 children)

~~European leaders~~ Europeans

Actually we're wondering why Americans dont have better politicians to choose between, than the two old grumpy men

[–] voldage@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

I've heard that they have guns so they can protect their democracy.

???

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

Because the only parties in power are the ones that can maintain the good favor of the people with massive amounts of money to donate, and therefore the only candidates presented are the ones that serve wealthy Capitalists. Voting third party is intentionally designed to be extremely difficult to avoid changing this.

[–] Xanis@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

We do.

The people who legally make the choices for us never seem to want to present them.

For reasons.

Totally valid reasons.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

The pursuit of mediocre candidates competing in 49-51 splits where the donor dollar tips the scale has degraded our political system beyond recognition.

[–] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It is politically incorrect to imply that Israel wants Trump and Zionists run the media, but I think that pretty much wraps it up neatly. The CNN hosted debate was an abomination and when AIPAC campaign donations get spent on ad buys, the media are the ones who end up with that money. Incidentally they gave Trump mountains of free media, remember the empty podiums? Dark money is not just a national security issue it's an international security issue. France knows this.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Zionists run the media

The tail is wagging the dog here. Israel is a manifestation of the US military-industrial complex. The US gives Israel money for the purpose of buying American weapons, the profit of which is used by Raytheon and co to support more money for Israel.

They wouldn't be investing that money in buying positive media and supporting Israel if it wasn't profitable.

[–] blahsay@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I mean they do. Ever seen Saturday night live?

[–] realitista@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

It's more the news media they are referring to, I think.