this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
21 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

68348 readers
5980 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/38938821

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm probably a minority in this (although probably not so much here on Lemmy), but if anything, I'd want my TV to be less smart, and less personalised. I don't want Google to know what my favourite TV shows and movies are. I don't want "suggestions" on which streaming platforms I could also install (often before the content I would actually want to see). And I most definitely don't want my TV to be monitoring the rest of my "smart" home.

For the people who are part of this articles titular "we", I seriously wonder: why would you have been waiting for this?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

I think you're definitely in the majority on lemmy with this take but i agree.

I have a "smart tv" that has never even seen WiFi because i prefer having control over my hardware. My media pc is all i need. I even got a little remote for an air mouse and keyboard combo that works just fine for me.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

What an A+ ad, doesn't even show which restaurant LMAO

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Haha FUCK

I'd fuckin give up watching media at all if that was my only option

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Wrap the chicken in bread and then wrap it again!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

At least until they kill the product in 18 months

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well they're discontinuing the OG Chromecast and Chromecast w/ Google TV for this. So you're probably right.

https://www.theverge.com/2024/8/6/24214471/google-chromecast-line-discontinued

Never invest too heavily in Google anything.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Although, isn’t this just a rebranding and evolution of the Chromecast? Seems like the same experience and platform, but with Ethernet, thread / matter, more storage, faster compute, etc.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Yeah but $30 USD vs $100 USD targets completely different customers and use cases.

I was willing to spend $30 per TV. But not $100.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Agreed. Just saying I that it’s basically the same platform and experience. They’ve just decided to only sell beefier / more expensive versions of the product.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sure, the twelfth time‘s the charm.

If you bought an Apple TV in 2015 you will still get at least this years tvOS update, if not more. How many devices has google announced and buried since then?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

Not to mention the AppleTV is just...a good product. It's really inexpensive for being the best streaming device for the masses on the market. Updates aside, I don't think Google could even make a competitor that's on par.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

All of my TVs have never seen an internet connection. I know the Apple hate is strong, but I’ve been throwing ATVs behind them since they were first released. No ads, no BS. Just a very clean experience that has never changed. I couldn’t imagine thinking putting a Google device from the largest advertising company on the planet would be some kind of upgrade.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago

They want me to buy a streaming stick from an advertising company and tell me it is going to be the experience that I’ve been looking for? Yeah… no.

This will either be canceled or enshittified immediately.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The Nvidia Shield is already the rival for the Apple TV.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Yeah, it's not cheap, but if you were willing to pay (like you would with an Apple TV) and want Android, it's a pretty easy choice.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

"That CPU bump probably means this thing still falls short of the Nvidia Shield TV and Apple TV 4k" Which is just pathetic. I left my Shield for the apple TV. The processor performance is just better on ATV. It's so much more pleasant to have snappy response times in these devices. Slower than shield sounds awful to me. I also noticed better speed test times on my ethernet ATV than my shieldpro ethernet.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

Go away, Google.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

No thanks I’ll stick with my Apple TV

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

This product looks awful.

First, ever since they added ads to Google TV back in 2021 (even on the Nvidia Shield TV), it’s been a subpar experience. Well, it was for me, at least - maybe it’s improved, but I switched to Apple TV as a result and haven’t looked back.

Second, why would anyone get this over an Nvidia Shield TV or an Apple TV, other than ignorance or an incredibly strict budget? The Apple TV 4K is $130/$150 new and the Shield TV is $150 new. The Shield TV, which came out in 2017, is faster than this. The Apple TV 4K is 16x faster. And if you get either refurbished, get an older Apple TV,

For anyone on a strict budget, the $30-$50 Chromecasts make way more sense than this device. Yes, they’re ending production of those, but there are still competitors near that price point.

The only thing I can think of is that they’re banking on brand recognition or are hoping the segment of people without smart home hubs who are unaware of alternatives (like the $35 SmartThings Hub Dongle) and who aren’t in the Apple ecosystem is big enough.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I just got a chromecast, and suddenly they want to change the MO to a set top box?

the motherfucker is 2 years old. a product should last more than 2 years. anyone know any better options for streaming hardware? i loved my chromecast but if its clear that this company is just gonna throw it out in favor a “shiny new thing” then i won’t seek replacement.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

It's arguably getting long in the tooth, but I've had no complaints about my NVIDIA Shield Pro.