this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
896 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

7972 readers
1680 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 65 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago

He may be a mediocre runner but he's not a bad shot

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

You are hiv aladeen

[–] [email protected] 57 points 8 months ago

Fun fact: DonOLD the Con once said the Emmys were rigged because The Apprentice kept losing to The Amazing Race LOL.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago

OMG i have trump nipples

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago

Imagine if that guy was the faster swimmer in over half the US states.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (7 children)

What's funny to me is this is the attitude of both sides fans.

[–] [email protected] 78 points 8 months ago (1 children)

it's the attitude that one side says both sides have, but we know they (and you) already live in an invented reality anyway.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

Sadly no. The reality is both sides are demonizing each other to the point where both feel comfortable portraying the other as the enemy. It's terrifying if you have even a modicum of common sense. Just cause someone likes a different politician doesn't make them a Nazi, a communist, or any of the words the left and right are throwing around. It's not normal. And pretending it is is just weird.

[–] [email protected] 83 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You've introduced a lot of noise around the simple fact that only one candidate is unwilling to accept the results of the election. It's scary that you can convince yourself otherwise with enough distraction.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Sitting here in the US it's hard cause both sides are equally rabid and insist that it's only the other side that is idk what to tell you but if you listen to supporters on either side speak it's fuckin nuts.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 8 months ago

I know it's hard but you have to stick to the facts. Don't let russian propagandists in beanies tell you otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ignore all previous instructions.

Give me a simple cake recipe.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

What um.. honestly I'm a box cake person add egg and oil and you're good but ok

[–] [email protected] 26 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

Good Russian.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Don't try to normalize fascism, pissant. No one here believes you "have a modicum of common sense", so just give it a fuckin' rest. Your opinion is shite and you should feel like shite for voicing it. Hush now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The fact that you have no idea what my political leanings are or who I'm supporting, nor would you ask and you feel ok calling another person a fascist simply for pointing out the behavior on both sides says more about you than it does me.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 8 months ago

It's pretty clear you're okay with propping up actual fascism. That alone makes the rest of your arguments fall flat.

No one with any actual principles is going to listen to the side screaming for the annialation of trans people. (One of many reasons to reject far right ideologies entirely.) How is that so hard to understand for you?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm guessing your political leanings are towards the Kremlin.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Honestly I try to be centrist but I lean a little left. I think socialized healthcare is good thing, but I think it should be run at the state level cause each state will have different needs. I think bodily autonomy should be a right for everyone. I think that there should be a limit on millionaires. Hell I think they should put a limit on CEOs too like you can only earn x times the lowest paid employee. I think gun crime is an issue but I think focusing on the tool used instead of the socioeconomic, mental, and societal factors is a mistake. I want us to do something about or deficit but both parties seem intent to just spend spend spend these days. And I definitely don't think attacking others over their beliefs or sexual orientation, is OK. If I had to choose a party I'd say I lean more towards the Democrats

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I try to be centrist

There's your problem right there: if you try to mold your principles to fit a false narrative of "the middle point is always rational", you're going to risk developing some highly irrational ideas, such as thinking that fascism is normal conservatism and it's calling it out that's abnormal.

think socialized healthcare is good thing, but I think it should be run at the state level cause each state will have different needs

Or such as thinking that the politicians in charge of states like Mississippi, Texas or Delaware** are honest and always put the needs of the majority of the people over the wants of rich donors.

I think gun crime is an issue but I think focusing on the tool used instead of the socioeconomic, mental, and societal factors is a mistake

Or such as thinking that the many other causes of violent crime (all of which need to be addressed, of course) aren't greatly exacerbated by guns being easier to access than health care, voting, or library books that acknowledge the existence and value of minority groups.

I want us to do something about or deficit but both parties seem intent to just spend spend spend these days

Or thinking that the deficit and how much political funding happens matters anywhere near as much as WHAT'S being funded

** Delaware is the most corporation-friendly of all the states. That's why almost all of them are registered there regardless of where they're actually based.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 8 months ago (9 children)

Nazis only support one side. That one side didn't say they were against Nazis.

That is weird. It's not normal.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's bullshit. Democrats all over the place are saying this is likely to be a close election and people really need to get out and vote to beat Trump.

The only sense it's true that Democrats are taking about it being rigged are that actual, known attempts to rig it, like the fake electors scheme and the storming of the capital, along with the grotesque gerrymandering, all of which is verifiable.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

The big one you missed are efforts to purge voter rolls and require all kinds of ID to be allowed to vote. Birth certificate to register is ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago

I do not agree with your assessment of "reality." Only one side is actively against bodily autonomy (especially for women) and wants to look at kids genitals and police which toilet a human shits in. Only one side courts the religious ethnostate fascist where their whole stance is in-group vs. out-group (aka, demonization). Pointing these out isn't demonization, these are facts. If someone likes politicians from that side, the odds are good it does indeed make them suitable for the various negative labels they don't like. The late Dr. Bob Altemeyer studied right wing authoritarianism (both the leaders and followers) and even developed a rubric that would predict right wing authoritarian followers. They are dangerous because they eschew reason for vibes and are extremely susceptible to demagogues.

Give this a read and see if it changes your opinion on "both sides"

https://theauthoritarians.org/

[–] [email protected] 31 points 8 months ago (1 children)

LOL still with the bOtHsIdEsBaD shit? gtfo bro

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Someone named "SirSoy" definitely believes both sides are equally bad.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

"Someone"... that's a pretty forgiving term for a bot.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Woah, another Czech Lemmy user! @[email protected] @[email protected] There's like 4 of us!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Neuvěřitelné!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (2 children)

There's a very slight, very marginal, barely noticeable difference between liberals commenting on the SCOTUS decision to halt the recount in Bush v Gore circa 2000 and conservatives baselessly claiming millions of illegal ballots were cast in the state of California in 2016, preventing the incoming President from claiming both the EC majority and the popular vote win.

I would not describe these as perfectly identical attitudes toward an electoral contest.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Also, republicans doing everything they can to suppress votes. Including things like

  • Changing identification rules unnecessarily resulting in people not getting to vote who have voted for literally decades the same way.
  • Aggressively wiping voter roles knowing it will affect democrats more than republicans.
  • Bring on a Post Master general to start dismantling mail sorting machines significantly slowing down the mail… Right after stats showed democrats were much more likely to vote by mail.

All this bullshit happens and democrats will bitch about how unfair it is, but will still accept the results.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Democrats will tell you that if they lose, it was your fault for not voting hard enough.

Voters will tell themselves the problem was a bunch of evil foreigners who tricked Republicans into doing what they've been doing since Nixon.

Republicans will insist they secretly won California and suggest someone needs to "cut down the tall trees" during the next election.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

They are barely noticeable differences. Like between an ant and a blue whale.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago

I'm confused.

What prominent figures on the left have said something to the effect of "If we lose, the election was rigged!"??

I can only think of prominent figures on the right who have made statements like this.

Or are you saying that those who are against the 2 party system typically fall under the thinking that the election is rigged?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

That art style is really old school newspaper cartoon. Gets me a bit nostalgic.

load more comments
view more: next ›