this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
71 points (100.0% liked)

Apple

18616 readers
8 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So as you may know, i am a guy mostly focused on privacy. Basically, insead of google i use SearXNG. (Privacy focused search engine) However, when i went to change the default search engine in safari, there was no option to add a custom search engine.

This really pissed me off. So how come Apple allows changing default browsers in the EU, but not search engines?

all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I’m not saying it’s the right way, but I thought this had been possible for quite some time by using a safari extension like https://apps.apple.com/us/app/customize-search-engine/id6445840140

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

If you’re looking for a free way to do it. The “Hyperweb” extension lets you.

But this is an imperfect solution as it just redirects, and your search still gets sent to your safari default + it takes longer to load.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

IDK use Firefox mobile I guess?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Yeah, Firefox on iOS lets you add custom search engines

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

you could try Safari/Webkit based Orion, which also happens to be more privacy focused as well. https://kagi.com/orion/

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (5 children)

You are privacy focused and use apple? I think I have found your problem.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I'd have thought Google is more invasive than Apple? I say this as an Android user...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Android can be degoogled, e.g. GrapheneOS. If you're focused on privacy then that's the way to go.

Although Google is worse than Apple when it comes to privacy, Apple is still pretty bad.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

And you can't de-apple an iPhone, like you can de-google an Android.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Some people have to use their stuff for a variety of reasons, don't be a dick about it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

In an Apple community too, no less.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

User name almost checks out

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago

So what are the alternatives? Android and even more spying? Degoogled Android and having to log into the website for your bank every time you want to send someone money?

Apple's the devil, but when your alternatives are "Devil Plus" and "Lose access to half the stuff you even need your phone for", I'll stick with the Devil.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

What type of problem though? I don't see anything wrong with using an apple product while maintaining my privacy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Apple isn't any good for privacy. Just as Google, it's a single big company that gets full control over your device. There are many examples of them exploiting it, by hashing your launched apps on Mac to check for malware, for example. Their systems are also known for being a lot more locked down than the rest, meaning getting rid of telemetry is not an easy task. Big companies are not interested in your privacy, they are interested in profit. And the profit they can get by building your profile is a lot more valuable for them than you as a user. That being said, the guy is right, but he is out of line.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

@TwilightKiddy @prousername bro really said hashing is a privacy violation??

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I mean, they where hashing any lauched programs and sending the hashes unencryped to their servers to compare against their database. So, they literally knew every program you launched, when you did it, but also your ISP knew it and anyone smart enough to MITM your connection. Sounds like a privacy violation to me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

@TwilightKiddy I can see how you can get there, but the MITM would need to know the hashing algo, you can’t *really* just un-hash something, at least not reliably

But your original statement was that the hashing was the privacy violation, and that’s the part I took issue with, hashing is a generally accepted security measure, it is not inherently a privacy violation

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

I meant a pretty well-known case, not hashing in general. Thought that was obvious.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well idk if this counts, but when i started caring abt my privacy i filled my icloud storage with garbage so that it does not back up any pictures. (also i dont have a mac)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

It's not really about something specific. There are just a lot of examples of Apple doing weird shit with your data and only stopping when they got caught. Most people conserned with privacy just don't trust Apple in general.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There is nothing more privacy focused than iCloud private relay.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

The reason I use Safari! So good.

Feels private, I’ve only read their layman explanation of how it works.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Kagi offers a safari plugin which intercepts a search request and sends it to Kagi instead. Works great.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They didn't want to use Kagi though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It also means someone could make a generalized search redirect safari extension without needing to wait for Apple

Edit: just checked looks like something like it exists

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well they could. It’s part of the value proposition.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Sure, but why not just say that instead?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Safari is just way better integrated in the System and its not like Firefox on iOS is the real firefox. Its webkit with a Firefox skin.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Damn, was not aware of this

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

FF iOS still offers Mozilla sync and partial ad blocking but no extensions are available.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

What system integration do you want? I personally wish Apple didn't restrict the usage of certificates to safari but that's about it. But I only use iOS on my work phone. My personal phone is an Android.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

When Apple figures out a way to maximize its profit by extorting those search engines.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

What did Apple tell you when you asked? Did you think anyone here knows the answer?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

I use Arc Browser on iOS you can click search for me and it will peruse the top links to your search query and use an LLM to extract the information you want so you can avoid the cancer that is modern websites plagued with ads and burying the leed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

@[email protected] It is not ideal, but you can use privacy redirect, an extension to change the search engine

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Yeah this is unacceptable

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Only search engine who pay got into that list.