this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
351 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22749 readers
2902 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 102 points 6 months ago (2 children)

You know this is elder abuse, it’s sad to see.

He’s clearly going through some form of age related mental decline. He should really drop out, for the good of the country, just like Biden did when the republicans were so sincerely worried about his mental decline and called for him to drop out.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 6 months ago (1 children)

To paraphrase the 10th Doctor, don't you think he looks tired?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

He's trying to strike a chord

[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

He needs to lose though. 1, it'll be funny to see but more importantly 2, if he drops out they have a chance to put someone just as repugnant but way more savy and intelligent into the race.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)

A replacement won't have his cult following. But I agree, for his idiotic movement to die he needs to be on the ballot and he needs to lose.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You're right. His replacement could rally the enitre gop, not just the mouthbreathers.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Is there much of a distinction?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

MGT or Matt Gaetz?

Oh wait, you said intelligent... I'm at a loss.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 6 months ago

He had a concept of a debate

[–] [email protected] 43 points 6 months ago (2 children)

“Viktor Orbán is known for destroying Hungarian democracy using techniques Trump has tried to copy,” said David Driesen, a constitutional law professor at Syracuse University, who has written on the capture of democratic institutions by autocratic leaders. “It was surreal to hear Trump cite Orbán’s praise as validation of his own leadership.”

It wasn’t surreal. That’s . . It was not surreal.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't know why at this point, but my jaw dropped when he was verbally sucking off Orbán. I couldn't believe how much he was glazing that piece of shit, but then I remembered who's mouth it was coming out of. Donald sure loves that "iron fist" approach to "leadership"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Well Harris' burn before him citing the support of Orban was the most incendiary in the debate. I find it uncanny it's not shared more. She basically tells him he's the laying stock of foreign leaders and unable to lead because he's averse of 'fact'.

https://youtu.be/ecGjnR3aNvA?t=8m06s

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

It's surreal to idiots that have been living under a rock.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They’re going to want a do over on Fox News. Don’t take the bait.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 6 months ago (2 children)

He already said no to any future debate including on Fox News. He's got his tail between his legs, probably too afraid it will get eaten.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Moderator:

none of that is true.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Either that or they'll just pretend he won. The jagoffs who watch only care about him appearing to be dominant, and Fox will cut it up to make him look that way

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This time they know, there is no pretending.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I mean, they still pretend like Jan 6 was only a few people walking around like tourists. I take your point, but reality has little bearing on what they profess to believe.

Although, yes, this does make him look like a dumb joke which is absolutely what needs to be done to fascists. Even a little doubt can start the cracks in his base while they all point fingers about whose fault it is.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Oh, I hear ya dude. The emperor isn't naked until he is in jail. But more important than anything - it feels bad to loose like this. The whole point of pretending is that you get to feel "strong" and like you are "owning the libs" or whatever. Now, it's like, what's the point? They just want to lose again, and get made fun of.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well as long as they don't act shocked and surprised. He did brag about not doing any preparation, and it showed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

“Dismayed” is such a strange choice of wording. Like “slightly annoyed” or “disappointed” or “it’s regretful”.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago

.....but will vote for him anyway.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

"Embarrassing" "Convicted Felon"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

When it's a cult of personality, all you're following is the (repulsive) personality. There's no substance to agree or disagree with...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Guardian:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/sep/11/trump-harris-debate-republican-reaction
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

'First'. Who are they fooling? "Only".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He was certainly more prepared than his rallies.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No need to prep for his rallies since barely anyone shows up. And those that do, get bored and leave.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

I thought it was really funny how Trump was nodding along as Harris said this