this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
255 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22568 readers
3646 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 84 points 5 months ago (3 children)

What a class act. It’s too bad the door swung so far in the other direction after he left.

[–] hate2bme@lemmy.world 64 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I voted for him but hate how he talked shit about the Patriot act overstepping then extended it and took away even more of our rights.

[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 93 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Congress extended it. Obama simply didn’t veto it. Perhaps that makes him complicit but it sailed through the Senate in a 67-32 vote which is likely to never happen ever again and a veto would only get overridden by Congress, which makes a President appear weak.

[–] hate2bme@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No perhaps. He spoke against. Under his presidency the added rolling phone taps. That is just as bad as W. I guess he is a little better because he didn't lie about an attack on America to pass it.

[–] Darkaga@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What would you have liked him to do in order to stop it from passing?

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Obvious answer here is veto.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago (1 children)

67-32

A veto wouldn't have made a difference.

[–] Johnmannesca@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Yeah, that's just enough to be a super-majority

[–] darharrison@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

You literally cannot veto anything that passes with 67 of more Senate votes.

[–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Actually, you can, but they can send it right back overriding his veto.

It would be an empty gesture

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 5 months ago

Yes you can. They have an opportunity to override afterwards, but the veto both signals the President's opposition and gives members a chance to change their vote.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I wish a politician 'told us how it is' by relaying to us how it actually is. Like, the power structure and the way shit gets accomplished by government. We have no clue. People running for office have a jist of a clue. Those in power are burdened by the system. I wish we knew more about the system.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

the way shit gets accomplished by government

Well, largely, it doesn't. And the reason for that is because few people in the US government right now know how to operate a government.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

Many in the government in fact don't want the government to operate.

[–] Whopraysforthedevil@midwest.social 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Also, not a fan of him ordering the extra judicial killing of American citizens.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I'm fine with it, but only because those specific Americans were assholes and weren't in a place they could be taken for trial.

I wouldn't mind a trial in absentia, but I also understand time was a concern.

Before you say 'oh yeah, what about others in the future!?!?', everyone got that pissed over a few that pretty clearly deserved it, I'm not too worried about a potus drone striking random people at Walmart just yet.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The downvoters apparently are fans of that

It happens 🤷

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Weirdo blue maga people, blue no matter who people. They are worse than red maga in some ways.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I remember how Michael Moore disappeared as soon as Obama was elected. Obama increased drone strikes, bombed weddings schools and hospitals including a doctors without borders hospital, kept gitmo open, extended and expanded domestic surveillance. All the stuff Michael Moore was writing books and making movies about during the Bush admin were apparently no longer a problem now that a Democrat was doing them. Really changed my perspective.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Obama did some good things. But mainstream democrats are still right of center on the political spectrum and are still beholden to their corporate donors.

The downvotes are funny as it is people downvoting facts.

I wish Obama was as progressive as his speeches suggested he was, but alas. He was able to pass a healthcare plan, albeit a neoliberal republican healthcare plan.

Obama would probably be a decent Supreme Court justice, he has some good ideas and knows law I believe. But I don’t know if he would do the right thing and overturn citizens united

I would buy Obama a beer, Kamala and walz and Biden for sure. I don’t think I would want to be in the same room with him, Trump I mean

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I would have accepted a centrist if he had done anything at all to dial back bushs aggressive attacks on our civil liberties and the people of the Middle East. He didn't, in a lot of ways he ramped them up. Hope and change my ass. Fuck Obama.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago

I am weaning myself off of giving votes for neoliberals after Obama. Starting with the president vote, trying to do the same for state and local elections but it’s exponentially more difficult

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Politics is the art of the possible.

Except that what's possible is waaaaaaaay less than you think.

[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, the racists were pretty pissed about the whole... Having a black president thing.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

People are really sleeping on voting Harris just to make racists mad

Some people need a smaller goal they can relate to

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Make racists mald again, that's not a bad idea.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 22 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I voted for him both times, he’s a really good speaker. Unfortunately, he’s a neoliberal corporate democrat just like all the others.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Eh, just pushing for the ACA makes him generic liberal, not neo.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

ACA is the republican neoliberal healthcare plan yo

Or at least it was lol, once Obama got it passed and the republicans started literally speaking out against their own plan

A similar thing happened to Biden, where he embraced the republican immigration plan but then the republicans changed their mind and voted against their own plan lol

[–] Surp@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I miss sanity in politics.

Was shit perfect? Fuck no, but there was comfort in appearance of civilized debate. You could disagree with a politician, family member, or even stranger without calling their entire world view into question. I can remember when we agreed on the facts, and just disagreed on whose solution was best to fix the problem.

I'm too old for this shit.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Mediaite - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Mediaite:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.mediaite.com/tv/obama-responds-to-heckler-who-claims-trump-wears-diapers-i-almost-said-that/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support