this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
276 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6573 readers
501 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They say she is using ‘the climate movement to throw her support behind the Palestinians’. Well, good on her.

“Silence is complicity,” Thunberg added. “You cannot be neutral in a genocide.” She is right.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 71 points 6 months ago

Greta remains awesome

[–] [email protected] 44 points 6 months ago

Greta did the climate movement a massive favor. Their words would have sounded very hollow if they decoupled other important issues. It would signal we only care about humanitarian catastrophes when they affect us.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Her words are like Sophie Scholls, but I really wish a bit more consequential in the present time.

The machines working against her are just so vast.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (4 children)

When the state media of one of the biggest fossil fuel exporter in the world is cheering for you, you might want to reconsider what you are doing as a climate activist.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They can cheer for whomever they wish. What you do mean much more than what people think of you.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago

This article is mostly 'cheering' for Greta's stance on Palestine rather than climate. Besides, it's written by a Canadian journalist.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

LOL, that's like saying any positive article from PBS or CBC is bad given the US & Canada are even bigger oil producers

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

So what you want is that all a fossil fuel company needs to do to sabotage a climate movement is to endorse someone in it?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

If there was a word for "genius" but for being a good person instead of smart, she would be that.