this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
68 points (100.0% liked)

3DPrinting

17294 readers
80 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![]()

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago
[–] John@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 5 months ago

Must be horrible to get the print bed leveled.

[–] faebudo@infosec.pub 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Room-scale DnD dungeons anyone?

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 months ago

And it'll only take 3-4 months to print it!...oh, and you can't really use your home while it prints because of noise and VOCs.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

So many questions...

Does it use some high-distance sensor fusion, it only prints things smaller than those builtin rails, or it just assumes wheels never lose traction and fails on every print?

How is the adherence of a random household floor? Does it require some kind of wax or it fails on every print?

Again, how is the adherence of a random household floor? Can objects be removed after printing? Because if you expect models to be correct on the first try, you'll fail on every print.

I'm sure I can fix a "why?" somewhere among the questions, but the "how?" is so interesting it would only waste space.

[–] NessD@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Crank up that in-floor-heating! The printer's running!

[–] B1naryB0t@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] CaptainBlagbird@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's a step in a new direction, a proof of concept. Maybe in the future something similar could be useful for road work or on mars or idk. No innovation & development without experimenting. You have to start somewhere and with stuff that is available.

And even if nothing comes of it, I bet it was a fun project to work on.

[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It could lead to a room size print bed, as in i wonder what the largest object it can currently make is.

Would also be neat if it could scan objects in the room as well, a lot more print in place capabilities with an idea like that.

Seems novel, but I agree with you, seems like it could lead to further neat innovation. Though it is pretty wild they chose a vacuum bot lol.

[–] CaptainBlagbird@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Though it is pretty wild they chose a vacuum bot lol.

In engineering school we created a robot that does specific tasks for a contest. It was a lot of work, but that was the main goal. Using an existing device that already has a LIDAR (and probably SLAM) sounds like a very smart move to me, for a project where you want to focus on other problems that have no existing solution yet.

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This AI craze has gone too far. Please don't actually produce random AI generated product ideas.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Or hear me out, you print the object and then move it somewhere.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 2 points 5 months ago

Nah, sounds complicated.

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The worst ~~of both worlds, good luck getting a decent print on something moving and good luck vacuuming anything with a giant thing on top of it.~~ 3d printer ever. It would be lucky just to not to get caught on anything, never mind printing on uneven surfaces is just asking for a misprint.