A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/4286365
Also fuck greedy investor urbanism. Valencia spent an enormous amount of time and money to redirect a river prone to flooding outside of the city. And then promptly urbanized the risky flood plain with housing and commerce.
Fuck investors in general. The DPRK had it right, as did Mao. Off with their heads.
They killed people they felt threatened by, and that they couldnt use. Teachers, doctors, authors, scientists, philosophers, social critics, journalists, midwives, artists, performers. Those are the people that died at the hands of Mao and Kim, not the capitalists whose wealth they both needed. Mao was all about investment into collectivist systems, one of the biggest factors driving The Great Leap Forward was the need to quickly develop new sources of domestic investment. And the DPRK is just a corrupt Juche system, they love foreign investors (and holding them for ransom!). Just because a few people you don't like incidentally died in the purges too doesn't mean they had "the right idea", and it's sickening to see you spout that revisionist BS here.
Tankies gonna tankie
yeah we desperately need another uprising, "investors" will not guilliotine themselves.
Jesus fucking Christ. I get advocating for less car reliance but cheering the deaths of people just for owning cars is beyond fucked.
Its black humor, not cheering the deaths of people. It's pointing out that we've been warning the world for years that exactly this will happen, and now it has in a way that resembles a system correcting itself. There's no joy in hilighting this, just ironic tragedy and the laughter of the gallows.
The comment is likely gone now but there was someone cheering in the comments.
And had they replied to that comment they would have had a point.
"I will shed no tears for any car owner killed in this disaster. They got what they deserved. For everyone else, I wish I knew where to donate toward any relief funds.” -- [email protected]
Who are cheering the death? The post had no mention of dead people.
It absolutely does. Fucking look at it. You can't take the dead people out of this photo, you can't pretend they're not there.
I see no corpses in the photo. There is nothing to suggest those cars are occupied.
But the people might not own the cars, they're entirely separate
I don’t see any people in the pic other than the ones walking at the top of the frame.
Are there dead bodies there that I’m not seeing?
The comment was removed but it was there and it had a depressing number of up votes.
This one?
Wow, 2 opvotes vs 52 downvotes. Soo depressing.
The post was new at the time and there were no downvotes.
People can hate cars AND help humans in need, even car users.
Flooding wouldn't be so bad without global car dependency.
I'm sorry for all the losses the people have to endure, but after this is over, there needs to be a discussion how to prevent disaster like these or minimise their impact on human and general environment.
Flooding wouldn’t be so bad without global car dependency.
because of climate change or...?
Reduced inpacts of climate change but more importantly better urban design. Long, straight, impermeable roads guide water wherever it wants to go with little resistance or slow downs. Cities can be built to be more permeable to handle water better, they can also implement stomwater retention and detention ponds.
Many cities currently waste lots of space on asphalt for cars. We could build transit with permeable surfaces (such as grassy tram lines or cycle lanes designed from permeable materials). We could build less parking lots and save that space for stormwater ponds.
The financial, spatial and carbon economy of motorised private transport is inefficient, including its infrastructure. Opportunity costs of missing climate action due to economical reliance on private transport, spatial constraints of land use for traffic and inefficient housing (private transport induced sprawl) are just two examples for that.
Climate change fuels flooding frequency and severity, so fueling climate change with fossil fuelled private transport is irresponsible.
So brave to seize on a natural disaster and massive human tragedy. How proud of yourselves you must be.
“Natural” disaster.
This is like when republicans whine about how inappropriate it is to criticize loose gun regulations after a mass shooting.
No. This is exactly the time to bring it up.
There is no republican party in Spain. lol
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_Spai
Edit: lol, apparently facts hurt people’s feelings here
But they do still have analogies in spain, right? The flood didn't wash away a fundemental facet of human communication?
I’m aware. Just using a situation familiar to many Lemmy users as an analogy. I don’t live in Spain so perhaps there is a similar form of ignorance there but I would not know.
I guess fuck all the buildings and lives as well, right?
The destruction of automobiles during a disaster which was made far worse as a result of climate change is a very poignant juxtaposition.
So basically, a submission that places fuck cars users at the level of this guy. Makes sense, fits all my expectations for them.
The responses to this on the other post were the same, punitive and wrathful with no space left for critical thinking.
How many people shop online then consume media showing the impacts of climate change or reports of warehouse working conditions within the delivery window? How many "fuck cars" users also subscribe to gentle parenting content? How many were raised in Christian homes and currently hold negative views on religion generally?
what if carbomb?
