In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
I feel like this is probably pretty effective. I feel like it should be a thing.
E: see also https://beehaw.org/post/16953380 E2: https://19thnews.org/2024/11/4b-movement-south-korea-social-media-trump-presidency/
So, creating a massive headache for government ~15-20 years into the future?
Or what is the point?
Wouldn't this just create even more conservatives if they are the only ones having children? Seems counterintuitive.
it’s also a quite terf movement. It basically mirrors MGTOW. I don’t think people should follow them.
I'm fine with no sex if those Nazi men can't have any too!
i highly doubt women will just stop having sex. its as dumb as asking men to stop jerking off. just never gonna happen
The no marriage part is interesting, the rest carries more unintended collateral.
As a movement, removing the institutional component would affect the wider group, and their wallets.
Nobody should be forced into relationships and customs that don't suit them. It's up to them to decide if the downsides are excessive or a price worth paying.
Read Lysistrata and good luck to you.
When the system becomes too odious, non-participation is one way of dealing with it.
I read the cliffs notes. I'll look into it. Thanks!
Because political lesbianism has been so terribly effective at anything last time around? Short of breeding massive amounts of transphobia, of course.
