this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2025
269 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22232 readers
4730 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 49 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Honduras, like many poor Central American countries, relies heavily on income from citizens living abroad. About 20% of its income comes from Hondurans living in the US.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (4 children)

How much do they get paid for the military base?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Bald eagle noises while flying away

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

~~Bald eagle~~ Red Tailed Hawk noises while flying away

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sorry I am from across the pond, apologies for getting the bird wrong

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Bald eagle is the right bird, but the noise that's played on TV is not.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I hope they get paid for power and water. Those are neat commodities to provide to a military base; be a shame if someone were to switch them off.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not sure it would offset this

The move would present grave risks for the small country, which depends on the United States as its largest trading partner and a source of humanitarian aid.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

China will gladly step in to that role.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

Oh sweet summer child

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

One thing unmentioned, and I don't think this totally makes up for it but it's worth considering, is people stationed on the base will spend a lot of their pay in the local area. The areas around military bases can make a lot of money from military personnel, even if they aren't being paid directly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

How much is it worth to you to not be forced into personally housing military soldiers in your home ?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Good. Play hardball with the stupid orange fuck. If he wants to play transactional games, then it's only fair that other countries negotiate with him in the same manner.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's really necessary for everyone on the right. We've gotten away with so much for so long around the world that they literally act like we're the main characters and everyone else will just go along with whatever demented shit they decide to do. Without swift and tangible retaliation that sentiment would just get even more pronounced.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago

Huh, well, they might want to brace for a very sudden coup in that country if history is any indication...

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago

Xi Jinping is already buying sunscreen for his army...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

That is a crazy position to take. They will do whatever it takes to not accept their own citizens back.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

In 2023, Hondurans sent $8.97b back to their country from their jobs in the US. That same year, the country's GDP was $34.40b.
Doesn't seem very crazy to want to protect 26% of your country's income.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Wouldn't have to if the US wasn't a leech on their economy

Google banana republic

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I wonder how big of a part this stuff mentioned in the article is

The move would present grave risks for the small country, which depends on the United States as its largest trading partner and a source of humanitarian aid.

If it's anywhere near it or larger they'll be in a real pickle since Trump is absolutely going to use trade and aid for coercion

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Can americans accept all of their dumb ass soldiers back first?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

US takes back its soldiers and Honduras takes back its citizens. I guess it would be a fair exchange but one side is going to be way more fucked by that than the other.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh they will accept them back just don't expect them to continue serving colonizer force. There are other countries like China who would be more beneficial to them once US bases are out.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Does China accept a lot of immigrants? From the numbers, it either doesn't seem to accept a lot or don't have many takers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I was talking about bases.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It's pretty crazy to me that this outrage is over sending back illegal immigrants. You'd think every country would have all the right to send those back. But I guess the situation in the US has been allowed, for the sake of economic interests, to get so bad that even that is now an outrage.

Crazy world.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The outrage is over sending back illegal and legal migrants, they’re talking about reverting citizenship status for some, straight up tossing out legal like the Haitian migrants in Springfield… Also do you have any fucking idea how insane it is to expect a country to suddenly take back thousands of people that are no longer citizens there? The kids and shit they’ve had since they left?

Oh and not to mention that Trump and friends promised that this thing is going to be bloody… they’re eating the cats and dogs after all right?

But yeah why the outrage? Who cares about kids and families and human decency. They’re illegal!!! Throw em out with the garbage, right? Who cares about all the cheap ass jobs these people do? Who cares about the direct negative impact it has on farmers, construction companies and the like, just as we saw happen in Florida when they tried to institute the checking of papers each day at job sites to ensure proof of citizenship….

Who cares at all of the immediate negative impacts to the economy that won’t just magically go away when nobody quits their current jobs to fill in for the now missing migrants?

That’s what you want us to say right?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Most governments in Latin America, including Mexico’s, have worked to stay on a good footing with Mr. Trump, even as they have sought to emphasize the contributions their citizens make to the American economy, whatever their legal status.

Countries are upset over illegals immigrants being deported too

It's kinda wild that countries are expecting others to host their illegal immigrants. I guess the US's issue is the inaction for the longest time, now when it's coming suddenly it upsets a lot of countries.

Who cares about all the cheap ass jobs these people do?

Who cares at all of the immediate negative impacts to the economy

Corporations are exploiting even legal immigration to undercut unions and keep wages down, illegal immigration is much worse.

But line must go up, I guess.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Leaving aside that borders are fake and shouldn't exist without actual hostile intent... Sure bro, you're all about unions and worker empowerment. That's why you side with the Fox News crowd every time you can.

And, just so we're abundantly clear that you're talking about something you don't understand:

Trump has been threatening to expel natural born citizens and the American fascists you always pipe up in support of historically don't even check citizenship in the first place when they decide to start rounding up brown people.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I'm not even American though. We don't have Fox News lol. But we have plenty strong unions who are voicing the same concern.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If conservatives gave a shit about worker's wages they wouldn't be conservatives and they wouldn't fight against it every other step of the way.

If they want union support on the issue they can stop trying to kill unions first.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

You are confused. I wasn't talking about conservatives.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

I find it incredibly un-american to reject those searching for safety and to make a better life. Welcome them, shelter them, and grant them citizenship. That is what this country was founded for; to escape persecution, and to ensure every man their freedom in the pursuit of happiness.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A year before that poem was written the Chinese Exclusion Act went into effect. Nothing new under the sun.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You seem to be missing the point.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm just pointing out the contradiction between the sentiment and the reality.

Another grim contradiction would be the "ensure every man their freedom" part from your comment. The US had to have a civil war to make chattel slavery illegal.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

While there may be many injustices in our history and the modern age, that does not mean we have to accept them or stand idle while they happen.

The sentiment stands, and is a reality many will choose to die for.

Just as you said, a war was fought to defend the freedoms of every man.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Many will vote and enact the complete opposite, which is why I think thinking of them as shared American ideals doesn't convince me

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why are they immigrating? A lot of the reasons are the US's fault

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Hoping for a better life, I'd imagine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I fail to see how this would do anything but give the mouth foaming populist , and now imperialist apparentley MAGA crowd , an excuse to bomb the country.

They want an excuse to kill you.