this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
123 points (100.0% liked)

Games

37445 readers
1377 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 76 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"We didn't leak this."

Yeah no shit bub.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Why are companies so awkward and dumb and "corporate". Just lean into it and score some fan points.

"We know it can be fun to speculate and people are excited about whatever information they can get about the next Switch; but we've got a lot of amazing things we're working on and it will be worth the wait".

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That also implies that there is more to get excited about. It's entirely possible that the leaks have completely stolen the thunder of their big reveal.

I also suspect that when they say "not official", what they really mean is "not final". i.e. These are prototypes, and could change by the time it's officially announced. They could also be contractually limited from statements, in a "we can neither confirm nor deny" kind of way.

I do agree with your larger point that their press release left something to be desired.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

What big reveal? Lol.. the screen is a little bigger and the joycons attach differently. Not really much to get excited about, other than the improved performance.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The speculation is free buildup and helps create demand anticipation. Leaks and speculation like this are great advertising. It only becomes bad when the leaks and speculation created are better than what the actual product is, or a lot worse than the product is.

If the speculation was going around that it would be backwards compatible with all former Gameboy cartridges and include free downloads of any Nintendo games older than 5 years, Nintendo would quickly release the real specs/info.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Usbourne effect

[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Anyone else feel like Nintendo is missing the boat here? Every day that goes by, the switch 2 becomes less exciting compared to the competition. They needed to release it 6 months ago.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Nintendo has never really cared about their competitors.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Or their fans - consequently.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

And yet they thrive, kinda funny isn't it?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Tell that to the Gamecube and Wii U eras. Funny that those are also all-time peaks for game quality, Nintendo is better at making video games when they're struggling.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

The Wii arguably has better first party games than the GC. Mario Kart Wii, Mario Galaxy, DKC Returns, New Soup, Wario Ware...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Tell that to the Gamecube and Wii U eras

They still don't lose anything, not if they can port/upscale them on the way and sell them for today's prices, why have backwards compatibility am I right?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They thrive now, but they will never forget the Wii U

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Mate, with how much the Switch sold, I think they already did.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

All the games being ported from Wii U to Switch would beg to differ.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They made Wii U as obsolete as possible by releasing majority of the games on the switch

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Perhaps, but they did that by “not forgetting the Wii U.”

Furthermore, Nintendo will never forget the Wii U as it was a lesson for them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

An opportunity to re-sell the same games with minor updates (I am looking at you 35 Mario anniversary edition) to a higher user base for today's prices?

What am I missing here?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah but that's because they historically have been so different than the competition. But in this case they have had their lunch eaten by the steam deck, Rog ally, etc.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago

But in this case they have had their lunch eaten by the steam deck, Rog ally, etc.

I see tons of people still using the old Switch. I have so far seen none other than myself and my kid using a Steam Deck.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

The Switch is a lot smaller and pocketable than those you described and is far better as a party game machine. It's also much more widely available. I don't think it's so clear cut especially if people are getting it for their exclusives. Yea, you can emulate it but there's a bit of work to get the ROMs and BIOS that the average lay person isn't really comfortable with doing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

That's true, but they still usually aim to be the first "next gen" console on the market every generation. Admittedly it probably would really affect them if they didn't hit that but that's how they've always done it

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They wanted to release it 6 months ago, rumor has it. But they postponed it to shore up supply to meet launch demand, give extra development time to its key launch games, or to squeeze the last bit of juice out of the Switch 1 -- or some combination of those things.

The Switch 2 will do just fine, better even, compared to its next closest competition.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Bit odd to complain that a console we know nothing about isn't exciting enough. Maybe wait until they actually reveal the damn thing?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Given how they front-loaded the launch schedule and ended up wiping out some of their own game communities(the corpse of Arms say hi from under the former juggernaut that was the Splatoon 2 launch).

The silence on their front WRT games suggests that they might be ramping up for a similar blitz for a switch 2.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago

"Not official"

This just confirmed these are legit but because Nintendo didn't make the announcement it's "not official"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Genki: "we bought this switch 2 model off the black market"

Nintendo: "we did not provide the switch 2 to Genki"

Yes, we know. You're not telling us anything new.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

...but also, not false...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

No shit.

Every 5 years, chodes expect each new Nintendo console to be a copy + paste of the previous one.

It's never happened.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)
  • SNES
  • Every handheld console except for the DS and Switch was a copypaste + upgrade from the last one. GB Pocket, GB Color, GB Advance, GBA SP, GBA Micro, DS Lite, 3DS, 2DS, New 3DS, 3DS XL
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"The new console unfortunately is not backwards-compatible." -> riots

...versus...

"The new console is backwards-compatible because it's an upgraded version of the old console." -> riots

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

You can be backwards compatible without just being a hardware revision. Look at the Wii, while it's definitely built on the GameCube, it has many more features

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Every handheld console except for the DS

I'm sorry but it is quite literally a GBA with an additional touchscreen and an ARM9 processor

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

You’re dismissing that way too easily. A dual screen handheld was pretty game changing and not to mention touchscreen was not a standard back then.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Fair enough, I have one and it is really ahead of the time

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (4 children)

SNES was top loading with receding flaps. NES was front loading with a flap cover.

Must I point out all of the changes, or can you do some critical thinking before you argue?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Japan never got a front-loader with bonus connection problems and extra empty space in the carts.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The Japanese version of the NES was a toploader, and the NES itself had a toploader version later on as well.

Also, what's with the personal attack?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Sorry, just frustrated to see the same assumption every generation, after ever generation sees massive change. In retrospect, it's probably new people making the same assumption, not the same people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Do you really consider that to be a meaningful point worth "um, akshually"ing over?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

This time it did.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Except no one expected the Wii U successor to be the same. The Nintendo switch leaks came years before the release, when it was still known under the codename "NX", and they were 100% accurate

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Not a fan of this response. Not because of the response itself, but because of the timing. Either they’re saying that because they’re about to announce Switch 2 very, very soon, or because they’re NOT about to announce it soon and needed to say _something _.

Here’s hoping it’s the former over the latter.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Interesting choice of words. Saying it's not 'official' just means they're not the ones who posted it.