this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
10 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2738 readers
1326 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

And how much will they now pay to NYP, Breitbart News, OANN, HuffPost instead?

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Calling it government funding is just a false narrative. It's a service government pays for. No different that someone subscribing to Ken's blog.

It's true that the simple fact governments own data is so unreliable that they have to pay private business for it is a problem. But cutting off access without any steps to fix it first will just lead to decisions being made without any data at all.

[–] Garibaldee@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

But cutting off access without any steps to fix it first will just lead to decisions being made without any data at all.

I can almost guarentee the next Dem administration will not take any steps to fix it either and will just start paying Politico again so kind of a wash for me. I think it's an accurate narrative, it is ridiculous that they were paying for this with tax dollars, even if they don't end up replacing it.