this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
30 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

31972 readers
2314 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/56437901

I have seen some people complaining about it, but I think its useful.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 15 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I think it’s a cool feature. Newest version of Lemmy allows admins to block communities from appearing in all while still allowing subscriptions. I think this is the best approach, although it would be nice if this could be done in a more automated fashion instead of admins having to expand the list as more rss feeds are added.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 weeks ago

Someone could make a script that does that every now and then.

Check for any communities made since the last run, and add those to the list

[–] m_f@discuss.online 14 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

If you don't like it, block the instance. That's the magic of the fediverse 🪄

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I like it, I have seen some people complaining that its spam.

[–] m_f@discuss.online 7 points 4 weeks ago

Yeah sorry, by "you" I really meant "one". If someone doesn't like it, they can block the instance

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 9 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

If it, or some other service, could find a way to publish feeds of content for sites which don't have RSS feeds, now that would be really useful.

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

That would require web scraping, which is easy enough to do on a news website, but it would require work for each individual site.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

Yes I know, I literally do it myself with a Python script right now for 3 sites. I just wish someone would generously provide a hosted and maintained service that does this. IMO it could be a game changer. For some people a single source that lacks a feed is a deal breaker for RSS.

[–] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 weeks ago

I think it's cool. If people don't like it? That's completely okay, you can block it

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

Having it all in one instance so people who don't like it are able to block it at the instance level is pretty awesome.

I like it.

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

I like it, it's nice to be able to bring RSS News feeds automatically into the Fediverse, and if people don't like it they can just ignore or block the communities.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 weeks ago

I wasn't really familiar with it before this post. Seems it is just an instance full of bots relaying RSS feeds to Lemmy? I think that can certainly be useful, but I also think the structure of Mastodon is more suitable for reading RSS feeds than that of Lemmy, so I think I'm going to keep reading RSS feeds through https://rss-parrot.net/ (and sometimes post things to appropriate Lemmy communities if I think more people should see them).

[–] will_a113@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 weeks ago

I like it for content discovery, but it feels weird to upvote bot posts. When I see something interesting enough to comment on I do try to see if there’s a similar article in a better community already or make cross-post.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I think bots that just repost stuff suck the life out of the platform. It's not organic sharing, you get EVERYTHING posted by the source website.

I'm actually really shocked at how accepted bots are here when it feels so antithetical to what the userbase generally stands for.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Why so? It's easy to block bots that have their accounts tagged as such. I block them myself, but I have no problem with them existing.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

I do block them but like I said, they feel like the complete opposite of what social media sites like this are....a social site.

It's all about the comments section and with a bot, there is no OP to talk to.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 2 points 4 weeks ago

The underlying problem is that Lemmy only offers Subscribed vs. All, and the former starts off entirely empty while the latter is... EVERYTHING.

PieFed solves this by a wizard that guides a new user to pick what their interests are and thereby subscribes them to many communities based on those. On top of that, Categories of Communities allow seeing any content that you choose - e.g. if 9/10ths of the time you want to avoid politics so you subscribe to none, but then that 1/10th you actually do want it... it's there for you. Instantly. And then goes away again just as quickly.

Some Lemmy apps do this as well - I don't know which ones - but base Lemmy does not.

So anyway, it's a UI/UX issue, but fundamentally a bot that at least is properly labeled as such is friendly enough, especially in comparison to all other media platforms where they masquerade as real people to pretend like there's more engagement than there actually is, and thereby boost advertising income.