On the surface capping vulturous financiers to better support teachers, etc sounds like a good thing? Someone explain why this isn’t a good thing.
this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
68 points (100.0% liked)
World News
851 readers
436 users here now
Rules:
- Be a decent person
- No spam
- Add the byline, or write a line or two in the body about the article.
Other communities of interest:
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
At least read the except, if you're not reading the article? The lady is earning 800 USD monthly, and just lost a quarter of it. If anybody's vulturous it's not her.
Do note that it's not as bad as $800 sounds like to a US citizen: Shanghai is probably the most expensive city in China, and the cost of living there is $613 according to numbeo.com. But that's a pre-mortgage figure, and obviously a Western site may not be well up-pt-date with current realities.
my understanding is that you need 1k income to live decent in non tier 1 city, and in tier 1 city, you will need 2k to make worth it vis a vis QoL.
decently? definitely. a decent salary needs to be quite a bit above the cost of living
this comment and comment above are not logically congruent
- You posit that her income loss is not too bad because bare min person can live on 613 so her going down to 600 is not that bad
- Well obviously if you want a normal life you gonna need that cash money.
My point was that it's bad, but not nearly as bad as someone earning $800 a month in the US. I did not articulate that well.
This isn’t stopping those at the top getting rich off the industry, it’s stopping single mothers from paying their mortgage.
On Chinese social media, there have also been complaints of pay cuts from people working for government-related employers in the construction, engineering, and media sectors.
But with no announcements from authorities about salary reductions in those industries, the scale of the impact remains unclear.
At the same time, China's government has increased the wages of public service workers.
I'm not sure what exactly "public service workers" entails, but since the article mentions them being the foundation of government management, I suspect it to mean only the bureaucrats (known in China as "civil servants" 公务员, which literally translates to "public servicing personnel") got a raise.
You are confusing a wage slave with the industry she works for.
That's like saying a janitor at bank is now part of the bank owner and operator class.
sounds like a good thing
it's a good thing.
I wonder what the people in China honestly think about their government. Can't get a straight answer on shou hong shu.
CCP DOGE