this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
33 points (100.0% liked)

worldnews

2104 readers
7 users here now

Welcome! This community is constantly upgrading and is a current work in progress. Please stay tuned.

/c/[email protected] strives for high-quality standards on the latest world events.

The basis of these standards comes from the MBFC, which uses an aggregate of methodologies, including the IFCN and World Freedom Indices, to rate the Bias and Factual Reporting of News.

These are non-profit organisations with full transparency of their funding and structure. Likewise, this community is also transparent – Please feel free to question its staff and the overall content of this community.


Does your post fit the standards? Check this thread!



Rules:


Disallowed submissions

Commenters will receive one public warning with only one strike if violating any of the following rules:

Thank you.

todo list:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A senior aide to President Vladimir Putin has rejected any temporary cease-fire with Ukraine just hours before a US delegation was expected to land in Russia for talks with Moscow where they will urge the Kremlin to agree to a 30-day cease-fire proposal or face sanctions.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are we surprised by the reaction? If your answer is yes...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

.....your retarded (finished the sentence for ya)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And you even spelled "you're" in a way they can read!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I'm doing my part

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The temporary cease-fire only benefits Ukraine. As was seen with the Minsk agreement, NATO was using the time to build up Ukraine's army. Russians learned their lesson and don't value any temporary or even permanent cease-fire without a political settlement, considering they are winning on the battlefield.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

The temporary cease-fire only benefits Ukraine. As was seen with the Minsk agreement, NATO was using the time to build up Ukraine's army.

No no, you clearly don't get it. Obviously it's Russia who needs a ceasefire, they are not advancing as fast as some time before, so it means that Ukraine is winning! And it's definitely not like Zelensky's regime needs time to resupply and kidnap more cannon fodder from the streets.

Russians learned their lesson and don't value any temporary or even permanent cease-fire without a political settlement, considering they are winning on the battlefield.

Russia is winning?? That's factually wrong, just look at the map! Ukraine has recaptured almost 20km2 in Donbass in the last few weeks! And don't tell me about the loss of almost 300km2 in Kursk in the same period of time, it's obviously just a regrouping and moving to better positions.