this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
185 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23520 readers
2136 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 76 points 2 months ago (2 children)

As posted in a different thread:

I don’t care if it’s cloture or the actual bill itself…

There should be zero Dems voting “yes” on any-fucking-thing these MAGAt bastards want.

Blatant and complete obstruction is the only way to play this hand for the foreseeable future.

Those Dems that do vote yes… 🖕 🖕 🖕 🖕 🖕

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Fetterman was a given, since he's been cozying up with the GOP as of late

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Well no, when MAGA wants something that’s actually good, there’s no reason to oppose it.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The Republican leadership just instructed the DOJ to put LGBTQ+ activist groups on a fuckin' watch-list like they're goddamn terrorists (and they're gonna fuckin' do it). The Trump Administration is doing everything possible to break the US Constitution when it comes to the freedom of expression, the freedom of and from religion, the Presidential Term Limit, and birthright citizenship which regardless how you personally feel about it is baked into the US Constitution.

So why don't you tell me what they're doing that you find so goddamn appealing. Because I just don't get it. Maybe I'm too fucking stupid, but I just don't see it.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (13 children)

And just when do you truly think any MAGAt will propose something "good"....???

Don't be daft.

🙄

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago

controlled opposition within controlled opposition. Aka rotating villains.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Anything I would have to say would get me permanently banned from the site for advocating violence.

Remember, as Napoleon Bonaparte said to Wellesley, Duke of Wellington, "Violence never solved anything."

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don’t think it’s time for violence. It’s time for new leadership.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Of course it's not time for violence; violence have never solved anything. Asking nicely and remembering to say 'please' and 'thank you' will surely convince them to step down.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

Don't forget to say "pwease" and "tank you"! At this point, I'm shocked but not surprised that the Democrats are just rolling over.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You dropped this: “/s”

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

Oh, no, I would never be sarcastic about that. Being sarcastic would mean that I was condoning violence directed at democratically elected officials that are surely doing what the people want and expect them to do, and are fulfilling their duty to the country and constitution.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Traitors. Remember their names and primary them as soon as possible!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There have been some discussions this week about AOC running for Senate to take Schumer’s seat, however 2028 is a long time away.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We won’t make it to then.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Maybe there will be enough support to replace Schumer as the Democratic Senate leader?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Hopefully. But the damage is still done.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

The shutdown will still happen...

This does away with the habitual earmarking of funds, and instead just puts things in a handful of piles.

So they can just not fund parts of the government that they don't like, and give everything to shit like ICE. CBP, or fucking Teslas.

They didn't avert a shutdown so much as freely give away what power they had.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Democratic Sens. Richard Durbin (Ill.), Catherine Cortez Masto (Nev.), John Fetterman (D-Pa.), Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), Maggie Hassan (N.H.), Gary Peters (Mich.), Jeanne Shaheen (N.H.) and Brian Schatz (Hawaii) (Nev.) all voted "yes" in addition to Schumer, — as did Maine's Angus King, an Independent who caucuses with Democrats.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Man I’m sure glad I called Fetterman.

That wasn’t a waste of my goddamn time nosirree

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately the only thing getting through to Fetterman at this point is more brain damage. What a waste of potential.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Big ~~GOP~~ corporate sex worker win.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

That's an insult to sex workers.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Did they even ask for anything? Not that they would have gotten it, I just bet they didn't even ask for anything

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

No, they didn’t.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

“Who else are you gonna vote for” - ten democrats, probably

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Some of them are not up for reelection for many years. They might be banking on most people forgetting about this, and they may be right.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They are right. Americans are idiots and we deserve every bit of suffering we’ll get.

Fuck this country.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Let’s not get discouraged and push for the Democratic senators to elect a new leader.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Schumer did manage to get GOP leadership to agree to hold a vote to ensure that the D.C.'s budget did not suffer a $1 billion cut. The House's bill was written to include the budget reduction, sparking concern.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Chuck Schumer is the biggest coward on either side of the Mississippi

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›