this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
153 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22612 readers
4594 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump's administration is escalating confrontations with federal judges, most recently by ignoring a judge's order to halt Venezuelan deportations.

The White House claims Judge Boasberg lacked authority, with border czar Tom Homan stating, "I don't care what the judges think."

This is part of a pattern where the administration has defied court orders on funding freezes and immigration policies.

Trump allies have called for impeaching judges who rule against him. Legal experts warn this threatens constitutional checks and balances, with one professor stating: "If the executive can defy court orders whenever they feel like it, they are essentially not constrained by the Constitution."

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The constitution doesn’t really matter when it is not enforced.

See Yeltsin (Russia’s Trump) making the Parliament more transparent by shelling holes into it or Zelenskyy for more details.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Exactly. The problem is he ignores the court orders and literally nothing happens. They're completely toothless. I'm not seeing a way this ends that doesn't trigger a constitutional crisis one way or another. Either Federal Marshals trigger a showdown by chucking officials into jail for violating orders, Trump triggers a showdown by having somebody arrest the judges, or judges keep issuing increasingly pointless rulings proving that the checks and balances were never real.

In a sane timeline the moment Trump violated the first court order he would have been impeached and summarily convicted. With the Republicans in control though they're not going to act either at all or until it's far far too late and Trump has successfully transitioned fully into the dictator he dreams of being.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

In a sane timeline, people would realize the coup has already happened. The US already has a dictator. This is the night of long knives portion of the slow moving coup.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago

Checks and balances when? What happens when 2 branches are neutered?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago

Start ordering contempt of court and put the low-level enforcers behind bars.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago

Caesar only got popularised as a tyrant after his death. Trumpy-boy is getting ahead of himself.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Its more of a shakedown than a showdown. Trump commands the branch of government that has the overwhelmingly majority of armed personelle as well as a cult behind him. What do the judges have?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

It would be up to the DoJ to enforce the court's orders. The DoJ that's run by Trump...