this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
336 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22705 readers
4078 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Courtesy (mostly) XCancel dot com:

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 55 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Where are the Democrats standing up for him?

[–] WarmRegards@sh.itjust.works 38 points 2 weeks ago

Taking that AIPAC money.

[–] parody@lemmings.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 weeks ago

I'm glad to see people taking a stand against it but damn, that's not many

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 15 points 2 weeks ago

The paddle factory is already operating at full capacity

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Where are the far leftists standing up for him?

[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We got nobody in positions of power

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

There is a reason for that. And it’s because the only people you can prop up are Russian shills, untested nobodies with zero evidence the have any knowledge of politics, and clueless blowhards that just yell at everyone.

Find a viable, believable, and provenly effective candidate and maybe people will vote for them.

Because remember- it’s not OUR job to just blinder vote for a candidate. It’s the party’s job to provide one worth voting for, right?

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

Haven’t read that before much. Are you able to “steel man*“ (opposite strawman) the opposite view?

*or w/e one would say

Oh also who has Russian ties on the far left? Not Bernie although I guess he’s not far is he? (In this definition, obviously by USA standards though.)

[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We had Bernie 🤷🏻‍♀️

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

No, you didn’t.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In the nationwide protests for his release

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Riiiight. I’m sure he’ll be released any day now because…. (checks notes) a bunch of people are shouting at buildings.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

So you shit on activists who are actually creating grassroots opposition. Wtf are you doing besides complaining online about the people fighting to keep our first amendment rights?

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

These activists are so dangerous that they're the targets of arbitrary detention, it's clear that it works

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I’m doing the same thing as you. I’m raising awareness, only I’m using a bad-faith misinformative statement as a platform for it to be seen.

See some of you like to shit on democrats regardless of what they do. Even when they are trying to help

I only call attention to this fact. Nothing more. And the results of the effort should be two-fold:

• One- the credibility of people’s false-accusations are destroyed, and
• Two- their misinformation is outed as such and the actual news is provided.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You are not, I don't consider social media posts to be activism. I consider donations, organizing, and protests to be, which I do.

Your bad-faith misinformation is falsely conflating the Democratic Party as an institution with the few progressive Democrats within, The Squad, that are the ones fighting for the working class. I've repeatedly given credit to progressives like AOC, Ilhan Omar, and Rashida Tlaib because they have genuine interest in fighting for human rights even if that goes against the party's position. The Democratic Party is failing to be a genuine opposition and fights back against the progressives within are are trying to change the party into a genuine opposition to Fascism.

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

lol…

AOC, Ilhan Omar, and Rashida Tlaib are democrats… but okay.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, did you miss the entire point? Those aren't the Democratic representatives being criticized

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Scroll up. I know the desire to White Knight a discussion can be very appealing, but don’t get blinded by your own armour in the process.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

We're completely obscured and whitewashed out of existence by capitalist/fash media. Conflated with liberals. Targeted for more violent attacks. Etc.

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yawn…. The finger points ever outward.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ahhh. So let’s see if we can’t get to an understanding here:

Stein, who is entirely irrelevant on a political stage- is saying it was “illegal” is an example of effective action and doing something about it, while:

Democrats in Congress that are demanding his release are doing nothing. This is why no one takes any of you seriously.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Wow 14 Democrats. Where were the rest?

Has the leader of the Democratic party Chuck Shumer called for Mahmouds release yet? The leader of the Green party has. Even Butch Ware her likely followup.

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

lol… so again, you share a link about ONE politically irrelevant clown supporting him, and that’s activism.

I share a link with 14 actual politicians- and it’s nothing.

Again… the next time you think to whine about how no one ever takes any of you seriously, remember how you conducted yourself here.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Sorry I did not hear whether Chuck Shumer asked for Mahmouds release. Can you repeat that?

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Sorry I couldn’t hear you over the roar of far left political figures doing so much more than everyone else- and by that I mean… Shill Stein’s saying:

“Awwww…. C’mon guys! Be cool!”

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Gaslight people by saying the left does nothing

Obstruct the release of Mahmoud Khalil

Project your party being bribed by foreign APIAC dollars on the Green party

GOP check complete!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CherryBullets@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

Go back to Reddit 💀

[–] alkbch@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

Some have been calling for him to be released.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 32 points 2 weeks ago

Well, that is because he is.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 2 weeks ago

Absolutely.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 weeks ago

Let's be clear, he IS a political prisoner

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 18 points 2 weeks ago

Accurate description, because that is exactly what he is.

[–] PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Was there an alternative word he should have used to describe himself?

[–] faceula@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

Who else is going to state the reality of the situation? Imperial media? yeah right lol.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Yup. Yeah he is. This is a disgrace.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago