this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
199 points (100.0% liked)

World News

44758 readers
6270 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TEL AVIV, Israel — The Israeli military says it has launched a new ground offensive in Gaza, sending troops back into areas they had retreated from during a nearly two-month ceasefire. This comes a day after Israel broke the ceasefire with a punishing series of airstrikes that killed more than 400 people, many of whom were children, and wounded hundreds more.

The IDF said it aims to expand what it calls the "security perimeter" separating Gaza and Israel, and to create a "partial buffer zone" between the north and south of the Gaza Strip. The IDF says it has "taken control and re-established" its presence in the Netzarim corridor, the large strip of land dividing Gaza's north and south that troops had occupied during the war and retreated from as part of a January ceasefire agreement.

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You did it, Americans! You saved Gaza!

And the power infrastructure in Ukraine??? Secure the safety of the minerals and the Nobel is surely yours for Dear Leader.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No one expected anything different from Trump. Biden was held accountable for refusing to listen to his base. If they ignore their base then they deserve to lose. Hopefully the days of voters allowing their politicians to do anything they want without consequence is over.

[–] finder585@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Hopefully the days of voters allowing their politicians to do anything they want without consequence is over.

lmao.

Yes, I'm sure Donald "You'll never have to Vote Again" Trump is working hard to make that a reality, good job.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Much the way Biden said nothing will fundamentally change? And he was right, nothing changed for the rich while we got fucked. Good job.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Biden refused to break the law. If you want legislation to change taxes it has to go through Congress. It was 50 Republicans 2 independents and 48 Democrats for the first half and then 51 Republicans, 2 independents and 47 democrats in the second half of his administration. To fundamentally change things you either can do so legally by having majority support or illegally by overthrowing the government. Impeachment also takes at least 50% of Congress to file the articles. If Biden actually did something illegal he would have been impeached, yet while Republicans voted 50/51 against anything that mattered, they never could get all 51 of them to agree with impeachment, because Republicans were the ones who had to have agreed on EVERY piece of legislation that passed during his administration or it wouldn't have passed. Saying he was currupt was always a publicity stunt.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Do you think the Leahy Law wasn't violated? The support for Israel's genocide is bipartisan, they wouldn't impeach either a Dem or a Rep for it

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yes support for Israel was bipartisan. With minority support of Congress to not support Israel.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, Nineteen Senators Voted to Block Weapons Shipments to Israel a minority of the Democratic Party. Most of them along with every Republican Senator did not want to block weapon shipments, in violation of the Leahy Law and of course International Law

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That was the Senate not Congress, but yes those are the numbers. The Senate holds terms 3x longer than Congress and thus do not represent their constituents as accurately. They are a not proportionatly representing the population which is why many believe they should be reformed. (1 member represent less than 600,000 people in one state, while another member represents ~19,000,000 people.). Their votes both count as 1.

So while the majority of Democrats now have an unfavorable view of Israel, where as in 2022 the majority had a favorable view, this takes much longer to get representation in the Senate. Are there representatives that vote against their constituents beliefs, sure. But when a change happens that fast it is very hard for a Representative based government to be able to move fluid enough to represent what the people want vs the payment checks coming from their campaign funders.

A dictatorship is not the answer, but we need voting systems that get accurate representation of the majority of the population much more efficiently. Unfortunately that would make us more of a democracy and the oligarchs don't want that. Because we would vote to better the majority and shrink the wage gaps. Which inevitably makes it harder for them to control the media when they don't have as much money to buy all of it. Making more voting go to help the people and not their pockets.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

There are plenty of policies that have majority support, even from Republican voters as well, that the Party has not implemented. On a weapons embargo, you're right that the switch happened relatively fast, due to the obvious reasons, but that doesn't excuse the Party from ignoring the issue. Especially during a critical election, when they are, at least in theory, supposed to be going after the most amount of votes they can. Representatives, both Senate and House, regularly hear from their constituents. They see the polls. It's their own decision to go against their constituents.

I'm all in favor of an improved democratic system that better represents the people, both locally and nationally. There are many many aspects of our 'democratic Republic' that is antidemocratic. But my main point is that the Parties have no genuine interest in what the people want. They are entirely beholden to the interests of corporate donors. And in that, I think we're in agreement.

The Democratic Party is no genuine opposition to the fascist threat of the Republican Party, precisely because of how much they gravitate towards the interests of corporate donors at the expense of the people.

Progressive policies that a majority of Americans support

Democrats' Working-Class Failures, Analysis Finds, Are 'Why Trump Beat Harris'

2024 Post-Election Report: A retrospective and longitudinal data analysis on why Trump beat Harris

How Trump and Harris Voters See America’s Role in the World

Majority of Americans support progressive policies such as higher minimum wage, free college

Democrats should run on the popular progressive ideas, but not the unpopular ones

Here Are 7 ‘Left Wing’ Ideas (Almost) All Americans Can Get Behind

Finding common ground: 109 national policy proposals with bipartisan support

Progressive Policies Are Popular Policies

Tim Walz's Progressive Policies Popular With Republicans in Swing States

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

We need grassroots opposition, organization, and resistance to fight back against American fascism

[–] gregs_gumption@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago (6 children)

No. Biden refused to listen to 10% of his base in the hopes of keeping the 90% happy. That 10% decided they'd "hold Biden accountable" by supporting Republican flavored genocide, because reasons. Congratulations, I'm sure Biden really learned his lesson.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 week ago

Never was there ever a poll with 90% of Democrats in support of Israel's war. Usually the strong majority of Democrats wanted it stopped. You're just writing fan fiction here so you can feel good about dismissing a genocide as a worthwhile political event.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago

Does the Democrat flavored genocide taste better?

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago

Well, if the 90% of his base is why he was supporting Israel, I'm sure they are happy with this result as well, so whatever the 10% did doesn't really change anything. You sound pretty chippy for getting to blame the 10% for everything the Democrats did wrong, so clearly you're part of that 90%.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 week ago

Never was there ever a poll with 90% of Democrats in support of Israel's war. Usually the strong majority of Democrats wanted it stopped. You're just writing fan fiction here so you can feel good about dismissing a genocide as a worthwhile political event.

[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Unfortunately a large block of the American voting base believes in fairy tales.

"But evangelicals’ support isn’t simply driven by a theology that compels them to love the Holy Land, detached from its convulsive domestic and global political implications. For many “Christians Zionists,” and particularly for popular evangelists with significant clout within the Republican Party, their support for Israel is rooted in its role in the supposed end times: Jesus’ return to Earth, a bloody final battle at Armageddon, and Jesus ruling the world from the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. In this scenario, war is not something to be avoided, but something inevitable, desired by God, and celebratory."

https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/truth-many-evangelical-christians-support-israel-rcna121481

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Let's discus a truce with ruzzia now! Trump is the best negotiator! I think if we (not Ukraine) just give all Ukrainian territory to Putin then he probably won't murder the Ukrainians that are still alive. Wonderful negotiations. Let's discus the stoppage of violins coming in from Gina into mejico too.

[–] krimson@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Alternative, AMD. Apparently I have been boycotting isr*el for a long time

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also recommended: The 'No Thanks' app to scan barcodes or look up company names with your phone and see if the brand is invested in Israel.

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Downloading an israel boycotting app sounds like the perfect way to get into a list.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Posting any slightly pro Palestine comment or following pro Palestine content creators will also put you on a list.

It is time to stop worrying about their lists. The movement has grown beyond the size where Zionists can stalk and blackmail singular individuals.

But for those worried about lists the website link is also a great option.

[–] Punchshark@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 week ago

Israel are the new nazis!

[–] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.funami.tech 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At least NPR are saying Israel broke the ceasefire. NYT managed to report on Israel attacking while not explicitly saying that Israel violated the ceasefire.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah but they're acting like they broke the ceasefire with this recent massacre when they've never complied at all.

Is that so? Did they continue offensives after the ceasefire was agreed to?

[–] deadkennedy@lemm.ee 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

sounds like the genocide is going well.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago

AIPAC money has always been bipartisan. Zionist garbage taking Zionist money are gonna do Zionist things.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Technically the ceasefire was still active because Hamas deemed it so out of good will, despite the massive amount of Israeli violations.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 5 points 1 week ago

~~Ceasefire~~ pause to make Trump look good