this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
19 points (100.0% liked)

World News

840 readers
526 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be a decent person
  2. No spam
  3. Add the byline, or write a line or two in the body about the article.

Other communities of interest:

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/19767918

Why do people living in democratic countries vote for political candidates who openly violate democratic standards? A new study by a University of Notre Dame [in France] found that diverse understandings of democracy among voters can lead to votes for authoritarian-leaning political leaders.

“A considerable variety in democratic views leads part of the electorate to overlook violations of democratic norms such as minority rights protection or restraints on executive power,” said Marc Jacob, assistant professor of democracy and global affairs at Notre Dame’s Keough School of Global Affairs. “These varied attitudes represent an important vulnerability for the democratic system as they can enable authoritarian political candidates to access and retain power.”

The study, [...] found that voters' differing conceptions of democracy shape their ability to recognize democratic violations and, in turn, affect their voting choices.

Jacob and co-authors Natasha Wunsch of the University of Fribourg, Switzerland, and Laurenz Derksen of ETH Zurich conducted a candidate choice experiment in Poland, a democracy where elections remain competitive despite some democratic backsliding over the past several years. (Democratic backsliding occurs when existing democracies slip backward toward autocracy and is currently taking place in every region of the world.)

The researchers found that respondents who supported democracy in principle but adhered less strongly to liberal democratic norms, such as minority rights protection and constraints on executive power, tolerated democratic violations more readily.

[...]

“Democracy education often features big, abstract ideas, but it’s just as important to show people how civil liberties, power-sharing, and the rule of law directly benefit them—and to remind them that their votes play a crucial role in keeping those values alive.”

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Conservatives don't mean things when they say words. They're only performing ingroup loyalty. It looks like civic engagement because that's what's popular lately. [Country] is good and [Country] is a democracy so democracy is good. The tribalist conclusion comes first. Things are good because we do them. They were not reasoned into these beliefs, and they're emotionally attached to maintaining them.

It's like a child with a favorite stuffed animal. They're not going to accept good-faith criticism of the stuffed animal. And if you tug at it and say immigrants are coming to take it away, they'll scream "No! I hate immigrants!" without performing any deep analysis of the situation.