this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
209 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9621 readers
964 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Big tough oil men turn into limpwristed traitors who knuckle under when Trump calls to them. Fucking embarrassing.

Nationalize the oil already. Get the foreign corporations and their brain dead lackeys out.

(page 2) 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I hope some of these demands are a starting point for serious adult discussions. It reads to me like Danielle wants to support Carney, but she'd be selling out to her base if she didn't press all these issues. She's tough, but she's also 100% Canadian. The best path for Canada will always be somewhere in the middle.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Smith hasn't been willing to have a 'serious adult conversation' in her life. She's a western separatist, anti-vaxx, transphobic conspiracy theorist. She makes Pierre Poilievre look mature and responsible.

And I'll say it again, just to be clear: She is a western separatist.

She is not 100% Canadian. She's a traitor to the country in every possible way.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I guess I gave her way too much credit. This thread has been enlighting. Thanks everyone!

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›