this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
343 points (100.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

32724 readers
991 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I look forward all of this scholars writing "Rule-of-Law" fanfiction where the protagonists and antagonists live and interact in a society with a system of mostly reasonable laws and law enforcement. Definitely now categorized as Speculative Fiction.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 29 minutes ago

Lol I see all those "honor codes" in movies and TV and I'm like... why doesn't the villian just ignore it? Like... just sneak attack against the protagonist, fuck the rules lol. If they are dead, there's no one to report you for breaking the rules anyways.

🤣

[–] [email protected] 47 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

They will be indispensable for documenting, for historians, what it was like when the United States still had law.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

We don’t need historians. We need people who are willing to risk their career to put up a fight. Documenting is just a word for being a bystander and let it happen.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 hours ago

You need both.

You need people to fight now, and people to document the shit out of this to cut through as much propaganda as possible for the future.

The current regime has already started to rewrite history, documenting the truth is putting up a fight!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago

If they also aren't "discarded."

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Ive been wondering what the difference is between an executive that ignores court orders and acts counter to congressional laws and martial law.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 24 minutes ago

Martial law would probably allow stricter control of the internet... so Americans like me probably wouldn't be able to use Lemmy.

(And I'd probably also end up getting summarily executed by the American Gestapo/SS, since... I'm not white... 😖)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

Martial law generally has legal mechanisms in place to provide some limitations to duration etc.

In other words, it would be an improvement over what is currently happening.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

Amount of police/national guard troops, maybe?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Something serious is being implied here.... Not sure what to make of it tho🤔

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 hours ago

That the concept of three branches of government keeping each other in check fails miserably when one branch has no way to constrain the other, or willingly abdicates their responsibility.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 12 hours ago

Those among them lacking in morals would make bank (or influence, whatever is afforded to them) justifying that government's actions according to US constitutional law.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago