Look, this shit takes a long time.
Cats have been being domesticated for about 10,000 years and most "cats" we think of as "cats" have been deeply influenced by that.
Just like dogs aren't actually all that closely related to wolves anymore due to domesticated evolutionary divergence, "housecats" are similarly diverged from their more natural counterparts. Humans have deeply influenced the breeding and thus evolution of both dogs and cats
Thus, humans have had significant impact on cat evolution for those 10,000 years.
Raccoons... have not been domesticated for any length of time and there are no raccoons whose physiology has changed over thousands of years to suit their co-evolutionary relationship with humans... because there isn't a co-evolutionary relationship with humans.
Animals humans have domesticated and/or used for farming are all deeply evolutionary diverged from their original species. Perhaps only chickens seem to retain some of the characteristics of theorized originating species, the red jungle fowl. Hell, it even goes for plants. Natural corn prior to human farming looked a lot more like wheat than the soft corn we eat regularly. We have done a lot of selective breeding with a lot of these species.
Each of these species have a deeply long-term co-evolutionary path that has been impacted by and often dictated by humans.
Raccoons, once again, have not. They have remained fully wild animals with nature alone dictating most of their evolutionary traits. This may begin to change in a few hundred to a few thousand years if humans and raccoons both stay alive and don't go extinct and humans continue to encroach on racoon natural habitats and raccoons move deeper into cities. However, we won't see such a change within our lifetimes. The timeframe for adaptation is just too small for significant change to occur.