this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
1003 points (100.0% liked)

memes

14499 readers
2992 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 129 points 1 month ago (7 children)

People are arguing about autopilot being disabled during the drive, but even if it was, the emergency braking system should tried to do something.

[–] [email protected] 200 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Autopilot literally switched ITSELF off less than half a second from the moment of impact. it didn't try to stop the car, it just shut itself off so it couldn't be blamed.

Imagine if someone whipped throwing knives at your back and then tried to argue "but your honor I was not holding any knives at the time of the stabbing"

Fuck Tesla, fuck Elon, fuck every simp who shits excuses out their mouths for him

(I mean, not YOU, you aren't doing any of those things; I'm just saying, those people. In general.)

[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 month ago

It's like a pilot bailing out of a plane and then claiming he was not responsible for the crash because he was in Vegas at the time the plane crashed.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

AP is supposed to disable itself if a fault or abnormality is detected. Pretty much all advanced cruise control systems do this.

I don’t think it’s fair to say the car was hiding evidence of AP being used unless it was intentionally logging the data in shady way. We’d need to see the logs of the car, and there are some roundabout ways for a consumer to pull those. That would probably be an interesting test for someone on YouTube to run.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

These systems disable right before a crash because the national traffic safety org in the US requires manufacturers to report if these systems were engaged during an accident.

It is not for safety or because of a malfunction, it's for marketing. Car companies dont want the features that they sell for 3-8k coming up all the time in crash statistics.

Tesla is the biggest offender here, likely due to vehicles sold, but also due to their camera only system and their aggressively false "full self driving" and "autopilot" marketing that far over promises.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

it's always been doing this. it's so that they claim AP wasn't active during the crash and evade liability

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 99 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Mark did an interview with Philip Defranco and posted raw footage showing/explaining that Autopilot turned itself off instead of hitting the brakes.

They also did two takes, it did the same thing both times. The first time, they just used a poster instead of a full foam wall. They decided to add the foam for a better visual once they realized it would just happily plow through it.

Finally there's some argument of Autopilot vs FSD; but both rely on the same cameras and should have at least tried to brake. The LIDAR car braked and it was just using emergency braking, no self driving at all.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It shows they didn't even watch the video. The only reason Mark used autopilot was because without it the car failed the simplest test.

The test was with a kid being in the middle of the street and Tesla didn't even stop in time.

https://youtu.be/IQJL3htsDyQ?t=9m38s

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago

It shows they didn't even watch the video.

Of course they didn't. Musk fanboys are an echo chamber of morons worshipping a Nazi oligarch. They're quick to react, and they dismiss evidence and facts if it doesn't suit their narrative.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

I watched some Tesla-sympathetic youtuber for balance and here are the key points brought up:

  1. He had a death grip on the wheel (because y'know, he knew he was going to crash). Exerting enough force over time on the steering wheel disables autopilot, because the system assumes you want to manually override what it's doing.

  2. FSD apparently is much more capable, but this Tesla only had the common AutoPilot turned on. Despite having FSD available (Mark apparently claimed he didn't know he could turn it on without adding a destination)

  3. Mark might have some sort of sponsorship deal with the LIDAR company featured in the video, which is why LIDAR was shown in a much better light (e.g it was shown stopping for a dummy behind the water spray, but in reality a LIDAR based system would just brake for the water spray itself)

Now all of those might be true, but you're also correct in that the emergency braking system should be operational even when AP is disabled. Unless the system malfunctioned (just having a dirty camera is enough). I know my Subaru throws out the adaptive cruise ALL the time. Stupid camera based system. You'd think it's better off because the cameras are at the top of the windshield, compared to most cars front grille mounted radars, but nah, it just keeps turning off.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

They are free to peer review the test and do it with all the stuff enabled.

That is how science works.

But I doubt they will, since this is an inherent problem with using camera vision only. Not with the software of the car. And they most likely know it.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 104 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I love that they had pre-cut the styrofoam wall in a cartoony hole shape because they knew it was going to happen.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 month ago

From following video with raw footage they initially used a poster, but seeing that Tesla would just plow through it they built the styrofoam wall for a better effect.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They also didn't need to put an actually wall behind the photo and destroy the Tesla, but why not?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Pretty sure that tesla is in fine condition. It's styrofoam, odds are the car didn't even get a scratch.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How would the photo stand up without some kind of wall?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Looks like they have some kind of lines under tension, possibly staked into the ground. Could be done without a wall. But a wall would make it easier.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 73 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

This is from Mark Robers YouTube Channel.

Credit where credit is due.

Mark Robers is fucking awesome, btw. He does all sorts of fun STEM things and keeps it interesting for kids and adults.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 month ago

I also like how this particular video pissed off Tesla AND Disney.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I guess credit is due, but with a basic understanding of the technology, I would be surprised if it did stop. Seems like a very set up and timed thing he's done just as a fuck you to Elon.

Which Elon deserves, he's a fucking flog. I just didn't think the video was that impressive.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

One of the tests from that video, the Tesla passed and I was honestly surprised it could. Can't remember if it was heavy fog or bright oncoming lights.

Either way, yeah, LIDAR is far more capable and beat the Tesla in every test. Incredibly foolish to go camera-only but hey, that's Elon.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It was the lights test.

In the fog test, it plowed through the mannequin kid (and in real life, they've been observed plowing through deer).

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Well the set up is "Some rich fucker was idiot enough to dictate his company should not install LIDAR, no matter how strictly superior it'd be to do so".

So I dunno. We could ask Melon Husk why he set that up, but I doubt he'll reply. All Mark Robers did is observe the effect of the setup of Edolf Muskler. You're right of course in so far that there's not much to the video then, and I faintly remember there was a case a lot of years ago where a Tesla drove into a sky-blue truck because coming up on a crest it expected to only see hill, which matched the color of said truck.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You know, with how distracted your average Tesla driver is, I'm pretty sure this would trick them even with them "driving" with AP on.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Pyrotechnics included.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

FSD was promised but never delivered because they need lidar for rain/snow/etc weather.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My old m3 has lidarr, but the fucker shut it off because he's an epic nazi fucker.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i was confused that you meant a BMW M3. I owned one for a few years. I guess less common than Model 3's

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah when I hear M3 I'm thinking BMW for sure.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

The FSD promise was mostly just market manipulation. Sure they might actually get it done at some point. But the time line they proposed was just a scam. And it worked seeing the market cap.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's weird, an optical sensor should fall for this, but LiDAR detects objects in 3D.

[–] [email protected] 78 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Teslas famously don't use lidar because Musk declared that cameras were good enough. Reality disagrees, but reality owns no shares of Tesla.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Musk declared that cameras were good enough

And then disabled existing lidar sensors in teslas, so his team could just focus on camera vision only

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yea, to my understanding Tesla does not use LiDAR and that's the issue. They just use cameras I think. Other people posted videos in this thread: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IQJL3htsDyQ

I can't be bothered to care/watch anything Tesla related, but apparently the lack of lidar is the thing being tested.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The first ten minutes is him "sneaking" in a small lidar unit to Disneyland be using it to make 3d models of the ride path. That's pretty fun.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

I used to bullseye womp rats in my T-16 back home, they’re not much bigger than 2 meters.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

And people are pissy about it. Tesla sucks. Grow up

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

AP aside, worst car manufacturer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I mean, I get the purpose of the test but I'm pretty sure a human would crash too.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 month ago

The other self-driving car didn't though

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Humans with two working eyes can tell the difference between a flat painted surface and a 3D world. Humans with only one eye might crash, though.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Not defending Tesla or anything but let's not pretend like the majority of people on the road looking at their phone would not have done the exact same thing

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Someone should make looking at your phone while driving illegal. Maybe even slap it with a catchy name like "distracted driving" and make the issue a whole big deal.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You're not wrong with the comparison, but the whole point of the computer having control over the vehicle is that this doesn't happen, despite the driver's abject negligence.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I see an opportunity to target Teslas exclusively

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›