this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
73 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

59774 readers
508 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Two senators have presented a bill to address what is now openly described as a crisis in French football. The draft envisions sweeping reform to tackle "structural" issues, including broadcasting rights and the ever-present threat from illegal streaming services. On the table, seven years in prison and a €750,000 fine for pirate IPTV suppliers operating as a group, three years and €300,000 for those not, and a new crime of inciting use of pirate IPTV services or software.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago

The bill starts off by saying football is organisationally incompetent and can't make money because it's too stupid to do it right, then blames piracy. Yeah right.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

a new crime of inciting use of pirate IPTV services or software.

This one is particularly nasty, because simply suggesting to someone that pirate IPTV exists can be used to incriminate people that haven't even done anything wrong. Regardless of your view on piracy, merely discussing something should never put you at risk of criminal charges.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago

One could argue that proposing this bill has incited me to try IPTV now, before it becomes more risky to do so.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Very bold move on behalf of the French government to restrict free speech. We know how that ended up last time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hopefully this time they won't use the Guillotine. Way too humane for the current rulers of France.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Depends how u use it. They often stacked multiple people up and the guy at the bottom would get half chopped and be just suffering their for ages.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Tearing them limb from limb with horses (or I guess these days they'd use cars) is more brutal though and could be made to go longer and be more painful. Crucifixion is also pretty horrible. There are way worse methods out there than the guillotine, even in your scenario of doing multiple people at a time. Methods designed to be slow and torturous by nature.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wasn’t it more of a good problem than a free speech problem though

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Kinda. The people wrote a list of demands before heads started rolling. Their speech was ignored and punished so they resorted to violence.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Sorry, I meant ”food problem”, but I guess your response is still an answer

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

We have ruined everything in the name of sportsball.