this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
55 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23520 readers
2310 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A pretty stunning indictment coming from David Brooks.

Brooks, if you don't know, has been a conservative commentator for... geeze... decades?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Brooks_(commentator)

I used to really enjoy watching him on the PBS Newshour when they would partner him with the late Mark Shields (now with Jonathan Capehart).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Shields

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Capehart

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago (3 children)

From Abraham Lincoln to Franklin D. Roosevelt to Ronald Reagan and beyond, Americans fought for freedom and human dignity and against tyranny; we promoted democracy, funded the Marshall Plan, and saved millions of people across Africa from HIV and AIDS. When we caused harm—Vietnam, Iraq—it was because of our overconfidence and naivete, not evil intentions.

Wow. This motherfucker thinks Reagan was actually good on the AIDS issue‽ No wonder he didn't "see this coming;" he's a genuine moron!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Reagan wasn't good on HIV-AIDS.
George H. W. Bush wasn't either.
But George W. Bush was.

PEPFAR was Baby Bush's baby.

I don't think the passage you quoted was intended to say that Reagan was good on HIV-AIDS, but rather that America ended up being good on HIV-AIDS.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Also, blaming Iraq on naivete? How actually naive do you have to be to believe that? Good lord...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yep, dude has a long history of being a creep. Not worth promoting him anywhere.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I saw this shit in my RSS feed and swiped it read.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There were two kinds of people in our movement back then, the conservatives and the reactionaries.

No Mr. Brooks, you were all reactionaries. Just because MAGA doesn't go around quoting Edmund Berk doesn't mean that they don't understand him, perhaps better than you. What did Burke advocate for if not for the French Revolutionaries to be brought low and for the kings to be restored?

You're heroes resent extending political power to the bourgeoisie, so please stop talking about what conservatives thinkers want to do for the "working people". Fuck off.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

If I recall correctly, Burke expected the French Revolution to eat itself and turn tyrannical ... which, y'know, it did. He was right about that.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

Where to even start? Is it good these people are coming out saying that Trump is bad? Yes. Are these people smart? Do these people care about anything or anyone other than their own limited interests? No. Nice of him to casually mention being against apartheid so we know he's not "one of the bad ones". But he is one of the bad ones, he just never thought it'd get THIS bad. He talks about being the party of incremental progress. Who does that actually help? If you think the direction you're moving in is good, wouldn't you want to get there as fast as possible? I'm not part of the "move fast and break things mindset", but how does a slow acceptance of trans rights help anyone but the bigots who feel like any delay is a win? We had to send in the national guard to accompany students attending integrated schools. Should we have done that slower too? Honestly, glad he's saying Trump is bad, but his inability to come to the conclusion that the problem is with conservatism itself makes me question whether he has ever had anything insightful to say about anything.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Eh, let's not get to impressed:

Owning the libs became a lucrative strategy.

Of course, the left made it easy for them. The left really did purge conservatives from universities and other cultural power centers. The left really did valorize a “meritocratic” caste system that privileged the children of the affluent and screwed the working class. The left really did pontificate to their unenlightened moral inferiors on everything from gender to the environment. The left really did create a stifling orthodoxy that stamped out dissent. If you tell half the country that their voices don’t matter, then the voiceless are going to flip over the table.

But he almost stumbled onto class warfare:

This political moment isn’t populists versus elitists; it is, as I’ve written before, like a civil war in a prep school where the sleazy rich kids are taking on the pretentious rich kids.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

The same argument the south used. "You can't have morals and be mad that we don't". The north did tell them their voices didn't matter and they did table flip like brats and started a war that the north didn't want. It sucks that some people have to be dragged kicking and screaming into morality, but the truth is that it's not against the working class. They just like to believe the working class are all racist bigots just like themselves. The left kept working families safe and fed with support for unions and osha.

To call educating "pontificating to their unenlightened moral inferiors" is such a self report. As though talking about climate change equated to beheading their family in front of them. These are people that don't like being wrong and don't care about being right, so anyone disagreeing with them is forcing them to be awful people, because what are they supposed to do? Change their mind? Learn something? It really feels like they can't even hear themselves sometimes.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

My wife points out he's also conveniently avoiding the racial element.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This dude has always been a total shitbag.

Excellent example of how liberalism supports fascism.

Fuck this clown.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

A stunning piece of analysis, all the more so coming from a conservative. A nice reminder that not every one on the conservative side is a ruthless moron.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago

He caused this. He cheered dick cheney and the extreme presidential powers theory. He cheered the conservative justices that broke the constitution. This is his fault.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

This guy starts out the article claiming that "Ronald Reagan... saved millions of people across Africa from HIV and AIDS." Are you sure he's not a moron, because he looks like one to me!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

even the sane rational republicans still vote republican, helping trump.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

This dude has been a ruthless moron for decades.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

My favorite quote from this:

"But conservative intellectuals didn’t take this seriously enough. In large part, I think this was because we looked down on the Dartmouth Review mafia, whose members had included Laura Ingraham and Dinesh D’Souza. Their intellectual standards were so obviously third-rate. I don’t know how to put this politely, but they just seemed creepy—nakedly ambitious in a way that I thought would destroy them in the end.

Instead, history has smiled on them. A prominent publisher of right-wing authors once told me that the way to sell conservative books is not to write a good book—it’s to write a book that will offend the left, thereby causing the reactionaries to rally to your side and buy it. That led to books with titles such as The Big Lie: Exposing the Nazi Roots of the American Left, and to Ann Coulter’s entire career. Owning the libs became a lucrative strategy."