this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
67 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2849 readers
1158 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

it would require documentary proof of citizenship, such as a passport or birth certificate, to register to vote. The bill passed the House Thursday morning 220-208.

Nine percent of American citizens, roughly 21 million people, don’t have ready access to citizenship documents, according to a study by the Brennan Center and other voting rights groups. Sixty percent of them voted in the 2020 election. Close to 4 million don’t have these documents at all, because they were lost, destroyed, or stolen.

They probably just want to be able to take people’s papers when they come to vote.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

No papers? Straight to El Salvador

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It just passed in the House.

Democrats petitioned for protections for people with a name change and Republicans voted against it. If your birth certificate name doesn’t match your ID, you’ll be needing new documentation if you want to vote. Yes, that includes a married surname.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Does it still have to pass the Senate though? Not that they’re any better, but it’s not a done deal yet, is it?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It does have to pass the Senate. I can't see this overcoming a filibuster.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Thank you. I’ll keep my fingers crossed and keep trying to make my voice heard.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

"Ah we'll just vote them out in 2-4 years and we can go back to brunch."

There are no guard rails this time. No guard rails! This problem won't just go away on its own, as this very bill demonstrates.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago

Respectfully, and I mean this with as much love as possible.

This is the stupidest fucking thing I've ever read.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Authoritarian***

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I think it's a hamfisted allusion to the fact that Communists who ironically are Leninist and not communist. Are authoritarians like Republicans. Though who knows