this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
104 points (100.0% liked)

Science

4111 readers
47 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NightAuthor@beehaw.org 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Powered a single microchip for six months with the chip just burning cycles for 45 minutes on and 15 minutes off. Further details not provided in article. Probably in the paper if you wanna read that.

[–] Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] NightAuthor@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago

Buried all the way down in the abstract, damn. Glad I didn’t go seeking this info myself, would have wasted a lot of time reading that paragraph.

[–] Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

I tried a quick google to see how much it uses but I guess it depends on peripherals.

[–] hanni@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] NightAuthor@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

No details on what the processor is even doing, only that they technically consider it a "computer"

[–] ddnomad@infosec.pub 3 points 2 years ago
[–] nothacking@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

... and light. This is a solar panel. Cool, but not really ground breaking as the article suggests.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

With embedded battery, where neither depend on mined metals, both are biodegradable and non toxic, and it's carbon fixing (negative greenhouse gas impact). Yeah that's fucking groundbreaking.

[–] nothacking@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You don't need a battery, just a capacitor for these levels of power draw, and you would be hard pressed to find a material that is more abundant on earth then silicon.