politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
DOGE was never about cutting spending and I hate when the media frames it that way. I don’t know what they teach in journalism school but pretending to not know what time it is has to be a required course. It’s like when they use “free speech absolutist” (even ironically) to describe Elon Musk. He was never that and if you believed it and are disappointed, I hope you were just not paying attention. Motherfucker was being sued for discrimination and promising flight attendants horses to get his dick sucked and people act like he betrayed his formerly-held values.
I don’t know what they teach in journalism school
It's not what they don't teach. It's that what they do teach is immediately and unobjectionally discarded by the oligarch paying their salary.
If something doesn't benefit the ownership or the ideals promoted by the ownership, it won't be published. If it's in opposition to the ownership or their ability to retain wealth and power, the journalists behind it won't be employed any longer. Outside of publicly-funded or independent journalism, journalistic integrity and unbiased reporting are practically dead.
This is what happens when news and media are consolidated into a few large conglomerates owned by a wealthy few.
the MSM are all owned by conservative, and you can see why they are reporting this way, just not to offend trump and give him as much air-time as possible.
Are you talking about this article specifically? It seems like this article is taking the promise Trump made and following all the dollars to prove exactly how that promise was bullshit. This seems like journalism at work.
No. Accounting for it all is actual journalism. Pretending they’re trying to save money when they’re openly trying to replace professionals with loyalists is journalistic malpractice.
If you read this article and thought, “journalistic malpractice”, I think you gotta reset your understanding of what journalism is. They can’t just say “oh, this smells like bullshit so we’re going to write articles about how it’s bullshit”. If that’s what they did, then there is no difference between journalism and lemmy comments.
They have to actually research the facts surrounding the claims like a scientist would. Start from the assumption that what they’re saying is true, then follow the numbers to come to a conclusion. Now the conclusion is not based some feeling, it is based on actual data.
We can now say not only did it smell like bullshit, but thanks to these journalists we can identify exactly how it is bullshit.
Par for the Course (pun intended) when republicans take control. Anything they whine about is projection; From national debt to sex crimes to censorship. Scream loud enough so when you begin doing it you can claim that your opponents have done it for forever and a day after the inevitable pushback. These are not creative people.
Believe it or not, all of it was spent on golf!
Honestly I'd rather money be wasted on golf than dismantling the entire US
Unfortunately he seems very capable of multitasking in that regard
golf is where most "behind the scenes business deals go on though"
That is what they say.
Dismantling? All he's done is progress a Police State.
What we want is actual dismantling.
I saw the story of a 60 mil fighter jet falling off a aircraft carrier. Kind of odd to think that that one incident will counteract my entire life's tax contribution multiple times over. Glad I'm making a difference guys.
What makes you think that's an uncommon event? The US military is a grift. They trash equipment under every administrstion to drive up income for shareholders of military contractors
Oh no, I totally believe it
Someone said, “I rather him go golfing with our money than going to foreign aid.” Wtf?
Lots of Americans are hateful
Yeah because it's probably going into the pockets of his nazi friends.
It's almost as though there's massive contradictions in conservative ideology.
he did say to his supporters," i dont care about you, just your votes"
whoa. drumpf not doing what he promised? SAY IT ISN'T SO!
Him doing what he says he will has been the problem
BUT they DID Eliminate MY Social Security so that's a Plus!
As someone currently on SSDI and terrified by what's been happening in the last 100 or so days.....that's not funny 😜
What is SSDI?
Social security disability insurance.
I see. Yeah it is scary for sure. The wealthy may very well strip away the pittance that you get to try to survive. 😥 Good luck, comrade!
Police States are expensive.
LOL, LMAO, LOL
Just cutting things for fun, anyone said anything about spending less?
That's OK, since our tariffs tax is giving the government even more.
No /s?
I thought it wouldn't be needed here, but since I have similar up votes and down votes, I was apparently incorrect.
They have a point though. That’s us chipping in some additional money for the government to blow.
Man, I really thought my comment wouldn't require a /s to know I was being sarcastic.
Ah. Than the first 100 days of last year. Here I couldn't tell from the title, and really I wouldn't be surprised either way.