this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
810 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23520 readers
2102 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 116 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

It’s the golfing. And the grifting, that too.

Edit: also, flights to deport citizens to gulags.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

It's also that cutting doesn't necessarily lead to spending less. I can cut 50 dollars on lunch, but then I end up real hungry, get fired and can't resist a honey bun from the vending machine.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Its not even that.

It is throwing away your jacket because you don't want to go out for lunch in the middle of the day. And then realizing you still need that jacket to get to and from work and having to buy a new one. And THEN buying lunch anyway because you are hungry.

A few articles have done a great job of documenting it but it boils down to the problem being the fundamental argument of WHY they are doing this. Officially their stance is to move fast, break things, and then repair what they actually needed. Except those repairs cost a LOT of time and money.

And... to add on to the brutally beaten metaphor: It also costs money to get rid ofy our old jacket because you can't just throw it in the trash. You have to drive down to a good will to drop it off. Because government employees have PTO that needs to be paid out and so forth.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

It is absolutely incredible that the only thing that outweighs their malice is their gross incompetence, which for better or worse may be our saving grace in undoing this mess

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Any articles you'd recommend?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

But what if you make a department of Honey Bun Efficiency? There is surely a simple solution for your fiscal crisis.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean we were deporting people at higher numbers than Trump has for as long as I know. Trump's just spending more money to deport less. Some might call it horrible money management skills.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And I’m sure he’s paying El Salvador, and for all these flights, and then for creating and distributing all of these propaganda videos and Kristi Noem tv commercials. Have to make a big spectacle about it. That’s not cheap.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

DOGE was never about cutting spending and I hate when the media frames it that way. I don’t know what they teach in journalism school but pretending to not know what time it is has to be a required course. It’s like when they use “free speech absolutist” (even ironically) to describe Elon Musk. He was never that and if you believed it and are disappointed, I hope you were just not paying attention. Motherfucker was being sued for discrimination and promising flight attendants horses to get his dick sucked and people act like he betrayed his formerly-held values.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago

I don’t know what they teach in journalism school

It's not what they don't teach. It's that what they do teach is immediately and unobjectionally discarded by the oligarch paying their salary.

If something doesn't benefit the ownership or the ideals promoted by the ownership, it won't be published. If it's in opposition to the ownership or their ability to retain wealth and power, the journalists behind it won't be employed any longer. Outside of publicly-funded or independent journalism, journalistic integrity and unbiased reporting are practically dead.

This is what happens when news and media are consolidated into a few large conglomerates owned by a wealthy few.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

the MSM are all owned by conservative, and you can see why they are reporting this way, just not to offend trump and give him as much air-time as possible.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Are you talking about this article specifically? It seems like this article is taking the promise Trump made and following all the dollars to prove exactly how that promise was bullshit. This seems like journalism at work.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No. Accounting for it all is actual journalism. Pretending they’re trying to save money when they’re openly trying to replace professionals with loyalists is journalistic malpractice.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

If you read this article and thought, “journalistic malpractice”, I think you gotta reset your understanding of what journalism is. They can’t just say “oh, this smells like bullshit so we’re going to write articles about how it’s bullshit”. If that’s what they did, then there is no difference between journalism and lemmy comments.

They have to actually research the facts surrounding the claims like a scientist would. Start from the assumption that what they’re saying is true, then follow the numbers to come to a conclusion. Now the conclusion is not based some feeling, it is based on actual data.

We can now say not only did it smell like bullshit, but thanks to these journalists we can identify exactly how it is bullshit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 weeks ago

Par for the Course (pun intended) when republicans take control. Anything they whine about is projection; From national debt to sex crimes to censorship. Scream loud enough so when you begin doing it you can claim that your opponents have done it for forever and a day after the inevitable pushback. These are not creative people.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Believe it or not, all of it was spent on golf!

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Honestly I'd rather money be wasted on golf than dismantling the entire US

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Unfortunately he seems very capable of multitasking in that regard

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

golf is where most "behind the scenes business deals go on though"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

That is what they say.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I saw the story of a 60 mil fighter jet falling off a aircraft carrier. Kind of odd to think that that one incident will counteract my entire life's tax contribution multiple times over. Glad I'm making a difference guys.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

What makes you think that's an uncommon event? The US military is a grift. They trash equipment under every administrstion to drive up income for shareholders of military contractors

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Oh no, I totally believe it

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Someone said, “I rather him go golfing with our money than going to foreign aid.” Wtf?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Lots of Americans are hateful

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah because it's probably going into the pockets of his nazi friends.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago

It's almost as though there's massive contradictions in conservative ideology.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago

everything that comes out of Trump's mouth is bullshit in case you haven't noticed

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago

he did say to his supporters," i dont care about you, just your votes"

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

whoa. drumpf not doing what he promised? SAY IT ISN'T SO!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Him doing what he says he will has been the problem

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

BUT they DID Eliminate MY Social Security so that's a Plus!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

As someone currently on SSDI and terrified by what's been happening in the last 100 or so days.....that's not funny 😜

[–] iknowitwheniseeit 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Social security disability insurance.

[–] iknowitwheniseeit 1 points 2 weeks ago

I see. Yeah it is scary for sure. The wealthy may very well strip away the pittance that you get to try to survive. 😥 Good luck, comrade!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

Police States are expensive.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

LOL, LMAO, LOL

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Just cutting things for fun, anyone said anything about spending less?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's OK, since our tariffs tax is giving the government even more.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I thought it wouldn't be needed here, but since I have similar up votes and down votes, I was apparently incorrect.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They have a point though. That’s us chipping in some additional money for the government to blow.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Man, I really thought my comment wouldn't require a /s to know I was being sarcastic.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Ah. Than the first 100 days of last year. Here I couldn't tell from the title, and really I wouldn't be surprised either way.

load more comments
view more: next ›