this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
334 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23545 readers
2616 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Unfit in more ways than one.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I imagine he'd feel pretty out of place in an intelligence briefing.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago

It just becomes a briefing while he's in the room

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

It takes him over a week to save up enough intelligence to make it through one of them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They just gave him pictures

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Probably just emojis, much like:

👊🇺🇸🔥

Once he understands by clapping, they give him a cheerio on his high hair table.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

They literally had to include his name in every part of it, otherwise he didn't pay attention. That was the first term. Clearly he's not even pretending to sit through it now.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We know djt is lazy fuck. I wonder what evil asshole(s) is really running things.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Stephen Miller, obviously.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

I still think musk is involved too. He is trying to get less publicity, but no way he is giving away the power.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Fucker both looks and acts like Putin.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also a dildo. I'm 99% sure that dude began life as a dildo. Never stopped either.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Dildo factory reject. Testers reported discomfort due to what's known in the industry as "Shapiro syndrome" or sudden vaginal dessication.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

It's that Eastern European pedophile rizz. He and Jared Kushner have the same look.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Someone said in another thread he exhibits signs of ASD, and I can't stop thinking about that, especially knowing that that has significant symptom overlap/comorbidity with other things, ADHD, for example.

Who's running the country? Miller?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nah, he very clearly has dementia, and has had it for a while now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

That doesn't preclude ASD, ADHD. And I'm not saying he has that, just that I'm mulling the possibility.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

MF is the leader of the free world and has less meetings than I do

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

The US and its president are definitely not leading the free world. Maybe still a leading world economy. But at this point, the country is actively destroying its own economy and is on its way out of even being considered part of the free world at all.

[–] RamblingPanda 1 points 1 week ago

Leader my ass. The rest of the world is moving on.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

He doesn't do intelligence.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you really want him to be at more? The more he knows the more Putin knows. Unless someone leaks it on signal again then we all know.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Don't worry, he has staffers to leak all the other information through their Starlink connection at the White House.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I thought he skipped like almost all of them last time too? This is just par for the course

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

That's why he had to take the notes back home to study. Duh!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Depends on the course and what he decides is his handicap that day.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Don't worry, he's got his eyes on the ball the whole time

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

He has concepts of intelligence

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Eh, I hear that sometimes he loses the ball, claims a do-over to keep his golf score down.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Why change now?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

the only intelligence briefing he will sit through, is Putins issuing orders to dismantle every intelligence agency or investigation against putin.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

12 too many.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The people giving the briefings should just jingle some keys to get his attention.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Or a hot and fresh hamberder

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Probably for the best. Can't leak what he isn't told.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Should hold fake meetings with finger paints.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

So he is at - 25 now?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Public record: Trump lacks intelligence.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

So approximately 1 per week. Seems reasonable enough.

They aren’t “daily intelligence briefings”, they’re “intelligence briefings”. Basically no president ever attended them daily.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Each president is different in the manner and pace at which they receive their briefings, and Trump is not entirely out of step with some of his predecessors.

But with Trump, there is added concern as he is known not to read the accompanying briefing document, referred to as “the book,” that is put together by intelligence analysts in a highly labor-intensive process. This document is delivered in hard copy or on a tablet device to the president and his key advisers five days a week.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

And especially now where times are particularly quaint and idyllic there's no reason for the guy not to enjoy spring time on his golf course.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

More intelligence could do the guy some good. He can't answer basic questions about things like his responsibility to abide by his sworn oath as well as how many signal leaks there have been at any given moment.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Y'all, elect me President. I'd go to ALL the intelligence meetings.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How many bowls of candy has he eaten is the more important question to ask here.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the bigger question how many meals of Mcdonalds he has eaten in a day, and how many layers of orange creme concealer he uses on his face,

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Annnnnd is that too many, too little, average?

Don't get me wrong, I despise the gu but I have no clue how many is normal 😅

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Clue is in the name... daily intelligence briefing.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Woops, one too many negronis.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

No such thing!

load more comments
view more: next ›