this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
1330 points (100.0% liked)

News

29373 readers
3311 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Republicans are drunk with power. What a stupid fucking idea. There’s no chance of banning porn. Then they wouldn’t be able to jerk to Trans women and feel shame after.

Trans women are hot, in case that reads as though the shame is correct. It’s not.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 93 points 1 day ago (7 children)

If you think the porn industry is exploitative and abusive now, just wait until they push it all underground.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Woah, that's a thought that hadn't occurred to me. You're absolutely right.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This is true about almost every vice. That's why Prohibition didn't work. Almost as soon as alcohol was banned, people started making very adulterated products, people died, organized crime became a thing. It's the same idea with cannabis, sex work, other drugs, etc. The result of prohibition is almost always people getting hurt.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I’m pretty anti-porn just like I’m very anti-religion but neither of these things can be killed by banning them. The idea that banning porn will somehow prevent people from accessing it when we know even people in NK or places like the Middle East can access it is just crazy, of course Americans will continue to be able to access it, and like you said this will just push production and distribution underground actually exacerbating the issues with the porn industry. I have few actual complaints about the end result of porn, I don’t believe it’s good or healthy but as a product to be consumed it’s only moderately harmful but the production of porn is where the real evils are found. This will lead to those in the porn industry being abused at rates and in ways currently unfathomable or illegal.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

Just think about the popularity of the "schoolgirl/barely legal" image as it currently exists in porn. If it becomes just as illegal to hire a young-looking 25 year old actress as it is to exploit an actual child, a lot producers will opt for the latter.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It would be for 10 hours, then Trump would remove the bill and be seen as an hero. As usual.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (10 children)

There's SCOTUS precedent saying that pornography--but not obscenity--is covered by 1A. (Obscenity isn't very well defined, but it's generally understood to mean pedophilia/anything involving minors (including drawings), certain acts of violence combined with sex, bestiality, and possibly necrophilia. Other extreme sexual acts--such as crush fetishes--might also fall under obscenity.) You can't pass laws to unspool constitutional rights; your only legal recourse is either stacking the court with people that want to change precedent, or amend the constitution.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

This bill is trying to get it all legally classified as obscenity. They're leaning into obscenity already being illegal, they just want to extend the classification to include basically all nudity and porn.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Or just do what Trump, his administration, and the Republicans are doing. Move fast, break things, then tell the court 'oops, you're too late.' Trump and the Republicans don't care about the law, they only reason they pass anything through the house is because they want it to have more legitimacy than just a Presidential declaration. If it doesn't pass the house it'll still be the law. Just not on any books.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

hmmm wherever could we find a bunch of justices that would want to change precedent....🤔

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago (16 children)

At this point, US politics has gone far beyond the point where we can make jokes about morons voting for the face-eating leopard party. Anybody who didn't vote for Kamala Harris because she wasn't critical enough of Israel, didn't do enough for LGBTQ rights, didn't have enough left wing policies, etc. is now reaping what they sow.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Oh wow, I hope they do it. Nothing is going to upset the MAGA crowd faster than losing access to the trans pornography they view in the privacy of their own homes while condemning publicly. I'd imagine a lot of them are not going to understand VPN.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago

Nah this type of law exists to be selectively applied, that's what makes it so great.

The only people who it will be applied to are those who are "undesirable" or step out of line.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Do it, cowards.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

doesnt even trigger me anymore. tomorrow the legion of dumbasses will come up with something way stupider. place your bets now!

Moon of America? ...been there fIrSt! Annex earth?

it will be stupider!

[–] [email protected] 66 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The American porn industry is as big as Hollywood. This is a big billions of dollars market. And the US porn industry provides 90% of international porn. So Trump and his GOP wants to kill the one last American industry where the US is world market leader by far.

And I can easily see this industry moving to countries where actors are cheaper and less protected from abuse, diseases, and whatever else happening in this industry.

While this will make some religious fundamentalists in the US feel superior and give them a sense of a perceived moral high ground, it will actually hurt the most vulnerable people in the chain the most. It will not reduce the amount of porn made, it will just make it much, much worse for those involved.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (4 children)

So we gonna have people in the corner selling uncensored like in japan?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These people really can't just mind their own business.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Someone should make a bunch of AI generated porn of Mike Lee being gang banged by like 40 huge black dudes and post it all over Facebook.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Donald doesn’t know anything about Project 2025 though. herp derp

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 128 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Check this guy's computer first. Guarantee there's some fucked up shit on there. It's always projection.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 345 points 2 days ago (24 children)

They don't intend to ban anything. They're just creating reasons to lock people up.

They are, to a man, insane authoritarian shitbags. All they care about is control.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Is it because they know that Russian porn is better than American porn?

[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Brought to you by a president who f****d a pornstar and paid her off by falsifying business records.

Clown world for a clown species.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 days ago (6 children)

The Puritans are still ruling in that stupid country.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 158 points 2 days ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›