this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
1594 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

8078 readers
3335 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

This is fair if you're just copy-pasting answers, but what if you use the AI to teach yourself concepts and learn things? There are plenty of ways to avoid hallucinations, data-poisoning and obtain scientifically accurate information from LLMs. Should that be off the table as well?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

And yet once they graduate, if the patients are female and/or not white all concerns for those standards are optional at best, unless the patients bring a (preferably white) man in with them to vouch for their symptoms.

Not pro-ai, just depressed about healthcare.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

In terms of grade school, essay and projects were of marginal or nil educational value and they won't be missed.

Until the last 20 years, 100% of the grade for medicine was by exams.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Well, this just looks like criteria for a financially sucessful person.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (14 children)

This is a problem with integrity, not AI. If I have AI write me a paper and then proof read it to make sure the information is accurate and properly sourced how is that wrong?

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

I'm so tired of this rhetoric.

How do students prove that they have "concern for truth .. and verifying things with your own eyes" ? Citations from published studies? ChatGPT draws its responses from those studies and can cite them, you ignorant fuck. Why does it matter that ChatGPT was used instead of google, or a library? It's the same studies no matter how you found them. Your lack of understanding how modern technology works isn't a good reason to dismiss anyone else's work, and if you do you're a bad person. Fuck this author and everyone who agrees with them. Get educated or shut the fuck up. Locking thread.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›