this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
140 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23813 readers
3475 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Yup

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 57 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Me: Just reads the post headline

Me: Yes

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 days ago

One of the few times Bettridge has been wrong.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

People need to understand that there is a difference between cryptocurrencies that have their own blockchain, and tokens that ride on smart contracts on those same blockchains.

Bitcoin and Ethereum are two examples of cryptocurrencies with their own blockchains. This means that new coins are released periodically based on some algorithm that all nodes agree on, and the rules can't be changed arbitrarily. (Ironically, the first real memecoin, Dogecoin, is basically a clone of Bitcoin with some tweaks, but it has its own blockchain and its own set of rules).

Neary all of these memecoins (Dogecoin being the main exception) do not have their own blockchains at all. They are just smart contracts riding on top of Ethereum or one of its clones. Anyone can make a new memecoin simply by starting a new smart contract. Anyone. You can literally make a new token with a marketable name out of nothing, with trillions of tradeble units, then send a bit to crypto exchanges and pay them to set up trading with the liquidity you just gave them. People start trading, and now this coin (you made from nothing) has a price attached. It may only be a fraction of a cent, but you have trillions. If it catches on, and the price goes up, you can now release more and sell it for real money.

You simply can't do that with established currencies with their own blockchains, because the creation of new units is governed by so many rules. You could always create your own Bitcoin or Ethereum clone, but then you are stuck building your own validation network until other people decide it's worth participating in validation. The only entities who have been successful doing this lately are exchanges (who then use their captive exchange coin to enable smart contracts to sell shitcoins on).

So yes, memecoins are scams. Crypto on its own blockchain is not, but if it's main use is to enable scams then what's the difference? Bitcoin, Ethereum, and (ironically) Dogecoin are fundamentally different than most shitcoins (and the exchange-owned Ethereum clones that only exist to enable trading in more shitcoins.)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Not all memecoins are scams, some are just memes and are 100% community distributed.

People also usually know what they’re getting with memecoins.

The VC backed shite is far scammier. They actually lie, manipulate the price and dump their tokens for maximum profit.

And Wdym established currencies with their own blockchains? You can mint tokens on solana, cardano and plenty of others.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You can mint tokens on solana, cardano and plenty of others.

Exactly. And most of those tokens are shitty, because anyone can make them, and they are not useful for anything. The few that have utility are only useful because they have been declared by their founders to represent some other asset: dollars (like Tether), votes in some governance protocol, even access to the President.

Whereas SOL and ADA can't just be made on demand, by anyone. The native cryptocurrency has some scarcity at least. And utility, but let's face it, their main utility is to create the shitty tokens. (I bought some ADA in the hopes that their smart contracts would be interesting, it turns out all I bought was regret.)

Still, I'd much rather buy SOL or ADA than the craptastic tokens they enable.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Well, SOL and ADA were made on demand, technically ;) That's why proof of work is king. I mean here's the Solana insiders laughing about dumping on retail

https://xcancel.com/GooseOfCrypto/status/1456002541808807938

I dont mind memecoins when they're done right. Transparent, fair distribution, etc. There's also a 'DegenFinance' category of dApps with things that are openly advertised as gambling. One even as a Ponzi (Lock your assets in a smart-contract, pay a fee to unlock, fee goes to the people who stay in longer). Plenty of legit projects building on those platforms too, but yeah unless you're interesting in things like yield, lending, bonds, synthetics, etc - probably not going to ring your bell.

eUTXO is interesting, but Chuck is a hype merchant and people failed to realise how long it'd take to develop everything again from scratch

And thankfully there is a PoW chain that also runs eUTXO, has even more expressive smart contracts, optional privacy built into the core, and a fair launch with no VCs. (Ergo)

Outwith that, Bitcoin Cash is also interesting. They don't have an expressive smart contract language, but have achieved some complex defi with token scripting + off chain. Some cool Lunarpunk projects like DarkFi too although they are private by default so not suitable for mass appeal. But yeah, if Satoshi were still active he'd have forced 90% of the space to call themselves something other than crypto as it's an insult to the original vision.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

The expression "No Shit Sherlock" presents itself.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Here's a better question, have you ever seen anything that leads you to believe that Trump and Tate would willingly do something for someone other than themselves?

Yeah, it's a fucking scam.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Idk how journalists still don't get it after all of these years.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

They're doing their job: keep conservatives in power.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago

Crypto is a ponzi scheme playacting at being a currency or investment vehicle. Meme coins just dispense with playacting and aim for shorter time horizons on cashing out from the ponzi scheme.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago

Are two infamous grifters grifting?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Corporate needs you to find the difference.

Memecoins

NFTs

ಠ_ಠ

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Memecoin is when NFT > 1

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

Does any meme coin not have a depreciating curve?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

Why the fuck would anyone care if they're running a scam, they're anti-social rapists. There's a different thing society is supposed to do to anti-social rapists.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

C'mon Guardian, do we really need experts for this one?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

One word article: Yes

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

people bribing you want to be fleeced.