this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
617 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

12175 readers
563 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 124 points 2 weeks ago (21 children)

Snow–free roads seem like a beneficial thing for most modes of transport though.

[–] [email protected] 93 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Judging by that picture, pedestrians can get fucked though.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 weeks ago

Judging by that picture, pedestrians can get fucked though.

A picture can be deceiving.

That picture is of work being down on a part of Lyon street south of DeVos Performance Hall and Convention center, between Monroe Avenue and the Grand River.

(Don’t let the name fool you, DeVos Hall and DeVos Center are owned by the city. They’re just named after the billionaires who paid a chunk of change for its construction and subsequent renovations.)

The reconstruction there is to make the area much better for pedestrians. There used to be a some parking along that street, which I think when the work will be finished will be purely for valet service for the hotel on the south side of the street. That part of the street has been at least partially closed to cars for a while, even though most of the work is done. And I wouldn’t be shocked if those sidewalks are already heated.

As I said elsewhere, they’ve added a really nice seating area at the end of the street (you can’t really see it in this picture because it goes down toward the Grand River). This also better connects Monroe Avenue (where the picture is taken) to the walking bridge behind DeVos Hall that goes over the Grand River to the Gerald R Ford Presidential Library and Museum. Just across the street from that is the Grand Rapids Public Museum, with yet another pedestrian/cyclist only bridge back across the river.

Just behind the camera and about a block south is Rosa Parks Circle, another pedestrian focused area with safe access to several restaurants with outdoor seating and the Grand Rapids Art Museum.

In short, this is a very walkable part of town. It isn’t perfect, but it’s far from “pedestrians can get fucked.”

Also as I stated elsewhere, heating under the street like this can prevent the accumulation of snow which would be plowed onto sidewalks or bike lanes, and the accumulation of ice which would be treated with salt that would then run into the Grand River. It’s a very good solution for the specific problem faced by this city.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

Hey it might not be a total retrofit.. the sidewalks could already have it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] [email protected] 74 points 2 weeks ago (31 children)

You may not quite realize for how long roads are impassible to all traffic in northern states. Where I live, a couple hundred miles south of Grand Rapids, the snow and ice still make roads entirely impassible for a total of a week or so every winter; it takes the coordinated effort of hundreds of salt trucks and plows to get it cleaned out enough to drive, bus, walk, or bike on. Then that same effort has to be expended again a couple of weeks later.

Piping existing waste heat underground into a system like this, when the road is uncovered for repair anyway, would make a lot of sense for high-traffic areas so that plows can focus on other locations instead; it would also reduce the salt budget and plow fuel budget, and reduce the maintenance budget for cleanup and repair due to salt damage.

Going even a little bit further north, this would likely be even more effective. In some Michigan cities, roofed streets make economic sense; this seems even more cost-effective and less likely to require heavy repair.

Bike lanes, public transportation, roadway maintenance, and snow & ice clearing are all expensive. None of them have to turn a profit.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The downsides, the same weather that makes the snow and frost also causes shifts in the ground during freeze thaw cycles, causing damage to the road and heating pipes. The warm melt water also enters waterways and cause shifts in seasonal temperatures, messing with fish and insect hatching times causing them to potentially hatch too early for the spring food they rely on.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Since damage to the pipes and to the road tends to be concurrent, they can repair one when they repair the other.

As for the meltwater, this is going to be a fairly small amount of hot water in a regional sense. Snow is fluffy, but it's about 10x less dense than in its liquid state; meaning that ten inches of snowmelt is the equivalent of only about an inch of rain. That's about 27,000 gallons per mile of roadway (a mile is about an acre) going into the storm sewers, which is more or less the same amount of water that a large building goes through in a day. But this snowmelt isn't a daily occurrence, it's only going to happen a few times a year.

I recognize that I just did a lot of handwaving, but the point is that, to within an order of magnitude, it's hundreds of times less impact than building another large office building (which cities do frequently).

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)
[–] [email protected] 73 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So many people get heated driveways, use it for a year, get the cost for running it and never use it again...

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

It seems like it would only be close to “reasonable” to run in a place where snow is so minimal that you don’t even need to bother dealing with it.

But if you live somewhere like where I live, where a bad storm is 10-14” of snow, that’s gotta take what, days of running the system?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Not really. You're thinking of using it to clear 10-14" of snow that's already built up. But with the street being kept just above freezing during the snowstorm, the snow hitting the street will melt immediately, never sticking to begin with.

And since you only need 5° or so above freezing, it takes less energy than you might think to keep it there.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Watching this video of someone in buffalo ny who has one:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=W-x9o5IEtMo

It definitely seems to keep up fairly well with what looks like very heavy snowfall but struggles quite a bit, especially towards the end (around 9m).

Statistics posted at the end as well; $26.33 for this storm. In buffalo that could add up pretty quick.

Though granted looking at the snowfall on the minivan I would much rather be this person than the person next door with god knows how much snow to dig through. I have a snow blower and even with that the really bad storms are a nightmare to deal with. Tbf I only have a weenie blower because 80% of the time snow around here is 3-6” at worst, only the really bad storms bring 12+ and we haven’t had one of those in a while

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Think about how much you'd want to be paid per hour and how many hours it would take to clear 14" of snow. Compare that to the $26.33 it cost this guy. Seems cheep to me.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I can't imagine it costing less money overall to run it longer versus only once snow has piled up.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

There is the added warming you get from the sun, when the snow doesn't build up. You loose that if you wait for the storm to be over.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

We have a narrow walkway of our pretty steep driveway heated. It came in clutch several times when we had black ice, but is also useful in snow.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I installed this in residential doing construction back in the day. It's incredibly cost effective.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

written by someone who has never been to michigan.
fyi, Michigan is a peninsula surrounded by the great lakes… it has it’s own special snow….
(see also, lake effect snow).

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Yeah, but it's not that special. Heated surfaces like this are ungodly expensive, both to construct and run.

Source: I priced doing this for my driveway.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

west michigan IS that special. you either clear the roads, or you don’t use them.
and there are a lot of roads and a limited amount of plows… downtown in a larger city like GR, it makes perfect sense.
for the record, Lake Michigan generates it’s own clouds and snow, and the wind is constantly blowing west to east… it snows a lot more than you think… and very suddenly

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean this has a specific use case

You don't have to be negative about everything just because you don't understand it

It's not like you live in doomworld, doomsilvanya, 10230

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago

That's what I was thinking. Downtown areas are difficult for snow removal and if this just sends it all down the sewers, this could be a huge savings.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 weeks ago (13 children)

I mean, this saves salt from going and wrecking the environment

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

just use coarse sand, prevents slipping on ice.

done

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Does this actually work? It seems a massive waste of money, you just need a heavy truck to pass on the road to have a pipe leak and break the whole system

Not to mention the energy cost to keep it over 0° C for all the winter

[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

You wouldn't believe the secondary costs caused by thawing salt. And then there's the primary cost of operating vehicle park to spread a lot of salt each winter.

Although general streets would not be my first choice (you should start with bridges where corrosion is even more of an issue) every example of heated street I saw was just a matter of "yeah, simple math says this makes sense".

PS: And that's obviously not car-specific even. Every newly build bike lane should incorporate this idea. Modern bike and pedestrian bridges doubly so.

PPS: For reference: new bicycle-bridge in Germany... 16 million € to build, of which the added heating is a very small fraction (300k).

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Although general streets would not be my first choice (you should start with bridges where corrosion is even more of an issue)

When I lived in Grand Rapids in '08 I was told the big bridge across the river was heated. So they probably did start there.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, it works. They do it in Norway... For the sidewalks.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

what's the norwegian word for feeling bad for someone else's shame?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I regularly walk through a pedestrian area that has such heating here in Helsinki. Most of the time it works, but when it gets cold enough and there's a lot of new snow, the snow just turns into a wet slush that people walk through until it freezes into a horrible icy mess dotted with deep footprints. It's quite a contrast to the nice and relatively even packed snow around the place at such times. Drainage is important, as is keeping the power level adequately high. Half measures will fail if the conditions get bad.

If they also plow the bulk of the snow off when it's fresh, then it could work nicely.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

it can save money over labor and increased road maintenance of snow plows, it also makes it significantly less of a trip hazard because ice patches get removed faster.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] And009 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 106 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why is this reply so damn funny to me?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Grand Rapids isn’t the most bike-friendly city, but it’s also very far from the worst. I bike through it somewhat regularly, and have only come close to dying once (while biking over the speed limit on Lake Drive in East GR, but not fast enough for one asshole who decided to pass me illegally and almost got hit).

We could certainly use more bike lanes, but we have some good trails in Kent County.

This method of snow prevention is awesome when the weather is right. You keep ice and snow from accumulating in the first place, so it doesn’t need to be plowed and end up blocking the very sidewalks and bikelanes we want. And it also means you don’t need nearly as much salt.

It’s not a perfect solution, but it’s not a bad one either.

Edit: Also this is near an area that is being redone to be largely pedestrian-focused. Cars have been cut off from a good chunk of that road I think, the parking garage exit that goes onto that street has been closed for over a year now. Maybe it will reopen, but regardless, they’ve added a lovely little sitting area down that street. And just down that street where this is shot there’s a lovely walking bridge over the Grand River to the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library/Museum, which is just across the street from the Grand Rapids Public Museum, which has yet another walking bridge (the Blue Bridge) over the Grand River back to this side.

In other words, this is a very walkable part of the city. Again, not perfect, but better than lots of places.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How long until those water lines are rendered useless by street cracks?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Probably longer than we'd expect, because the street will crack less if it's kept at a consistent temp?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Itt, people defending cars in fuck cars

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Trams need only heated switches, just saying.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I went to an onsen (hot spring) town in Japan. They have hot spring water, so on a lot of the streets business owners just turn the hose on and point it downhill. Worked pretty well for keeping the streets clear of snow, but requires a lot of existing geographical conditions.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Doesn't that make the roads slippery? And if there's a real cold wave, it all might flash-freeze regardless.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

There are a couple of bikeways that are heated and it actually saves money, because the way lasts longer. But I believe that's mostly used on bridges, because the salt would otherwise damage the bridge. I don't know if this works out for normal roads, too

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

That only makes sense in places, where you have free heat. Like in Iceland. Where they basically sit on volcanos. Other than that, this is just a waste of money and resources.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

I am pretty sure there is plenty of excess heat in the sewers of most cities. Compared to having to redo the street and sewers from salt damage, operate a fleet of plows and all the other currently used measures, it could even be worth it if the heat comes from a boiler.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›