this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
446 points (100.0% liked)

News

30276 readers
3805 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A man who was believed to be part of a peacekeeping team for the “No Kings” protest in Salt Lake City shot at a person who was brandishing a rifle at demonstrators, striking both the rifleman and a bystander who later died at the hospital, authorities said Sunday.

Police took the alleged rifleman, Arturo Gamboa, 24, into custody Saturday evening on a murder charge, Salt Lake City Police Chief Brian Redd said at a Sunday news conference. The bystander was Arthur Folasa Ah Loo, 39, a fashion designer from Samoa.

Detectives don’t yet know why Gamboa pulled out a rifle or ran from the peacekeepers, but they accused him of creating the dangerous situation that led to Ah Loo’s death. The Associated Press did not immediately find an attorney listed for Gamboa or contact information for his family in public records.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 23 hours ago

Welcome to a country where "protest peacekeepers" carry guns, and can shoot into the crowd and put the blame on someone else whi just happened to be armed as well.

Do you, American brothers, realize the sheer level of insanity you live in?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

~~so gamboa pulled out a gun, aimed it at protesters,~~ Gamboa was protesting while legally open carrying his rifle at the protest, in support of the protesters, and got shot. the person who shot him also shot a bystander. gamboa is being charged with murder, because of the weird federal murder laws in america.~~ i've read that gamboa is a leftist, so why did he brandish his rifle at the protesters?~~

[–] [email protected] 5 points 18 hours ago

I’ve protested standing directly next to the man and his guns multiple times, the official story here is a bunch of horseshit. Only one person committed gun violence and it wasn’t the well known gun rights and safety advocate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago

apparently, the guy wasn't brandishing his weapon, he was open carrying in support of the protesters, in case the police got violent. the "peacekeeper" (I'm guessing it's a right winger), saw him with his weapon and shot into a crowd of people and killed a protester.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The comments are too fucking confusing. Who shot who?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I think it was like this: A was protesting, B takes out a rifle and aims at protesters. Police (or whatever the 'peacekeeping team' consists of) start shooting at B but they missed aim training on thursday so they kill A instead.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not correct. Person C is the volunteer who is part of 50501 or whatever local organizers put this part of the protest together. B takes out a rifle and runs towards A. Person C shoots person B because Holy Shit What Is B Doing, and hits B but accidentally hits A as well.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Isnt that basically what I said? I just didnt know person Cs job there and label them with a letter

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

major point being person C is not police but a volunteer

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago

Yes I wasnt sure of thatpart, thats why I wrote '(or whatever the 'peacekeeping team consists of)'

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Oh look. A conservative traitor instigated the violence.

I am many shades of unsurprised.

Domestic terrorists folks. Every last one. Because they've all chosen to support it despite knowing. Time to start treating them like the terrorists they are.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's being reported that Arturo is an activist who regularly open-carries in support at protests. Meanwhile you're making confidently incorrect claims that he is a conservative traitor and terrorist. Stay classy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago

Fox news? Lmao

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

You mean the thugs hired by 50501?

I know Arturo, and if you did any sort of due diligence, you’d know he’s a hardcore leftist.

If you think Arturo was a ‘conservative traitor’, I think you have more problems with simply accepting what our right wing media apparatus chooses to push.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (15 children)

What I'm reading is that the guy with a rifle, Gamboa, has attended protests armed before. It looks like the peacekeeper thought he was a shooter, but there's no evidence so far Gamboa did anything illegal.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Yeah in another thread there's an interview of the rifleman from his time in a punk band talking about the system. This is likely going to be a shit show when the partisan pundits pick it up

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 days ago (20 children)

It looks like the peacekeeper thought he was a shooter

As he should.

Brandish a firearm in public, you are attempting to intimidate others, so you'll get treated like the terrorist you are.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Brandish a firearm in public

Be real careful applying the term "brandish".

Utah is a constitutional carry state, meaning anyone 21+ who can legally own a firearm can carry it concealed or openly without a permit.

In my state, Minnesota, you have to take a class and qualify to carry a firearm and during the state approved training your told to follow these steps:

  1. No force - avoidance, retreat or de-escalating
  2. No force - Telephone for help, Verbal warning
  3. Unarmed self defense
  4. Less than lethal - exposing firearm
  5. Deadly force - pointing the firearm at another person, shooting at someone, shooting and killing someone
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Thank you. I didn't wanna have to type anything even as close to good as this.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›