this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2025
394 points (100.0% liked)

World News

47925 readers
2559 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump dismisses leaked assessment suggesting strikes only temporarily disrupted Iran’s nuclear development

Donald Trump said he is weighing forcing journalists who published leaked details from a US intelligence report assessing the impact of the recent American military strikes on Iran to reveal their sources – and the president also claimed his administration may prosecute those reporters and sources if they don’t comply.

In an interview Sunday with Fox News host Maria Bartiromo, Trump doubled down on his claim that the 21 June airstrikes aimed at certain Iranian facilities successfully crippled Iran’s nuclear program. He insisted the attacks destroyed key enriched uranium stockpiles, despite Iranian assertions that the material had been relocated before the strikes.

Trump dismissed the leaked intelligence assessment in question – which suggested the strikes only temporarily disrupted Iran’s nuclear development – as incomplete and biased. The report, circulated among US lawmakers and intelligence officials, concluded that the damage inflicted was significantly less than what Trump’s administration had publicly claimed.

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 hours ago

hegseth already leaks through his alcoholic breath.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 hours ago

They forgot to hang up after ordering the pizzas. Domino’s guy heard the whole thing.

[–] [email protected] 75 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

The funny part is the leak could only have come from inside his administration and party because he withheld briefings from his political opponents

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It could still be from a Dem added to a Signal chat

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 hours ago

Oh is that what that random group chat was last week?

[–] [email protected] 148 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

For some reason, he seems extra butthurt about getting caught lying this time.

[–] [email protected] 80 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

It's because fascists always have to be right and be the strongest. So strong that any resistance means destruction and the only path of survival is to fall in line.

He insisted the attacks destroyed key enriched uranium stockpiles, despite Iranian assertions that the material had been relocated before the strikes.

Trump dismissed the leaked intelligence assessment in question – which suggested the strikes only temporarily disrupted Iran’s nuclear development – as incomplete and biased.

Not only is he not as strong as he says, he looks downright weak. It's personally dangerous to his image and is a test of power to those within the GOP. He needs complete loyalty so others will follow his orders without question. But the question is now "is it worth it?"

And there were real believers within the GOP who wanted to avoid WW3 or a nuclear engagement only to see AIPAC have more pull than actual Americans in the deployment of American muscle. Trump needs to keep those stragglers in line or risk having a shattered party that can't do anything but in-fight over the next 3 years.

He's fighting this so hard because this is a fight for his future.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I really really hope he loses this fight.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago

Well he is losing imo but to who. It’s not democracy.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 15 hours ago

that's because the narrative was important to their long-term goals and has not only ruined the months of setup, but also wasted the efforts.

he's a really lazy man and hates working.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 15 hours ago

It was Hegseth thru a Signal group again

[–] [email protected] 36 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It was Pete Hegseth in a Signal group Biatch

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

in his defense he was, and continues to be, a weak-willed simpering bitch

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

A drunk weak-willed simpering bitch

[–] [email protected] 59 points 17 hours ago

That's how you know the intelligence is accurate.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Reporters should all just say it was Don Jr.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

it was the coke talking

[–] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago

They should say it was Pete Opsec

[–] [email protected] 22 points 17 hours ago

That's called a subpeona, Mr. Trump.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 15 hours ago

Truth hurts MF 🤬

[–] [email protected] 8 points 17 hours ago

Maybe it was Iran?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 15 hours ago

Our source was Mr. Lickma