this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
96 points (100.0% liked)

News

30736 readers
2867 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The jury in Sean “Diddy” Combs’ sex trafficking trial said Tuesday that it has reached a verdict on four of five counts against the hip-hop mogul. But the partial decision remained under wraps after jurors were told to keep deliberating because they were stuck on the top charge, racketeering conspiracy.

Prosecutors, Combs’ defense team and Judge Arun Subramanian reasoned that after just two days of deliberations, it was too soon to give up on reaching a verdict on all counts. So rather than taking a partial verdict, Subramanian told the jury to continue weighing the remaining charge. Deliberations will continue Wednesday.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Can’t stop, won’t stop! Ain’t no party like a Diddy prison shower party!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

Take that, take that

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I get that it's good to be thorough but if dude was found guilty on 4 charges adding up to a minimum of 50 years, (2 counts 15 years, 2 counts 10 years) and the guy is 55 years old. Can't the judge just say they can't be served concurrently, and call it at some point. That puts him in prison to 105 years old, when the expected life span of an African American male is 72.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

No, they can't do that and rightfully so. The man was accused of a crime, and therefore he was a right to a trial by a jury of his peers for each and every charge.

Not only just for the purposes of future appeals, but simply because the US Constitution grants every person in the US that right.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Or at least it did

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Now is the point in history where we have to actualize these wonderful ideas. The US Constitution is a flimsy piece of paper. The only strength it ever had is that which we lend to it, collectively.

It’s all on us.

my mood

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Isn't that the whole purpose? Jury deliberates. They all agreed on 4. Couldn't agree on 1. If you require the jury to be there day after day and you essentially hold them prisoner to do so because it is mandatory... How many days do you hold them until it is effecting their deliberation. If I make you miss your job for week, you may just agree to something to get out the door eventually. A hung jury can't occur if the judge just says "keep deliberating" so there must be some cut off

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

There are rules for when sentencing occurs concurrently or consecutively. Additionally the prosecution should want the most charges possible, in the event that an appeal overturns (or orders a new trial on) only a few of the indicted charges.