255
Rotbrained cuckservative comment section demonstrates why blue states should absolutely ignore their fucking nonsense. Pay the strikers and tell this pedophile administration to go fuck itself.
States rights? Never heard of em
Not when there's a Republican administration!
"Rules for thee, not for me"
Jfc, you weren't kidding. Found some absolute gems in there.
"Choosing not to work is just that, a choice," Rep. Rudy Yakym, R-Ind., said in a statement on the legislation he’s sponsoring.
"While far-left states like Oregon and Washington are busy handing out unemployment checks like participation trophies to anyone who walks off the job, the SHIELD Act puts an end to that nonsense. These radical policies disrupt the labor market, let workers walk off the job without consequences, and leave small businesses high and dry. If you choose to strike, you don't get to collect a check from hardworking Americans, plain and simple," he added.
I'm ready to secede. The workers in the four states this waste of oxygen is targeting can take our collective $90 billion surplus we generously donate to poor red states and go build a modern society with robust public transit with that money instead
I'm mean besides the fact that if the anti fascists left the US the dumb ass Nazis would be broke and done...if choosing not to work is a choice, with consequences, then paying to little, treating employees like shit is also a choice and striking is the goddamn consequence. But this administration seems to forget that Unions were the compromise between the working class to let the rich live.
Cascadia: California, Oregon, Washington... C.O.W
Let's just go with the Pacific States of America, either that or we can go with the North American Union.
Well that’s messed up. “Level the playing field”??? Like businesses and the wealthy oligarchs were being treated unfairly??? Record industry profits with stagnant wages and the problem is the workers???
Exactly. Think they deserve a fucking wage, they're lucky they have a fucking job! /S
"But Kamala would have been worse!" /s
Yep. So tired of the people that completely lost the plot as Taco conducts a war on Americans.
fuck you.
no genocide should be tolerated in any ballot.
All she had to say is that she would stop aid and weapons to a genocide and comply with international law. the democrats lost because they genuinely sucked.
Congrats, you've sacrificed potentially tens of millions while also sacrificing those you wished to save.
if democrats want to win, they should have candidates that aren't republican with pandering.
Fuck off please.
Americans screamed that they don't want genocide. neoliberal dems were like "fuck you, fall in line you plebs"
who's at fault?
Oh my God that's a new point I'd never heard before!
are you saying we should tolerate a genocide?
to get over the greatest humanitarian horror in recent history?
You're tolerating one right now. Not voting for her didn't do shit but make things worse.
For someone so anti genocide, you sure are sounding like someone who is pro Republican, which is very much pro genocide.
It's so unfathomably weird that every single time this comes up, y'all never seem to have anything negative to say about the current administration, or how objectively worse it would have been to elect Fuckface 45 as a president during the election, or the very real threat that Fascist 47 represents to not only Gaza, but to the American people.
What's up with that? Why haven't you condemned with the same fervor the current genocidal administration? Why are you only giving a shit about someone who currently has zero power?
Why are you patting yourself on the back for a "job well done"?
that's like saying, I hate pedophiles and someone going on a rant because apparently that means that i don't mind Nazis because somehow people can only hate the things they explicitly mentioned in one statement.
Of course I hate that fascist cunt. but one thing is that the nazi acts like a nazi. another one is that is opposition, the "good guys", did absolutely nothing to prevent the greatest evils in recent history because they assumed all they had to do was to be slightly less evil than the competition, so they can guzzle up there same corporate donations that trump got while pandering about how they are slightly less evil than Trump.
if I complain more about democrats, is because I'm disappointed and betrayed by them. and now many of them are cow towing to Trump.
Then they fucking blame the public for not ignoring a genocide or the countless inactions they did, like waiting for the elections to try and do anything about RoeVWade, so they could have a carrot for the election rather than doing their job.
The democrats are as much at fault for breaking democracy as trump was. All they had to do is listed to the public and not support a genocide.
And they deserve so much anger for not releasing the Epstein files as well, because we all know many democrats and their donors are on the list as well. The whole system is broken and rotten you the core.
And we can fix it, just not as long as we consider the democrats as our saviour. Look at Mamdani, a popular candidate with popular policies and the democrats are doing all they can to torpedo him. They aren't the left, they are right wing with pandering.
Fuck off regressive shill. You let the Nazis in the door.
Like that fucking lady in Sinners who was so upset that she invited the vampires into their juke joint smh
Man; spoilers.
I was referring to the band Sinner https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinner_%28band%29?wprov=sfla1
Apologies for the misunderstanding
I bet if I drew a swastika on your shoe...you'd defiantly shoot your own foot off, wouldn't you?
While some people care passionately about the genocide, if every single person who stayed home or voted third party over Gaza had showed up to vote, Trump still would've won.
That issue wasn't as important to the election as seemingly anyone wants to believe. Kamala lost because of the perception of the economy, which is the issue that ultimately decides damn near every election.
Which is a fact that I think pisses off both sides of this rift. The withholders because the electorate doesn't care enough about Gaza, and the rest who want someone to blame.
In another, closer election, maybe it would be the issue that the election hinged upon and they would be complicit in Trump's actions (including worse Gaza policy than Kamala). But as it turned out, in this election, Gaza was irrelevant to the outcome — as one would expect because there wasn't much daylight between Kamala and Trump on that particular issue.
So everyone can quit poking them with a stick. I don't endorse their position at all, but in hindsight they have a clean conscience on the genocide and Trump.
Fuck off, troll.
I voted for her because but I guarantee the vast, overwhelming majority of people you are trying to trigger didn't think she was worse. What stopped them was having her and the Democratic party she represents ignore the will of their base on issues as fundamental as fucking genocide.
I see it as a failure to understand game theory. However, I respect someone that is having a gun held to their head and being told to do something instinctively responding "fuck you" and refusing to do it, or doing the opposite to send a message. Unfortunately, the they are one in a hundred million and those they are trying to send a message to are too busy tonguing the assholes of wealthy Zionist donors to hear anything but their own marching orders.
For the billionaires only slightly so
States rights for me, none for thee.
It was always about states' rights to own people.
Unemployment while on strike?? That doesn't exist in my eu country, I didn't know it existed anywhere at all!
Is this a thing anywhere else in the world?? My quick web search only returns these blue states in the USA...
Yeah Oregon and Washington just passed this, it doesnt even take effect until next year.
From the WA State Standard: "Workers will be eligible for unemployment benefits starting 15 to 21 days after the strike begins, depending on the day the strike starts. If the contract is resolved before that time, benefits will not be issued."
So basically only if the strike goes on for several weeks, and also if the strikers get any retroactive pay then they have to pay back the unemployment. No one can just "strike for a day" and get paid like they're claiming.
"the asshole is strong in these people"-everyone but also a Jedi
this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
255 points (100.0% liked)
politics
24898 readers
2819 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS