413
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 109 points 1 day ago

It's fun that one can use games for it, but it shouldn't be difficult to do the same through AI-generated imagery either, which isn't much more difficult.

Even though this method is flawed, one shouldn't really use ID-only verification either imho, as it's a security risk to upload any official document like that (ref. Tea app leaks).

The whole age verification that the UK wants to impose has been quite the impossible task from the beginning. Creating government-backed education for (future) parents about how to raise a kid and protect them in today's digital society would be more efficient than this, if we really are thinking of what is best for the kids. But alas, there are zero requirements to become a parent...

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago

The problem, as always, is that parents don't want to put the work into educating their children, they want the government to wave a magic wand and make the problem go away. And that's what gets you half assed solutions like this.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

The OSA is nothing to do with kids or parenting and everything to do with further developing surveillance of the UK and controlling what we can access.

I guarantee you, at some point after this will come prohibiting content deemed terrorism such as mentions of the word 'palestine' and 'action' in the same paragraph for example.

Sooner or later we'll have our own pseudo or real great firewall. I expect them to come after VPN use at some point too.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

VPNs are next.

People circumventing the OSA.
THINK OF THE CHILDREN!
VPNs banned

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago

Tbh just take any stock photo from image search online

[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago

I think the issue there is the k-ID software asks you to do things like open your mouth, then close your mouth - so you'd need to find stock photos of the same person doing stuff like that. Which, now that I think about it, I imagine there will be an influx of selfies of people with closed and open mouths available on google images very soon.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago

These took 5 minutes to make

Honestly we should just move on to device based attestation and if parents want to protect their kids they set up child mode.

I’m not responsible for lazy parenting.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Neither is taking a picture of nearly any stranger about to take a bite of food at a fast food place and then walking over and snapping another picture of them. What they gonna do about it?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

You can't use a picture of me eating noodles to open a bank account.

[-] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is a clever way to bypass. If they get wise and somehow filter out Sam Porter Bridges' face, you could always fire up any of the games of comparable visual realism which let you design your own character's appearance.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

The one thing AI might be good for

[-] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I've seen this suggested elsewhere and it seems like the least intrusive suggestion to me - why not simply use the device as the age verification. Almost every phone/tablet/computer already knows your age through it's own sign-up/activation method, so why not allow the device to offer an API that provides age verification to sites that require it.

It could simply be a permissions-based answer where an adult site requests a yes/no answer to the question "is this user an adult" from the device and the user is prompted to provide the permissions for the site to have that data.

This would solve the problem for the vast majority of iphone/android/windows/macos consumers.

[-] [email protected] 68 points 1 day ago

Spoiler alert- the point isn't to keep kids from looking at porn, it's to keep adults from looking at it too.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Whether or not that's the case, I think the proposed technical implementation above is a better way of enforcing the actual law than what's been applied so far.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

Yeah I do too, but so would anyone who was seriously thinking about this in terms of keeping kids from looking at porn rather than restricting access to "adult content" (whatever that means) more broadly. Any programmer worth their salt would have immediately suggested "hey this is a bad idea we should do it this other way" when asked about the viability of the current solution and yet this was ignored.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The goal is to introduce general surveillance and censorship mechanisms. Whether they be technical, legal precedence, tested boundaries, or changes in laws and government positions.

Porn age stuff is just a convenient entry point. Solving just that without the survellance mechamisms is pointless to these people.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I'm not getting involved in the politics or reasoning of the assumed end goal, I'm just talking from a technical standpoint.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

That is important. Pointing out sane alternatives helps make it clear this isn't an acceptable solution.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

None of my devices required any kind of sign-up/activation.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I mean, great? Most mainstream devices do however, whether it's an AppleID, Google account or Microsoft account.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

It's not a requirement on Android. Like at all. My Windows 10 also isn't signed into Microsoft Account.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

There absolutely is a minimum age requirement to set up a Google account, which you can see from their Ts & Cs. Whether that is enforced is an entirely different question.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Except there is no ID/age verification when you create a Google or Microsoft account (no idea about Apple, don't use that crap), so you're suggesting that the "birthday" field where I can set whatever date I want should be a standard age verification method?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Jesus Christ, no, I'm not suggesting that nothing changes from exactly what we do now. I'm suggesting a new, more secure, less intrusive method, and it's not even an original suggestion. Just try a little bit of thought.

If it's going to be implemented by law anyway, the age verification should be at the device level. The device accounts already do ask your age - directly or indirectly - although it's not stringently enforced, however each of the big 3 already have a minimum age requirement to set up an account as per their terms and conditions.

It's not a big leap to suggest that true age verification is done at that point seeing as you already often have to provide an age or payment information to set up on-device payment details, meaning there's no need to involve a third party at any other subsequent point.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Honestly, I'd rather see official governmental third parties that handle ID verification and guarantee to discord and any service needing age verification that the user is over the required age. Not comfortable with sharing any sort of verifying data with private companies, even less american companies. I have to for some stuff, but... Not liking it one bit.

There is already a few countries here in Europe with an official governmental identity verification system, and I'm pretty sure age verification can be done through them. I think the EU is also working on a system covering the entirety of Europe, but not certain.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

The difficulty you might end up with there is governments not permitting their age verification system for certain sites if they desired. Meaning even greater governmental control of what sites you can access.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

The problem is that would be incredibly easy to bypass at multiple levels. You could set your age as >18 when configuring your device's account (they don't check ID) or modify the OS/browser/client-side webpage itself (the latter of which a simple browser extension could accomplish).

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

As we've seen, the current system is incredibly easy to bypass. There are plenty of ways to game or avoid the age checks.

The current implementation also uses multiple different age verification services, on a per-site basis. This proposed one reduces data exposure vulnerabilities to a fraction.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The techies implementing it probably knew this, but hoped that people would just quietly do it and not blast the news all over the internet. Nope!

I guess soon there will be only the more intrusive/trackable options like credit card or bank details.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Then come the hacks and abuses (executives and politicians not excluded) and we are back to square one, except that everybody and the innocents lost something while the cybercrime syndicates had a field day.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I don't think credit cards are more intrusive than forced selfies, to the contrary.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I think that credit cards are unambiguously tied to you, whereas a photo could be a bunch of people. I appreciate that having someone take a photo of you before you go to a porn site isn't exactly anyone's idea of a utopia.

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
413 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

73233 readers
7 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS