this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
302 points (95.5% liked)

Games

18861 readers
198 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 71 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Crunch Time and overwork, only to rush out a buggy mess that was almost universally panned.

To be fair, this wasn't the workers' faults, but I can imagine that plus the backlash took its toll...

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

8 plus years of development. And a story completely rewritten to shoehorn in a meme celebrity.

This game had disaster written all over it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 71 points 2 years ago (1 children)

probably gaming’s understatement of the week

[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Huge parts of the game were brilliantly done. The writing, voice acting, motion capture are some of the best ever done in a video game. The environment and assets are incredible, the amount of music and soundwork and ambient dialogue is just insane.

They just crunched it too hard and pushed it out too soon. The foundation was there, but there were two many bugs and half baked systems that means that no matter how good the foundation was, the gameplay loop suffered, and immersion was killed.

It was never a bad game, it was a brilliant game made with love and passion, pushed out before it was done.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 years ago

I feel for the devs more than anything, because they didn’t want to release it. Marketing Dept pushed to have it released against their protests, the typical “just ship it” mentality from people who sell things but don’t appreciate how physics work, or how broken the product may still be. When all the customer feedback hit, the devs were like “we know. We needed more time.”

The main positive thing I can see from it all is that the especially ravenous toxic pre-release behavior from customers has changed a bit. People seem more accepting of games getting pushed back so bugs are worked out and things are polished more. That “just ship it” mentality of customers seems to have throttled down quite a bit, which, ironically, was part of what drove marketing dept to release CP2077 before it was ready.

🎶 it’s the cirrrrrrrcle of liiiife 🎵🎶

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 years ago

Not to mention they massively over promised a game that seemed like it was meant to revolutionize every aspect it touched, but instead released a (imo) pretty fun open world game that was a bit of a shitshow on release.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

I'd say there were at least three many bugs

[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 years ago

Yeah layoffs will hurt morale id say

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Didn't they get death threats online too, that probably made things even worse

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

In the current state of the internet, they probably started getting death threats shortly after the project was announced cuz the kerning on an in-game billboard was a little off.

Doesn't take much now-a-days.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 years ago

All marketing and directorships fault.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I get the game is fine now or whatever, but it's too late for me. I moved on a long time ago and will probably never finish it

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 years ago (6 children)

When the DLC dropped they apparently redid the whole progression system so it’s more in line with what fans wanted. It honestly might be worth another try.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago

Playing thru it again, It's great.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I heard they added enemy scaling and people hate that?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's true. I don't hate it per se, but on very hard the first (nomad) car chase was actually impossible and I had to turn down the difficulty to pass it. Now that I'm level 40, everything is way too easy again.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

For me the game still isn't "fine." It's a lot more stable now but even with a completely fresh install and save I'm still running into a lot of the problems that was present during launch like all the civilians looking the same regardless of the setting you're on, NPCs running into each other and then choking up sections of the map. I just keep running into these NPC blobs where they just stand there and do nothing. There's still things they said they fixed like npcs materializing out of nowhere.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Your loss, it's a great game

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Still one of my top games.

Mods are obligatory though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I really hope the mods continue to flourish

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

I read that the company that was supposed to be doing QA testing really fucked them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago
load more comments
view more: next ›