this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
668 points (100.0% liked)

News

29887 readers
3534 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 261 points 2 years ago (32 children)

For fuck's sake... imagine finding out your father, the richest man in the world, fought to only have to pay your mother less than $3000 a month in child support!

[–] [email protected] 138 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I think out of all the things I've heard about Elon Musk, this might be the thing that disgusts me the most.

[–] [email protected] 86 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But surprises me the least

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 years ago

He's a shit dad all around, which is why his kids hate him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago

Well, if he didn't live there and have to pay so litttle, he woudln't be the richest man in the world, would he?

/s

load more comments (30 replies)
[–] [email protected] 166 points 2 years ago (3 children)

So, he's a deadbeat dad and a Nazi. I bet he thinks he's manly as fuck.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40806-022-00318-z

Psychopathic men are more likely to have lots of children, with minimal regard in actually being a parent to those children.

If it quacks like a duck...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 106 points 2 years ago

Mr. "Popullation Collapse" thinks supporting children he creates is too difficult? WOMP WOMP

[–] [email protected] 98 points 2 years ago (5 children)

For the love of god, can we stop treating everything he does like it's news? Let him be a shitty person in some dark corner, don't feed his ego by putting him in headlines.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Hard disagree. It would be one thing if he was just off in his corner by himself being a terrible person, but he’s very much always in the limelight and has a whole cult of personality worshipping the ground he walks on. We need articles like this as a counter to all the ass-kissing going on.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I really don't understand this constant complaint that comes up whenever a news story about Musk is posted. Of course it is newsworthy that the (once) richest man on Earth is doing this, and providing news about what these billionaire oligarchs are up to is definitely part of a relevant newsfeed.

Keeping their actions in the dark only helps normalising their existence and behaviour.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's not a bad thing that more people realize that he's not actually a super genius that's trying to save teh world, but a giant piece of shit. If you don't like reading about what a shit head he is make a filter or something.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago

He's also super-effective at dismissing the notion that billionaires earned what they have, and the concept of meritocraty under capitalism - he's clearly far too stupid to be worthy.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 years ago

To be honest, I find his limitless villainy fascinating and it's hard to look away. It's like watching a slow motion Tesla crash

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 81 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Downvote Musk spam.

The billionaire doesn’t need your help ensuring him and his businesses stay in the 24 hour news cycle. Don’t be a useful idiot.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 67 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Richest man in the world should just fuck off in his SpaceX rocket.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 years ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 years ago

Some people are so poor that all they have is money.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 years ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Reminder. He's a billionaire.

$2760 a month is about $33,120 a year.

According to this calculation, he makes $46,303,000 A DAY.

For context:

At $33,120 a year, he could fund 1,398 child support babies with a single day of work.

And there are Elon-stans.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@return2ozma If the shitstain did not buy twitter he literally could have handed each of his children a billion dollars and still be richer than if he had not bought twitter. He does not appear to be very bright.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 years ago

Only? I'd live with that amount of income

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

TIL that he called his child "X". What an idiot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 years ago

Walzer said Musk and Grimes could spend months just trying to prove which state the kids actually lived in.

That's putting it lightly. Parental disputes that cross state lines is some of the messiest shit one can go through. Just ooof. Dude probably thinks evaporating $44B on Twitter was rough, he's just getting started on this shit.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 years ago (2 children)

After watching his management skills in business, I suspect his being a father isn't a great thing for his kids.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I always wondered why Musk keeps taking X around to all the things and never any of his other kids.

I previously attributed it to getting good PR.

I now sees it's how he's going to "win" against Grimes.

Doucheladdle

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 years ago

Shock. A billionaire who only cares about themself?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 years ago (55 children)

I'm no Muskcuck, but I am in favor of capping the generational transfer of wealth. Let these big inequalities die with this generation and set up a (more) even playing field for the next. If the rich want enhanced educational outcomes for their kids they have to fund public institutions.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 years ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (54 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

An expensive coffee costs $5. For a person that makes $100,000 that's 0.005% of annual income.

Musk's annual cost would be $33,120 for all three kids. I don't know his annual income and because a lot of his worth is in stocks it's probably hard to figure out and highly variable. I'll do some pretty stupid math and say he's worth 185 billion and he's 52, so he's made 3.5 billion a year.

Musk is fighting to pay an annual cost for all three of his three kids of 0.0009% of his annual income, a amount proportionally less than what many spend one day on coffee.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Boo hoo, pay the support, you pompous sycophant. It'll be the least amount of money you'll lose compared to the public embarrassment of buying Twitter and losing billions within the year you've bought it.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›