this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
127 points (95.0% liked)

politics

22674 readers
3810 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Politico.com

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When was the last time a incumbent president has been defeated by a primary challenger?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In short, never. At least not in the era of modern primaries where people have a chance to vote on who will be the candidate, rather than just party leaders selecting the candidate, which began in the 1970s.

If you go back further in time, there's been a few incidents where party leaders denied their endorsement to an election incumbent for various reasons.

https://time.com/5682760/incumbent-presidents-primary-challenges/

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

From Gilmore Girls, I think.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The deadline for parties to submit a list of approved candidates to state election officials is Thursday.

But Florida Democrats acted before then, sending a notice on Nov. 1 to the state that had Biden as the only primary candidate. Phillips had entered the race a few days earlier, and self-help guru Marianne Williamson had been campaigning for months by then.

So when they submitted the candidate list the Dems only had one serious candidate and nothing has changed since then. Got it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Democrats: Trump winning the 2024 election is an eminent threat to our democracy

-- 2024 DNC Primaries --

Also Democrats : Move on there is nothing to see here

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well it is consistent with what the Dems did to Bernie during the 2016 and 2020 election cycles.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Primaries should not be canceled.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

Primaries exist solely to benefit the parties.

Remember that. The states spend a lot of resources to hold primaries, but at the end of the day the purpose is to help each party have their best shot of winning the general election. If the state Democrats think this is their best option, so be it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I mean, it's not like Democrats have convincingly pretended that the results of the primaries aren't preordained since 2016. They're just dropping the act.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

The challenger that's polling 1%, he's there so they don't have to mention Marianne Williamson who's polling at 10+%.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›