this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
129 points (91.6% liked)

Technology

68567 readers
3890 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ubermeisters@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nobody can regulate themselves. There. I made a whole lot of things easier.

[–] CharlesMangione@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

An artificial intelligence designed to the task could, but

[–] hersh@literature.cafe 5 points 1 year ago

But then it will follow hallucinated regulations.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My conspiracy theory is that AI is already running OpenAI, which explains all the weird erratic decisions

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

What do you mean we weren't trained on boardroom shadow takeovers by 49% non-voting members scenarios?

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] snooggums@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

...and they shouldn't even if they could.

[–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 year ago

Nobody can regulate themselves, that's like... the whole point of regulation

[–] db2@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Expand that to any of the toddler-brained tech bros and you've got a plan started.

[–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because we want a bunch of 80 year olds telling tech what to do.

[–] db2@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They already do that. Doesn't make the Elons not also a problem.

[–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

I'd rather the problem that can't send armed goons after me.

[–] GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Spoiler alert: No business regulates themselves effectively. Those that do only do it under duress of govt doing it if they don't.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

In other words, this is more corporate propaganda trying to vilify open source LLMs because they can bypass regulations.

[–] trackcharlie 1 points 1 year ago

Tell me one industry that's ever self regulated properly.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They can't, businesses explicitly are incompatible with self-regulation. I'm not saying let's overregulate the hell out of everything and stop all growth and prevent anything from being possible, but I think there's probably a middle ground here.