this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
52 points (91.9% liked)

Selfhosted

45542 readers
1194 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Title. :)

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If there is one thing you shouldn't cheap out on imo it's the storage.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Broke-ass grad student budgets. Doing my best.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Then just get a pair of hard drives and put them in RAID 1. I use a NAS with a single hand-me-down 5600 RPM HDD and the bandwidth is absolutely fine.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There is probably some iron triangle to be found there; cheap, large capacity ,reliable ; chose two.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can have all three of those, but you won't get great performance. The Samsung QVO SATA drives are a great example. I wouldn't use those for an OS drive but they're fantastic for NAS or media use.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So not fast. Which means the original still holds true.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Oh I agree with your post, but I was responding to Valmond who used different criteria.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Someone convince them to move to lemmy

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

They’ve at least created a website that houses the SSD tier lists, buying guide, etc: https://borecraft.com/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The point is to run TLC drives. SLC drives of that capacity are too expensive and are thus not recommended.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What's TLC and SLC in this context?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • SLC -> Single-Level Cell, i.e. 1 bit per cell
  • MLC -> Multi-Level Cell, i.e. 2 bits per cell
  • TLC -> Triple-Level Cell, i.e. 3 bits per cell
  • QLC -> Quad-Level Cell, i.e. 4 bits per cell

The more bits per cell you store, the more dense and therefore cheaper your flash chips can be for a give capacity. The downside is that it is slower and less reliable since you have to be able to write and read exponentially more voltage states per cell, e.g. 2 states for SLC, 4 states for MLC, 8 states for TLC, etc.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Careful with this- since MLC just means multi, I've seen drives marketed as "3-bit MLC", i.e. TLC

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

WD Green /shrug

I’ve been using all Red Pros since I first built my nas, but it started with a couple of green 2TB that where in there for like 7 years before being replaced (didn’t die yet)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Same, we're ones of dozens I'm sure but I've been running a mix of WD greens and Seagate barracudas in a hardware RAID5 array for over a decade. Only had 2 drive failures over the entire time with no data loss. But yeah... would advise against that if possible

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Your local network is probably 1Gbit or 2.5Gbits so you’ll be good with SATA as an aux drive, say a Samsung 870 QVO. I’d recommend running a smaller NMVe as your main one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I have 8 of these in 4tb. They are wonderful and ive not had a single issue

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Transcend ssd220s (4tb SATA) can be found for really nice prices.
Even had a thread about this one on Lemmy cuz I wasn't sure how good it is (it's great).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:

Fewer Letters More Letters
NAS Network-Attached Storage
NVMe Non-Volatile Memory Express interface for mass storage
RAID Redundant Array of Independent Disks for mass storage
SATA Serial AT Attachment interface for mass storage
SSD Solid State Drive mass storage

5 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 15 acronyms.

[Thread #356 for this sub, first seen 14th Dec 2023, 22:35] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

A SATA ADATA SU800 died on me after 4 years of use. (Luckily I had a weekly harddrive backup so I lost almost nothing! :D)

Samsung, WD, Lexar, Kingston generally are known reliable name brands (but Samsung warranty doesn't work well in Canada). If you watch [email protected] like a hawk (Canada's PC part sales mirrored from Reddit) you may find the occasional deal that is at or under $50/TB Canadian (roughly 36 US$, 35€)

E:I noticed it hasn't posted in a couple days, wonder if it died or got banned

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I have a few discords that may have similar. Thank you for reminding me!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Used enterprise SSDs is what I'm running, bit of work to filter down the results on eBay though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I've been running a couple ADATA Nvme drives since 2019. No issues and they're fast.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

ADATA nVme, SATA m.2 and SATA are my go to for cheap upgrades for laptops and have had no problems with them. Even have a few in external USB cases for large capacity, fast, portable storage and they work great.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Been using Sabrent Rocket SSDs for awhile. Been reliable and fast. They aren't the cheapest SSDs, but they perform well and don't break the bank.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

My only Sabrent Rocket SSD i had started failing within 6 months. Got it in Jan, cut it into pieces and threw it away in June.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I use enterprise drives because they're cheaper and more reliable.

Got some 4TB enterprise NVMe for 150 each. They only had 3TB written, basically brand new.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

New Lemmy Post: Please recommend your cheaper, reliable SSDs 2TB+ (4TB ideal) (https://lemmy.world/post/9575456)
Tagging: #SelfHosted

(Replying in the OP of this thread (NOT THIS BOT!) will appear as a comment in the lemmy discussion.)

I am a FOSS bot. Check my README: https://github.com/db0/lemmy-tagginator/blob/main/README.md

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I've heard good things about the netac n7000, (not the n7000t!), but I have not bit the bullet yet on buying one

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

buffalo, SanDisk, Samsung have all done me well.