this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
88 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

3031 readers
135 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Good!

Pokemon has refused to evolve in any meaningful way over several decades. Just sitting at the top and trying to own the entire concept of "monster friends" isn't a real strategy. At minimum I hope palworld wakes gamefreak up, but honestly I just hope it takes the bandaid off and more devs flow in to the space.

[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"I hope more devs flow in to the space"

You mean Cassette Beasts, Beastie Ball, FUCKING DIGIMON, TemTem etc?

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes. I've seen most of Digimon and bought Temtem over a year ago. But seeing how many Pokémon fans are in a tizy after Pal, I hope it keeps diversifing.

I'm curious why you would reply this. Kinda feels like a "Oh you like X name 3 Y's". Am I misreading the tone? Idk.

[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's moreso that I'm annoyed that Pokémon/Palworld fans seem to act like nothing but Palworld and Pokémon exist and I'm just wondering like "Dude devs have been flowing into the genre for YEARS. Palworld isn't exactly the first"

The genre has been getting revitalized for a while.

[–] dtjones@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

So why is palworld seemingly so much more successful? Niche games like these mean nothing if they don't appeal to a broad enough audience to be successful. I would have initially said the same thing about palworld but now it's the #1 game on steam of all time and in hindsight it is so easy to see why.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

It's the guns.

[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

"Niche games mean nothing"

Digimon is niche to you? The multimedia giant with multiple shows, frequent game releases, merchandise and even a card game which blew up in the TCG scene? The vital bracelet? Digimon Survive? Everything?????

Have you been living under a rock? Digimon had a huge resurgence in the last few years.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago

i mean it made an honest attempt with Arceus, its just the step reletive to how big the IP was mismatched

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Kinda reminiscent of the fein bros trying to copyright 'react' videos on yt. Sad and lame.

[–] shani66@ani.social 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Still don't get this kinda stuff, it's not even vaguely competing in the same ring as Pokemon. But hey if it pisses off the brats into Pokemon then it's fine by me ┐(シ)┌

[–] Poxlox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Palworld is sick as fuck, played pokemon as a kid and got tired of it, but this is a refreshing new take with great gameplay

[–] shani66@ani.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Palworld isn't a take on Pokemon though, it's a take on ark

[–] Poxlox@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I'll take you on my ark

[–] Poxlox@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Love how people on Lemmy kept the Reddit tradition of just downvoting a harmless opinion when they don't agree

[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mostly found Palworld fans obsess over Palworld and force it into every conversation.

[–] panda_paddle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what the raw numbers prove. I paid $1 for a free trial of Gamepass to play it. It's an Ark clone with Pokemon. Wasn't that impressed. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills listening to people rant and rave about it.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

More like a Craftopia clone.

[–] panda_paddle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Which bodes poorly for the people who bought Cradtopia. I remember how mad people were at Wildcard for releasing Scorched Earth while Ark was still in Early Access. Can't imagine how upset they would have been if they had released an entirely different game.

[–] ulkesh@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I do wonder what will happen with those 19 million once the shine wears off. Getting to max level and “catching them all” isn’t really that difficult nor that terribly time consuming. If I had kept playing, I would have hit 50 by now and probably have most of the available pals. And to be fair, I may get back to it and do so, but once I’m done with that I’ll probably put the game away.

I suppose a goal one could have is to work toward being as efficient as possible with their base. But unless there’s some compelling feature after maxing out level and catching the pals, the game is effectively won. Which may be fine and be what is intended (until an expansion arrives).

[–] prof@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's definitely more shallow as a singleplayer experience. In the end it's a survival game and those shine with emergent gameplay when you play with others. Looking at stuff like Rust I believe there will be a core playerbase that sticks around just for that.

But even if singeplayer isn't its main focus, it's definitely a breath of fresh air to have a creature collecting game, that isn't a slow strategy combat slog for once, like Pokémon for the past 20 years.

[–] ulkesh@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Good points!